Page added on July 5, 2012
I discovered something interesting while poking around this morning on the website of the Bureau of Economic Analysis (the agency that produces GDP statistics for the United States). It turns out they have a spreadsheet with estimates of the amount of energy inputs to different industries. Since they also have estimates of the outputs of different industries, and for the oil and gas industry “output” means oil and gas, it’s possible to form estimates of the ratio of energy output to energy input. That ratio is above for 1998-2010 – all the data available.
This is very, very roughly like an energy-return-on-energy-invested (EROEI) for US oil and gas – a familiar concept in energy analysis. It isn’t that for several reasons:
The last point, for example, should probably be invoked to explain the spike in 2009 when new investment collapsed in the low price environment following the financial crisis, yet output was still fairly high based on prior investments.
This is also a narrow boundaries analysis – we are looking just at energy used directly in operations by the oil and gas industry, not at embodied energy used in their materials or by their suppliers.
All that said, it’s hard to believe that if the EROEI of the US oil and gas industry were plummeting (due, say, to the excessive investment required to frack oil and gas out of tight resource plays) that this ratio would be rising. But rising it appears to be: if the numbers are to be believed, over the last decade or so, the industry is producing more dollars of energy output per dollar of energy input.
One Comment on "Rising Energy Output/Input Ratio for US Oil and Gas"
sparky on Thu, 5th Jul 2012 10:15 pm
.
that is a valid analysis since the dollar value is immediate there is not time lag ,
be aware that the real skew is that the inputs price is higher ,
the outputs are the most valuable part of the hydrocarbon what is being used in the process is the cheap stuff or hard to merchandise stuff