Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on December 1, 2013

Bookmark and Share

Technology giving new nations a shot as energy producers

Production

New technologies to unlock energy below the earth’s surface could transform the global energy picture, allowing a handful of nations not ordinarily thought of as energy producers to emerge.

That’s because shale formations holding natural gas and oil are more widely spread around the globe than traditional oil reservoirs, broadening access to energy.

“Ten years from now, Poland will be a winner. Bulgaria could be a winner, Romania and Lithuania, too,” said David L. Goldwyn, founder of Goldwyn Global Strategies, an energy intelligence consultancy in Washington.

Natural gas and oil lie under the eastern Mediterranean Sea, turning Cyprus, Israel, Lebanon and even the Gaza Strip into potential energy producers.

Changes in Africa

Africa’s energy picture is also in flux. While big suppliers like Nigeria and Angola on Africa’s west coast reel from dropping U.S. demand for their crude, Mozambique in East Africa is poised to tap into huge offshore natural gas reserves that could prove transformative.

“Five years from now, they are going to be a major [liquid natural gas] export power to the Indian Ocean. Mozambique will be the hub of East African gas,” Goldwyn said, adding that neighboring Tanzania also will benefit from cheaper energy.

“That whole region will see access to electricity, cheaper product prices . . . and they’ll have the opportunity for some terrific prosperity,” Goldwyn said.

Face obstacles

In Latin America, Argentina has the world’s second largest shale gas reserves. But unlike Colombia and Brazil to the north, nations that have opened the doors to foreign investment, Argentina will have trouble raising the tens of billions of dollars it needs to invest following its 2001 default on the financial markets.

Other obstacles can arise. Entrenched nationalism in Mexico means most production is in the hands of the state giant, Petroleos Mexicanos, which has limited capital and experience to tap into the world’s sixth largest shale gas reserves.

“Mexico doesn’t know how to do it,” said Miriam Grunstein Dickter, an energy expert at the Center for Research and Teaching of Economics in Mexico City.

Mexico’s Congress is in the final weeks of debating a proposal to open up the energy sector to foreign investment in risk-sharing contracts that could spur exploration and production in deep Gulf of Mexico waters and in shale formations near the border with Texas.

Even factors like lack of water and poor roads can hinder development, said Peter Kiernan, lead energy analyst for the London-based Economist Intelligence Unit, signaling the case of Poland.

“The shale gas reserves are in rural areas where the roads are very narrow. There’s a lot of stress on the roads from delivering the thousands of truck trips that you need to transport the fracking fluids back and forth,” Kiernan said.

Colombian success

While some nations stumble in unleashing their potential, others don’t.

Colombia, which in the 1990s experienced a decline in production, has sharply reversed its fortunes, opening the door to new companies. Half of new petroleum reserves discovered last year were from companies new to the country, Energy Minister Federico Renjifo Velez said. Shale oil also appears abundant.

“Colombia has an enormous energy capacity,” Renjifo boasted.

Mark C. Thurber, associate head of the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development at Stanford University, said shale oil and gas development worldwide, even if still on a small scale, has the potential to level the global energy playing field.

“These shale resources are distributed more widely,” he said. “There are implications to having things more evenly spread around. From an economic perspective, it makes it harder to hold cartel power.”

Miami Herald



6 Comments on "Technology giving new nations a shot as energy producers"

  1. J-Gav on Sun, 1st Dec 2013 8:16 pm 

    Gee, it all looks pretty rosy, doesn’t it? Maybe I’ll move to Poland, my wife speaks some Polish and who doesn’t want to live alongside some “winners?” Never mind that the initial drilling there cost a bundle and brought … euh, well, nothing!

  2. rollin on Sun, 1st Dec 2013 9:33 pm 

    Everybody worldwide, line right up to be the next to pour CO2 into the air and oceans. Step right up, get your few years of oil and gas at high prices. Make sure your country is full of underground toxins, has a lot less water, and is full of holes that will eventually leak methane and who knows what into your water table. Hurry, hurry, hurry to get your shot at being like them. It’s hot hot hot and getting hotter by the day, don’t delay. You don’t want to miss this opportunity.

  3. Dave Thompson on Sun, 1st Dec 2013 11:09 pm 

    Technology does not = energy.

  4. Mike2 on Sun, 1st Dec 2013 11:52 pm 

    @Dave Thompson: Technology does indeed =energy, but in an other context then oil and gas. Nuclear power is pure technology and even the hole “fuel-thing” can be managed completely by technology in the way that we reuse existing heavy meal stocks(reprocessing, reenrichment, actinide breeding). Gas and oil will stay “premium” transportable high denity-energy for example airplanes but normal cars for example can drive mostly electric. Big ships by reactor-power… fuel will NEVER go short this way. -As hubbert predicted.

  5. BillT on Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 1:19 am 

    Mike2, tech is not a producer of energy. It is a facilitator only. Tech only exists as a by product of the hydrocarbon age. As it dies, so will tech. At least the kind requiring energy other than muscle or those adaptions of wind and solar used pre-hydrocarbons.

    Nuclear requires a huge amount of hydrocarbon energy to exist. Ditto for electric power. Even hydro-electric requires huge metal turbines that require huge amounts of hydrocarbon energy to exist.

    Tech’s tunnel vision is why so many laugh at them. They NEVER see the total picture, only the narrow part they are worshiping at the time.

    There is a reason why these things did not exist in the pre-hydrocarbon ages. They ALL require huge amounts of cheap, concentrated energy only provided by hydrocarbons, i.e., oil, coal and natural gas.

  6. rockman on Mon, 2nd Dec 2013 1:20 pm 

    “That’s because shale formations holding natural gas and oil are more widely spread around the globe than traditional oil reservoirs, broadening access to energy.”

    Wrong on several levels. First: “shales” do not produce oil/NG. Only some shale formations have been proven to produce oil/NG at commercial levels. The vast majority of the many dozens of US shale formations have been proven non-commercial even with hz drilling and frac’ng. Which is why just two of the US unconventional reservoirs account for 80% of that production category.

    Second, even if some countries have commercial shale formationa it will be nearly impossible for most to develop it on significant time scale. It takes a huge drilling, frac’ng and production infrastructure to do so. An infrastructure that exists in very few places on the planet outside of the US. And even when such circumstances come close to developing it would require a huge amount of capex that isn’t available in most countries especially those where the oil/NG industry is dominated by an NOC as opposed to the thousands of private corporations behind the US shale development.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *