Peak Oil is You
Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)
Page added on June 12, 2016
Bilderberg Caused The 1973 Oil Crisis
The Bilderberg Group orchestrated the 1973 Oil Crisis and talked OPEC into playing along to ensure that Anglo-American oil companies with ties to Bilderberg would profit from oil exploration in the North Sea.
Now that’s a deep secret they won’t teach you in school because, frankly, Bilderberg doesn’t want you to know. http://www.infowars.com/did-you-know-…
24 Comments on "Bilderberg Caused The 1973 Oil Crisis"
Go Speed Racer on Sun, 12th Jun 2016 7:04 am
1973 is a long time ago. Most of those folks are dead, so looks like they got away with it.
makati1 on Sun, 12th Jun 2016 8:03 am
Go, you need to do some research, 73′ is only 43 years ago. They are mostly still alive and attending to business usual. I was 29 then and my uncle and stepdad were already 50, but both are still alive today. Soros is 85 and still creating chaos all over the world. Ditto for Henry Kissinger age 93, etc..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bilderberg_participants
“Only the good die young.”
Davy on Sun, 12th Jun 2016 8:52 am
Makati Bill is a dork. Speeder is joking goofball.
onlooker on Sun, 12th Jun 2016 8:58 am
Remember these Bilderberg Cabal people are actually families. Think the Rothchilds, the Windsors ie. royalty of Great Britain etc. They pass on their wealth, power and psychopathic behavior to their heirs and descendants.
vox_mundi on Sun, 12th Jun 2016 2:39 pm
Actually, what they discussed was the creation of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and International Energy Agency (IEA).
Here’s the 1973 conference report. Read it yourself …
https://info.publicintelligence.net/bilderberg/BilderbergConferenceReport1973.pdf
For reports from other years go to
https://publicintelligence.net/bilderberg-archive/
WillBan on Sun, 12th Jun 2016 11:17 pm
Vox Mundi,
You are partially correct: the IEA was the main outcome of the 1973 conference, not this BS about the causing the oil shock.
makati1 on Mon, 13th Jun 2016 1:06 am
WillBan, denial?
WillBan on Mon, 13th Jun 2016 2:20 am
Denial!? No way. Just actually doing the research as opposed to uncritically recycling F. William Engdahl’s distortions and fabrications which are the ultimate source of most of Kit Daniels claims. The 1973 Bilderberg meeting is important, but not for the reasons suggested in this Infowars piece. They didn’t plot the 1973 oil shock, they talked about how to reduce their dependence on OPEC oil, how to cut a better with OPEC and establishing an international organisation of oil consumers to counter OPEC. Most of the claims in Daniels piece, starting one in particular made at 0:41 are flat out wrong.
WillBan on Mon, 13th Jun 2016 2:22 am
Oops, should be “cut a better deal with OPEC”
makati1 on Mon, 13th Jun 2016 3:07 am
Will, if you believe that “only to discuss OPEC” bullshit, I have a slightly used bridge in Manhattan that I can sell you cheap. You need ot study a few hundred more sources and come back for a re-run.
Anonymous on Mon, 13th Jun 2016 3:35 am
‘OpEC’ works for the western oligarchs. Always has. But its a convenient lightening rod the uS and its allies use whenever they need someone to ‘blame’ for ‘middle east in-stability’. ‘Opec’ hardly minds all the mud that western ‘journos’ and joe-six pack from montana sling at them, since its basically a PR front for uS military-corporate power brokers.
WillBan on Mon, 13th Jun 2016 4:16 am
makatai1, I’m afraid you’re the one buying Brooklyn Bridge, and probably half the Manhattan subway system as well, if you accept Engdahl’s tale. Read the Bilderberg Meeting Report at the link vox_mundi put up. Please find the part, exactly if you please, where an Arab oil embargo is proposed and agreed to.
makati1 on Mon, 13th Jun 2016 6:56 am
Wiil, you believe everything you read on one site ads total truth? Try a dozen or even 100 sites and come back to me. It’s called “perspective”.
One person witnessing an accident only has one viewpoint to share. 100 witnesses can give a much clearer and accurate picture.
Bilderbergers are Satan’s minions. Nothing more. Nothing less. They want to rule the world. Megalomaniacs all.
WillBan on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 12:03 am
makati1, one site? What an obfuscation or is just ignorance. The claims in the above video are main derived from research of F. William Engdahl and some further embellishments courtesy of Andrew Gavin Marshall. Engdahl’s primary source is the report at the link I referred to: the official minutes of the 1973 Bilderberg meeting. The forms the core of Engdahl’s thesis. He only refers to about half a dozen sources. I’ve research the issue at length referring to nearly a hundred sources and failed to confirm Engdahl’s claims.
But I don’t think this will matter to you. Anyone who starts ranting about “Satan’s minions” gave up on thinking long ago…
makati1 on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 4:13 am
Will, maybe I am just open minded and you are the one who swallowed the propaganda pill? A few paid authors are not significant proof of anything. What “official” minutes of anything can be the truth these days? None! You were not there. You only “know” what you are told.
As for the Bilderbergers, look at who they are and consider their motives. They are not for a peaceful world for you and I. So rant all you want about their supposed actions and wait and see the results.
Davy on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 6:20 am
Mak, give it up Will bitch slapped you. Just shut the pie hole and be a man.
onlooker on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 6:34 am
Nothing coming out of the Bilderbergers or any similar Cabal sources can be trusted. They have been and still are all about Secrecy. But we can gauge their intentions with great accuracy by all they have done up till now. As Mak said NO good intentions for most of humanity.
Davy on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 6:54 am
Agreed, no good intentions for humanity from the cabal of thieves. They are the parasites sucking the blood from a civilization in decline only making it worst. Yet, that does not justify false arguments of facts per agenda’s that are only concerned with self-advancement and in disregard for the facts when they are not convenient. Will has done his research and Mak hasn’t. It is as simple as that. Are we going to acknowledge the truth good or bad or only promote what makes us happy?
Boat on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 8:17 am
Mak,
They want to rule the world. Megalomaniacs all.
Your a cartoon character like Cruella de vil. Lost in a fantasy world of hate. Your as brainwashed as Arabs willing to die to take out some obscure checkpoint.
makati1 on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 8:53 am
““Over almost 20 years of research I’ve found out that what today is called the Bilderberg group already existed over eight hundred years ago,” Estulin told RT correspondents.. “Back then they were called the Venetian Black Nobility. Bilderberg is the creation of the Sinarchy movement, who are very potentially founders and financiers of Hitler. As Sinarchy International they, in turn, were founded by the Freemason esoteric secret society back in the 1770s, as a kind of a counter attack on the principles upon which the United States of America was built.”
“There’s the World Economic Forum at Davos in January/February, the Bilderberg and G8 meetings in June/July, and the IMF/World Bank annual conference in September. A kind of international consensus emerges and is carried over from one meeting to the next. But no one’s really leading it. This consensus becomes the background for G8 economic communiqués; it becomes what informs the IMF when it imposes an adjustment programme on Argentina; and it becomes what the US President proposes to Congress.”
“Big time media is part of the world elite and with the slyness of a slave, they don’t need to be told by the Bilderbergers to keep the meeting secret. They do it voluntarily. The Washington Post, The New York Times, Grupo Prisa in Spain, Le Monde, The Economist, the Wall Street Journal, Toronto Star, the National Post to name just a few, fully realize the advantages of cooperating with the Bilderbergers.”
Some members:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, First Lady of the USA when attending, later 67th United States Secretary of State
Timothy Geithner, Treasury Secretary
Henry Kissinger, 56th United States Secretary of State
Colin Powell, 65th United States Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice, 66th United States Secretary of State
George P. Shultz, 60th United States Secretary of State
Lawrence Summers, Director of the National Economic Council
Paul Volcker, Chair of the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board and Chairman of the Federal Reserve
George H.W Bush
Bill Clinton
Keith B. Alexander, Commander US Cyber Command; Director, National Security Agency.
David Petraeus, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
Rick Perry, Governor of Texas 2000–2015
And on and on…
Davy on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 8:57 am
Makati Bill, where is your link?
There is a long history of such groups that is nothing new but get your facts right and when you do post information from other sources provide a link dumbass.
onlooker on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 9:17 am
Yes, Mak and also their is another line of interrogatory that is the Illuminati and Rothchilds and Jesuits. I am sure you and others may know that London, Washington D.C. and the Vatican are autonomous and not under the purview of any country. The Rothchilds originally were with the Vatican as their Bankers but then gained independent power via the installment of the first Central Bank in London-England. They also gained a strong foothold in the US after the Civil War when they basically usurped the Original Constitution created an autonomous District of Columbia aka Washington D.C. and basically transformed the US into a Corporation. I see a line of families which I heard was about 13 who have been at the top of the food chain for many centuries already. Rothchilds, English Royalty and some in the Vatican are among those. I have little reason to disbelieve this line of information. I will not post links because we are all quite computer literate and can verify information for ourselves. Anyway, what should be obvious and beyond dispute is that an extremely small number of people have such enormous wealth and power. I heard 62 people control as much wealth as 1/2 the planet’s population.
Davy on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 9:29 am
Looker, keep things in perspective on control. 62 people control 1/2 the wealth in aggregate. Their actual physical control is far less. If the world unravels as it appear is the current existential process these 62 would not have much control. I would like them to send their people into Detroit for example in a collapse situation to maintain rights to some so called asset. While I agree with the 62 in a digital BAU sense I do not agree with that assertion in as a physical reality sense.
onlooker on Tue, 14th Jun 2016 9:31 am
Yes your quite correct about that Davy. In the end what power they have will rest on pure brute strength ie. Military/Police