Page added on March 14, 2013
The United States is expected to lead the pack among non-OPEC members in terms of oil supply growth for 2013. That’s the assessment from this month’s market report from the Vienna-based cartel. OPEC said it projected U.S. oil supply growth of around 600,000 barrels per day in 2013, with most of that coming out of tight oil formations in the country. For the U.S. Energy Department’s Energy Information Administration, that means oil imports should fall to their lowest level since 1985. Republican leaders in the House of Representatives said more energy development is the key to a balanced budget, a sentiment enforced by EIA predictions of 7.9 million U.S. bpd by 2014. OPEC, however, said it may need to revise its figures because a possible slowdown in the U.S. oil boom.
House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., unveiled a 91-page plan that he says would balance the budget in 10 years without raising taxes. The congressman said the Obama administration was over-subsidizing renewable energy programs to the detriment of the fossil fuels industry. With that policy, Ryan said the administration is standing in the way of the country’s true energy potential.
“Our country has 163 billion barrels of recoverable oil and enough natural gas to meet the country’s demand for 90 years,” his agenda states.
The EIA, in its latest report, said it estimates 2012 oil production averaged around 6.5 million barrels per day. The average for November and December, however, was 7 million bpd, the highest volume recorded in twenty years. By 2014, that level should reach 7.9 million bpd. For EIA Administrator Adam Sieminski, that means the United States is relying less on foreign markets to meet its energy needs. By next year, foreign imports should fall to 32 percent of consumption, putting the United States on the road to the energy independence envisioned by House Republicans.
OPEC finds that tight oil production, coupled with modest growth from the Gulf of Mexico, meant most of the supply growth from non-members would come from the United States. For Ryan, expanding that growth to potential on federal lands, now off-limits, could add another $14.4 trillion in cumulative economic activity during the next 30 years. House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Doc Hastings said that’s reason enough to embrace fossil fuels over tax increases.
“(Ryan’s budget) recognizes that expanded American energy production is one of the best ways to raise new revenue, bolster the economy, lower gasoline prices, and put Americans back to work at good-paying jobs,” he said.
OPEC, in its forecast, said U.S. oil supply growth is projected at 600,000 bpd this year. That figure, however, is 40,000 bpd less than the previous year. The Vienna-based cartel said U.S. oil growth could go either way for 2013, but noted growth from tight oil developments in states like North Dakota is expected to slow down. While improved drilling technology may offset some of that decline, OPEC said that factors like price issues may dampen the oil boom in the United States. In 2009, the EIA found that opening more land could add another 500,000 bpd to the market, but once OPEC adjusts, the economic impact may be muted. OPEC is already adjusting, saying it expects the world will need about 29.7 million bpd of its oil in 2013, a decline from last year.
The White House said it believes Ryan is sincere in his effort to address ongoing budget issues. Apart from entitlement reforms and spending issues, however, its emphasis on domestic energy may be more of a platform issue. Though U.S. oil production is experiencing steady expansion, it’s starting to slow down and with it potentially goes the revenue for which Ryan’s plan depends.
8 Comments on "Is The U.S. Oil Boom About To Bust?"
James A. Hellams on Thu, 14th Mar 2013 9:55 pm
The statement is made that we have 163 billion barrels of recoverable oil.
The last time I looked, the oil consumption of the US was approximately 8 billion barrels annually. The 163 billion barrels would last the US (assuming it could all be produced) 20 years.
The annual oil consumption of the world, last time I looked, was 31 billion barrels annually. Assuming all the 163 billion barrels could be produced; the 163 billion barrels would last the world for less than 5 years.
J-Gav on Thu, 14th Mar 2013 11:42 pm
Ryan isn’t sincere about anything. Ryan is an asshole.
Kenz300 on Thu, 14th Mar 2013 11:44 pm
Climate Change is real…
We need to reduce our fossil fuel use not increase it.
BillT on Fri, 15th Mar 2013 1:37 am
Why cannot people understand that not all of the oil is EVER going to be recovered and burned? It’s not just what is there, but what is economical to get out of the ground and what finances are available to make it possible.
Even if you ignore EROEI (like most economists do), you still need a functioning financial system that can finance it’s constantly increasing costs. THAT is the weak link at this time and place.
The Us economy is about to collapse and the dollar will be practically worthless in the next few years (3-6). When that happens, the pumps stop. The drilling stops. And the trips to Walmart stop. End of the game!
keith on Fri, 15th Mar 2013 3:27 am
BillT is right. Even, we doomers, can’t imagine things going to hell over night, but it is possible. High interest rates make money for the elite. Yet, interest rates have been low for over a decade. Why? There has been no attempt to raise them. What will happen when they do raise?
Airwicky on Fri, 15th Mar 2013 7:49 am
I agree too with BillT yet we find capitalism can be adaptable. Our system won’t collaspe completely but instead may look like Mexico in half a decade.
The USA will be one of the last countries using oil to support our modern way … this will only include a handful of the 1% today tho and the system would have most likely gone corrupt yet quasi functional.
mike on Fri, 15th Mar 2013 8:43 am
Until human labour is more efficient than extracting oil, oil will still be produced. This means a) human labour costs will dramatically decrease (think china) and Oil will eventually rise to over $1000 a barrel (still cheap for the amount of work it does). Of course the only people using it at that price will be the 0.1%. A techno feudal future awaits us I’m afraid.
GregT on Fri, 15th Mar 2013 4:51 pm
EROEI.
Once the oil returns less energy, then the energy required to produce it, the oil will stay in the ground.
It makes no difference what the price is.