Fig 1: US and Russian oil production changes 2009-2020

The light blue columns show forecasts done in the 3^rd quarter 2014, the dark blue columns those done in February 2015.

US growth is seen to decline to a meagre 160 kb/d by 2017. That is plausible given the high decline rates in tight oil fields.

In the 3 following years 1918-2020 the IEA assumes US growth to be 300 kb/d. That of course is pure speculation. It would require the kind of high oil prices which have killed demand. In all likelihood, QE4 would also be needed which in turn would send the US$ down.

Let’s put the changes from Fig 1 into a production graph

The green line shows actual production up to 2014. Then the changes are added. The light blue line is the 3^rdquarter 2014 forecast (when oil prices were still around the $100 mark), peaking by the end of the decade. It was obviously arrived at by shifting the earlier MTOMR 2014 (brown line) up by around 1 mb/d to allow for a higher actual production during the course of 2014. The dark blue forecast done in Feb 2015 (when oil prices had dropped to $50) depicts slower growth, but no peaking. Remember that the IEA prefers to show growth because its member states want it that way.

Note the increasing volumes of NGLs (natural gas liquids like ethane, butane and propane) which also depend on future production of wet gas.

So let’s put the NGLs from Fig 3 into Fig 2:

Crude oil and condensate, most important as refinery input, is shown to grow less than the total oil production.

For comparison, this is a 2-year forecast from the Energy Information Administration:

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, January Short-Term Energy Outlook
Note: Graph does not include production from Alaska and the Federal Gulf of Mexico.

Fig 5 shows the quarterly additions stacked on legacy production. It demonstrates the real problem of this oil supply system in which production profiles are getting steeper and steeper. In 2014, annual decline in existing wells was 2 mb/d (34%!),  in 2015 it will be 2.4 mb/d.

The graph also shows the number of rigs (for both oil and gas) but in the meantime the drop since Oct 2014 has increased.  The oil rig count end February was down by almost 40%.

Fig 5 excludes Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico (1.96 kb/d in 1Q 2015) so let’s have a look at their historic production to see the difference to shale oil:

Fig 8: GOM crude oil production
http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=MCRFP3FM2&f=M

The graphs speak for themselves. EIA’s Short Term Energy Outlook has Alaskan oil declining by 30 kb/d and GOM increasing by 150 kb/d between 1Q 2015 and 4Q 2016, for a total of just 120 kb/d (p 34)http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/steo/

The numbers from the EIA are marginally lower by 200-300 kb/d. Most importantly, the trend of slowing growth is the same.

To keep everything in perspective US tight oil proved (P1) reserves end 2013 were just 10 Gb, approximately 4 months of global oil consumption. The reserve is produced at a very high 7% pa.

Back to the IEA report where the production changes from Fig 1 have been used to arrive at a production graph:

Note Fig 10 is not zero scaled and has a totally different scale compared to the US production graph (Fig 2). The peak is actually quite flat. The decline is no surprise as the Russian Ministry of Finance warned in July last year that oil production would fall in 2016. http://crudeoilpeak.info/russia-peak.

Russia is at peak. US production growth is going to slow down. Whenever the 2^nd (and last) US peak happens, that will be the global peak, barring eternal peace breaks out in the Middle East and Iraq can produce 6 mb/d by 2020.

4 Comments on "US shale oil growth practically zero in 2017"

Plantagenet on Tue, 3rd Mar 2015 1:00 pm 



Amazing that the IEA is projecting slow growth in US shale production for the next five years in spite of the oil glut and the collapse in oil prices.

dave thompson on Tue, 3rd Mar 2015 1:08 pm 



So long paint thinner “glut”.

rockman on Tue, 3rd Mar 2015 1:23 pm 



So let’s look at that projected rig count. The EIA just last January predicts the decline will about 1.500 by the beginning of March, bottom out around 1,250 rigs by 3Q 2015 and increase to 1,500 by the end of 2016. And thus their prediction of future oil production is tied to rig activity: if it ain’t drilled it ain’t gonna produce. And just below that EIA chart is one showing 1,000 rigs drilling in the beginning of February. IMHO if the EIA ca come close to accurately predicting the rig count just 8 weeks out I’m not sure how good their prediction is for the next two years.

shortonoil on Tue, 3rd Mar 2015 2:40 pm 



Historically the IEA has been “rather” optimistic with their projections. This report is no exception. If you notice, there is not one word in this report about the price of crude. Without a reasonably accurate projection of price any conclusions about future production are just dart board exercises.

http://www.thehillsgroup.org/depletion2_022.htm

We doubt things will turn out as well as they have predicted!