
Page added on September 12, 2014

When a compressor at Chevron’s massive Sanha gas field off the coast of Southern Africa showed subtle signs of overloading, the first person to notice was not one of the crew on site but rather a drilling expert sitting in front of an array of screens and monitors high up in a Houston office tower around 6,000 kilometres away.
The operator who noticed the issue was situated in the comfort of the company’s Machinery Support Centre, from where he and his colleagues monitor thousands of pieces of equipment across six continents.
While the crew on site would most likely have discovered the problem, acting on the operator’s tip guaranteed the company was able to save several million dollars in downtime and lost production.
This is one example of a phenomenon that is hardly new but which is becoming increasingly common: the digitisation of oil and gas fields – essentially an umbrella term used to refer to computerised networks and processes which help create a sophisticated monitoring and controlling system for oil wells.
Between 2005 and 2010, according to a Peak Oil news report last year, the number of patents filed in classes relating to the oil and gas industry in the United States doubled from just under 700 to almost 1,400. Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, a CIL UK spot poll of 17 senior oil industry execs had almost 80 per cent of them saying digital advancements areas as diverse as land seismic imaging and e-Learning had ‘revolutionised’ the industry.
Indeed, medium and high impact opportunities for use of digital technology exist across almost all aspects of operations, from modelling to drilling to maintenance and capital productivity.
Take maintenance, for example, where risks of process disruptions and catastrophic failures can be minimised and equipment reliability and production efficiency maximised through the radio-frequency-identification tapping of equipment, along with use of other sensors. This allows for the tracking of activity and enables applications that can monitor the condition of equipment and support predictive maintenance and automated operations shutdowns.

The business impacts of this are significant. A recent benchmarking analysis by McKinsey & Company of offshore platforms on the North Sea showed a 40 per cent ‘performance gap’ between ‘best-in-class players’ (many of whom have highly digitised operations) and other companies.
This is important as even a 10 percentage point efficiency improvement can yield bottom line benefits of between $US220 million and $US260 million on a single brownfield asset, the research firm suggests.
Several factors are driving the push in these areas. Developments in increasingly hostile areas such as deep-water or arctic exploration require reliable automated or semi-automated operations.
The lack of tolerance for safety or environmental incidents means costs associated with operational failure can be huge – witness the speculation that BP could be fined as much as $US18 billion after being found to be primarily responsible for the Deepwater Horizon explosion, on top of the $28 billion odd the company has already forked out on damage and clean-up costs.
Finally, the anticipated retirement of thousands of petrochemical workers will leave a gaping hole in labour resources, forcing greater reliance on technology as opposed to labour intensive operations.
Still, things can go wrong, McKinsey principals and associate principals Stefano Martinotti, Jim Nolten, and Jens Arne Steinsbø suggest in one of the research firm’s insight articles.
Again using maintenance as an example, having only isolated data availability as opposed to broader network-based availability or having equipment level profiles only of at-risk components as opposed to comprehensive coverage at the asset level can lead to data “leakage.” More broadly, some companies simply are not good at aggregating data and conducting meaningful analysis or converting such analysis into action.
In order to improve chances of success, McKinsey suggests companies build multi-disciplinary teams, differentiate between greenfield developments where digitisation can be built inbuilt into project design from brownfield ones where it must be largely overlaid, and use small-scale pilot implementations to begin with before upscaling once the concept is proved.
While challenging, the McKinsey leaders above say the benefits of digitised operations are worthwhile.
“There is a clear competitive imperative for increasing automation in oil and gas production,” Martinotti, Nolten, and Steinsbø wrote. “Companies that successfully implement big data and analytics, sensors, and other new technologies will be well positioned to meet their industry’s challenges.”
8 Comments on "How Technology is Revolutionising the Oil and Gas Industry"
MSN fanboy on Fri, 12th Sep 2014 7:21 am
Hey guys, at what price is this complex tech viable?
and if the tech we have today is 95% right, arent we hitting diminishing returns?
JUST SAYIN LOL
penury on Fri, 12th Sep 2014 9:28 am
I really hope that in a few years (months) we will still have some people around who remember how to perform less complex operations so that the world can continue to operate. Complexity may be good, but I am afraid it can also destroy us.
rockman on Fri, 12th Sep 2014 10:22 am
There is nothing happening in the area of monitoring production that hasn’t been going on for at least 20 years. And that guy sitting in Houston can’t see that trickle of oil running down the side of a well head. But the gauger who swings by every morning saw it and shut the well in before sand on the oil stream completely cut thru a union and a well netting $800,000 per month might have been lost for weeks…maybe even permamently.
The tech helps reporting efficiency for sure. But it will never be more important then boots on the ground. I could sit in my office and remotely monitor a logging operation 300 miles away . But by not being in the logging truck at 2 AM I can’t pick up the very subtle indicators of process. Indicators that might warn of the potential to lose $2 million worth of logging tools or even a potemtial blow out situation that could kill hands. I’m always there sitting there 4′ from the logging operator.
Consider the risk on the Macondo well that was acceptable to the BP suites sitting in Houston. Would they have felt the risk was acceptable if their lilly white asses had been on the drill floor? We call it “having skin in the game”. When I haul my crippled ass up into the logging truck no one questions why I’m there…I’m THE MAN. LOL.
Nony on Fri, 12th Sep 2014 11:22 am
A lot of the innovation is incremental, but that still helps. Rock, doesn’t get that. Also, opportunity drives research. Keep prices at $100/bbl and people will get better at extracting shale oil. Crash price to $30 and no one will bother working on that improvement. As it is now, companies like EOG and CLR and Range and service companies do a lot of DOEs and learn from them.
Northwest Resident on Fri, 12th Sep 2014 12:19 pm
Nony — You and Plantagent pack an awesome one-two punch when you’re both jumping in to lead the charge on technological ingenuity as applied to the “great promise” of shale oil extraction. Too bad shale oil extraction is totally dependent on conventional oil. No chance the world will ever run on shale oil — it can’t be extracted fast enough and it doesn’t contain enough energy. Shale has played a great role in keeping the barrel count up and drawing in the investor money to pump up the stock markets — but it is a big time money loser and nothing more than part of the grand BAU illusion — an illusion that will soon shatter into a million tiny pieces.
Nony on Fri, 12th Sep 2014 8:42 pm
NWR: you a twidget or a snipe?
Nony on Fri, 12th Sep 2014 9:41 pm
Monday, we will get another Bakken report. What do you bet it’s another nic production jump. Poor, poor peaker Rune. TOD is dead, dead, dead. And so much for Rune’s Red Queen anti-Bakken article.
Davy on Sat, 13th Sep 2014 7:45 am
NOO, you humor me. The doomers are walking all over your optimism. Then you come on here and puk Bakken results. The Bakken is an ass pimple. Why brag about and ass pimples?