Page added on January 23, 2013
The world’s most influential oil producer, Saudi Arabia, reduced its oil production towards the end of 2012, causing many to conclude the Kingdom sought to reinforce global oil prices, but the Internal Energy Agency has a different take.
Saudi Arabia had been pumping oil at 30-year highs for most of 2012, but cut back supplies by just below 300,000 barrels per day in December to 9.36 million b/d, the IEA said in its most recent Monthly Oil Market Report.
Many analysts and news agencies noted the cutback, proclaiming it was driven by price considerations, with the Saudis looking to ensure they received adequate revenue from oil exports to finance the government’s budget, a move Riyadh is widely believed to have made in the past.
“Market speculation was rife that Saudi Arabia reduced supplies in a bid to set a new price target of $110/barrel,” said the IEA.
IEA called this view shortsighted and reminded readers of the report that “Saudi Arabia has become its own single largest customer,” referring to the over 3.1 million b/d consumed domestically in refineries, power plants – many of which direct-burn crude – and desalination plants.
This considerable domestic oil consumption increase was a major reason behind the Saudi Gas Initiative, designed to discover and produce non-associated gas in the Kingdom that would be used for power generation, thus freeing up valuable oil for export. The Saudis’ non-associated gas ventures, though ongoing, have largely proved disappointing. This has contributed to the push towards developing renewable energy sources, including nuclear power.
The seasonal change in weather to cooler temperatures requires less air conditioning and therefore fewer barrels burned to generate power. “Crude burned at utility plants typically peaks in the May‐September period before starting on a seasonal downturn” the IEA said.
Additionally, decreased demand on behalf of domestic refineries and a major partially-owned plant in the US contributed to the supply reduction. “Lower output in recent months also reflects a seasonal cutback in demand by refiners for the country’s crude. Reduced output in December may also reflect lower‐than‐expected shipments to the US, where Aramco was planning to restart a new 325,000 b/d crude unit at its joint venture Motiva refinery in Port Arthur, Texas,” the report noted.
9 Comments on "Why Has Saudi Arabia Cut Its Oil Output?"
MrEnergyCzar on Wed, 23rd Jan 2013 1:53 am
Maybe they are over pumping seawater into their wells and don’t want them to die prematurely…
MrEnergyCzar
GregT on Wed, 23rd Jan 2013 4:36 am
If they use the oil that they are producing now to build nuke plants, at least they will have still have something to export in 20 years.
SilentRunning on Wed, 23rd Jan 2013 6:31 am
Maybe they are just claiming to be “cutting output” when the truth is closer to “the wells are now past peak, and don’t put out as much any more”
Sophie on Wed, 23rd Jan 2013 9:07 am
“developing renewable energy sources, including nuclear power.”
Since when has nuclear power been declared renewable? Is uranium being created somewhere I’m not aware of?
BillT on Wed, 23rd Jan 2013 2:32 pm
Maybe they want a Fukushima in their back yard? S.A. is not immune to earthquakes. They had a 5.7 recently. Especially as they have removed a lot of the oil and gas volume and that sea water is more viscus than heavy oil. What a juicy target for an Iranian missile!
Kenz300 on Wed, 23rd Jan 2013 2:45 pm
Quote — ” “Saudi Arabia has become its own single largest customer,” referring to the over 3.1 million b/d consumed domestically in refineries, power plants – many of which direct-burn crude – and desalination plants.”
———————-
Internal use of oil continues to grow and the population continues to grow……. neither are sustainable
Time to switch to solar for electricity generation…. they live in the desert.
Kenz300 on Wed, 23rd Jan 2013 4:00 pm
When top oil producers switch to using renewables you know that the world is changing.
http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/take/sunrise-in-the-desert/374?tag=nl.e660&s_cid=e660
Feemer on Thu, 24th Jan 2013 2:28 am
Nuclear power is bad, people may disagree, but the toxic waste created far outweighs any benefits of plentiful “clean” energy, and there is always the threat of another Chernobyl or Fukushima
GregT on Thu, 24th Jan 2013 6:08 am
And then there is the myth of sustainable solar generated electricity.
Perhaps one day we will figure out a way to tap into the natural process of photosynthesis, but for now, we will have to rely heavily on oil to design build and maintain solar infrastructure.