Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on June 10, 2012

Bookmark and Share

North American Natural Gas is Fueling an International Political Power Shift

Production

North American exports of natural gas threaten the dominance of gas exporting giants like Russia, Qatar and Algeria who currently control much of the world’s gas supplies.

First U.S. natural gas exports are still three years away, but it’s already creating a buzz. Rivals who dominate the business now are trying to play down the threat but they are already feeling the heat.

“They are all jittery,” Prabhat Singh, marketing director at India’s state-run Gail (India) Ltd. (532155.BY), told Dow Jones Newswires in an interview on the sidelines of a conference. Gail, India’s largest gas utility, is emerging as a major LNG buyer in the region.

Major exporters have traditionally wielded a commanding position in market, be it piped gas or liquefied natural gas. Some have displayed their clout by cutting off supplies. But this could be at risk if North America enters the market with its cheaper, Henry Hub-linked gas and there are signs it’s already happening.

“There used to be a tone full of arrogance earlier,” Mr. Singh said, referring to major exporters’ stance in price negotiations. “Now there is a tone which has mellowed down.”

U.S. gas production has surged over the past decade on the back of technology that allows extraction of gas from shale deposits. This has pushed U.S. gas prices to the lowest in a decade, opening up the possibility of shipping gas to Asia where prices are just short of record highs but demand is still robust.

Oil majors such as ExxonMobil and Royal Dutch Shell are exploring exports of natural gas from the U.S., which will require multi-billion dollar investments to produce and liquefy the gas that must be transported in specially designed tankers.

Gail has already signed a contract to buy LNG from Cheniere Energy‘s Sabine Pass facility in the U.S.–the first project to get all regulatory approvals. It now plans to use its portfolio of LNG supplies including the Henry Hub-linked cargoes as a yardstick for negotiating other deals.

“Today the scenario has changed,” Mr. Singh said. “The best thing is Henry Hub-linked gas prices are now coming to India,” which would give Indian buyers leverage while negotiating prices with other suppliers.

Over the last few years, Indian buyers have had to buy cargoes referenced to the relatively high price India paid for Gorgon LNG. Prices in Asia are often based on existing contracts due to the absence of a regional benchmark. Asian buyers pay a premium for LNG due to the vast difference between demand and supply, while prices are more volatile as they are linked to crude oil instead of gas, unlike in the U.S. or Europe.

The very idea of North American LNG exports entering the market has changed the mindset of Asian buyers, Mr. Singh said. And that is creating a headache for major LNG exporters that have or are making big-ticket investments in projects.

Speaking at a conference in Kuala Lumpur this week, Russian gas giant OAO Gazprom‘s Deputy Chief Executive Alexander Medvedev and Hamad Al Mohannadi, chief of Qatar’s RasGas, both played down the significance of North American exports.

Mr. Medvedev said he doesn’t consider unconventional gas from the U.S. as competition, while Mr. Mohannadi said volumes of North American LNG exports would be limited due to domestic demand.

Qatar is the world’s largest LNG exporter and Russia, which sells most of its gas through pipelines, is drawing up big plans for LNG exports to reach more customers.

Gazprom said this week that its ambitious Shtokman gas project in Arctic waters would now be turned into a full LNG project.

Mr. Singh said the posturing by the big exporters isn’t surprising. “If I were a major [exporter], what would I do? I have to tell the world that this is a mirage, don’t run after it. I have everything, buy expensive gas from me.”

GCaptain



7 Comments on "North American Natural Gas is Fueling an International Political Power Shift"

  1. Rick on Mon, 11th Jun 2012 1:04 am 

    This is BS, otherwise known as propaganda.

  2. DC on Mon, 11th Jun 2012 1:24 am 

    This is the dumbest crap Ive heard this week. There is no international market for NG. Amerika cant ‘replace’ any of those countries listed even if it wanted to. NG is dug-up and shipped locally. Its not shipped in huge cheap flimsy single-hulled tankers like oil is. Even if it wanted to, Frak gas wont last forever and its so expensive to dig-up, let alone ship in LNG tankers, it couldnt compete with Ruissan Qatar if whoever once it got there.

    Alone in the world, amerika fraks gas in suburban neighorhoods and near schools etc. I guess they could dump it at a huge loss after building a fleet of expensive LNG tankers to get it, just in time for the supply to start drying up back home. Sounds like a plan eh?

  3. BillT on Mon, 11th Jun 2012 2:46 am 

    DC & Rick have it right. 3 years is eternity in today’s debt ridden world. There may not be a US in 3 years. At least not one able to produce and export anything.

  4. Grover Lembeck on Mon, 11th Jun 2012 5:18 am 

    They keep trying to build an export terminal on the Columbia river. Good luck with that, guys. No one wants a natural gas export terminal anywhere- everyone knows that it would make gas prices go up, and when prices do go up later this year or next, people will like the idea even less. Many of us are unhappy about the environmental costs of this stuff, also. That’s not going away, either.

  5. SOS on Mon, 11th Jun 2012 3:51 pm 

    If America doesnt find uses for its abundant resources here at home it will be exported. We need gas fired power plants and factories built in the gas producing regions.

  6. simon on Mon, 11th Jun 2012 6:17 pm 

    HAHA, USA lets corporations dictate energy development and shoots itself in the foot by overproducing gas –making it super cheap in US– but unable to export for real gains. Thank you “free-market capitalism, thank you Chesepeake Energy” please bend us over a little lower.

    How much more viable and profitable to US coffers would’ve been to develop export markets/facilities while delaying gas development? I hope we’re satisfied with the temporary jobs that little bubble created for is likely they won’t last. Don’t matter as long as the few corporations were able to speculate to the next quarter, corporations are ‘people’ after all, though obviously not very long-lasting.

  7. SOS on Mon, 11th Jun 2012 10:58 pm 

    Corporate america has been slowed and stopped in gas export facilities because of the strong political coalition against it. Even without the government helping in the USA the facilities and infrastructure are going to be put into place, restoring balance to the markets and a fair price to producers.

    Current peak politics is again creating a huge bottleneck in the energy supply chain severely damaging companies like Chesepeake ($17.71).

    The other big factor is the cost advantage to using the NG here. With prices held in check by a huge supply long term investments like gas fired electric plants and factories can now be made.

    These developments will have a huge positive impact on the US economy and the quality of life here in our country.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *