Page added on September 29, 2011
North America appears headed for an oil renaissance, with crude production expected to hit an all-time high by 2016 given the current pace of drilling in the U.S. and Canada, according to a study released by an energy research firm this week.
U.S. oil production in areas including West Texas’ Permian Basin, South Texas’ Eagle Ford shale and North Dakota’s Bakken shale will record a rise of a little more than 2 million barrels per day from 2010 to 2016, according to data compiled by Bentek Energy, a Colorado firm that tracks energy infrastructure and production projects.
Canadian crude production is expected to grow by about 971,000 barrels per day during the same period, with much of the oil headed for the U.S.
Combined, the U.S. and Canadian oil output will top 11.5 million barrels per day, which is even more than their combined peak in 1972.
Goldman Sachs has estimated the U.S. could move from being the No. 3 oil producer behind Saudi Arabia and Russia to the No. 1 spot by 2017.
It’s a reversal of the steady downward production trend that started after 1971, when U.S. oil production peaked at around 9.5 million barrels per day.
The current pace of production has caught quite a few people by surprise, says Joseph Pratt, a historian at the University of Houston who has written extensively about the oil and gas industry.
“We have this momentum out there to set about doing what we said we wanted to do back in the 1970s: reduce the flow of imports from volatile regions,” Pratt said. “It was like the Holy Grail back then. And suddenly it seems possible.”
The surge is fueled by the same drilling and production techniques that opened up natural gas production in recent years — the combination of horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing — as well as the success of deep-water Gulf of Mexico projects and the ramp-up of Canadian oil sands projects.
The glut in natural gas supply has kept its price low, prompting producers to focus more effort on oil and natural gas liquids, which fetch better prices.
Earlier this year, the number of land and offshore oil rigs working in the U.S. exceeded the number of natural gas rigs for the first time in 18 years, according to data compiled by IHS-CERA.
In addition, Texas oil and gas industry employment returned to its pre-recession highs in June, according to the Texas Petroleum Index, topping the last boom that peaked in October 2008, thanks largely to oil drilling.
The oil boom has plenty of economic upside potential. IHS-CERA predicts oil production could directly and indirectly generate another 1.3 million U.S. jobs over the next decade and could raise an additional $97 billion in federal taxes and royalty payments.
But plenty of people are concerned about the other costs that might come with more oil production.
The proposed Keystone XL pipeline, a major project to bring Canadian oil sands to U.S. Gulf Coast refineries, has become a rallying point for environmentalists, with hundreds arrested during a lengthy, high profile sit-in in front of the White House several weeks ago.
For its part, the Environmental Protection Agency is moving forward with new rules aimed at tighter controls on emissions from oil and gas drilling, production and transportation.
The industry contends the proposed rules put a costly burden on a job-creating industry at a time when the country needs jobs.
But Daniel J. Weiss, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, a liberal-leaning think tank, says the industry is far from being hobbled financially.
He notes that the five oil majors — Exxon Mobil, Shell, BP, Chevron and ConocoPhillips — have reported $67 billion in 2011 profits and are sitting on $60 billion in cash. Yet they have cut more jobs than they’ve created in recent years and have spent billions buying back their own stock, Weiss said.
Pratt predicts that tensions among the resurgent oil industry, community groups and environmental groups — heightened by last year’s Deepwater Horizon accident and oil spill — will continue.
The conflict was manifest in public hearings Monday in Port Arthur, where federal officials took comments on the Keystone XL pipeline project, Pratt said.
“The first 25 speakers were union workers and locals saying they needed the jobs the pipeline would bring. Then the bus from Houston pulled up and the environmental groups spoke about how it’s the filthiest oil in the world,” Pratt said.
“All of them had passion about their point of view, but there are questions of fairness and justice and economics that we just don’t know how to talk about.”
7 Comments on "N. American oil output could top 40-year-old peak"
MrEnergyCzar on Thu, 29th Sep 2011 3:23 am
Tar Sands will do that…
MrEnergyCzar
BillT on Thu, 29th Sep 2011 8:12 am
When the price of oil drops below $80…the ‘alternate sources will end.
DC on Thu, 29th Sep 2011 10:20 am
Couple things, this all-time ‘high’ they refer to, is padded with either actual production or implied future production of tar-sands, shale, frak gas and probably even kerogen. FAIK, they even included gas siphoned from abandonded cars in detroit in there numbers, who knows. Conventional oil production is long past peak in N.A. For example, there is not a lot of old-fashioned regular ‘oil’ comeing out of alberta these days. Few people appreciate most of Albertas ‘energy’ these days is almost all tar-sands+Nat Gas which I gather is still doing ok, but even there, lots of fraking going on.
The other problem I have with ‘all-time high’ is what comes after that? From my own real-world observations, there is only place you can go form a all-time high, down. Maybe I should publish that discovery, I might call it, What goes up, must come down theory(tm). I wasnt aware Gold-man sachs was in the business of predicting where our energy is going to come from in 2016, or any year for that matter. I thought there expertise lay in the ponzi-scam FIRE economy and public-to-private wealth transfers, not energy.
Beery on Thu, 29th Sep 2011 11:39 am
Thank God! They must have found another massive reservoir of light sweet crude. A new Saudi under our blessed country. Oh, we’re saved!
Wait, Canadian tar sands? Bakken shale?
Oh dear!
SolarDave on Thu, 29th Sep 2011 1:35 pm
The last squeeze of the sponge will be the hardest – and the most costly.
Posted while pedaling – powered be me!
James A. Hellams on Thu, 29th Sep 2011 5:25 pm
There are three critical factors missing in this report.
The first factor is the amount of oil (in billions of barrels) in the reserves to supply this oil.
The second critical factor is the worldwide annual consumption of oil in billions of barrels.
The third factor is the ratio of energy return on energy investment. When the energy return falls to, and equals the energy investment; IT IS ALL OVER!
Harquebus on Fri, 30th Sep 2011 1:51 am
From the last of the easy and cheap to the first of the hard and expensive.