Page added on October 13, 2011
“The harnessing of energy is what makes possible the world as we know it. But can we bet on that for the future?”
That’s the question Pulitzer-Prize winning author Daniel Yergin asks and attempts to answer in his new book The Quest: Energy, Security and the Remaking of the Modern World.
Yergin is “cautiously optimistic” about the future of energy, despite myriad risks, including geopolitics, terrorism, environmental change, rising demand from emerging economies and the rate of global investment in new supplies and new technologies.
Two of those issues – geopolitics and terrorism – are in focus today after the U.S. foiled an alleged plot by Iran to both kill the Saudi Ambassador and bomb Saudi and Israeli embassies. “As Iran continues to move down the path of nuclear weapons, it’s going to raise anxiety and tension,” Yergin says. “News of an Iranian plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador highlights the fundamental conflicts and regional tensions that are there. If Iran continues to move in the direction it’s going…at the very least you’ll get a nuclear arms race in the region.”
In the accompanying video, Yergin addresses the Iranian threat as well as the debate over whether the world is approaching peak oil. Contrary to popular misconception, peak oil does not mean the world is ‘running out of oil’ but that “the oil that’s left is progressively expensive, difficult, risky, marginal and fraught with secondary effects,” as Chris Nelder and Gregor Macdonald write onHarvard Business Review’s web site — a post written in response to Yergin’s recent WSJ op-ed There Will Be Oil.
“We certainly are moving past the era of cheap oil,” Yergin concedes. “[But] we do have major new supplies opening up,” including offshore Brazil, and the U.S. and Canadian oil sands as examples. “None of them can be considered ‘cheap oil’,” he continues. “That’s partly why we see higher floor under the price” of oil.
Whereas peak oil devotees consider Yergin wildly optimistic, the author and chairman of IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates calls himself “realistically confident.” Citing two-and-half centuries of innovation in energy development, “the one thing we’re not going to run short of is ingenuity and creativity,” Yergin says. “I think that’s the basis of our energy future.”
In addition, Yergin is confident in the power of the “feedbacks” from higher energy prices: “Price itself is important piece of information,” he says. “When prices [are] zooming up, demand goes down, people find alternatives, technology gets stimulated, and you get greater efficiency. ”
China, for example, has made energy efficiency a top priority as it seeks to slake its fast-growing thirst for oil, Yergin notes, an issue we’ll address in part two of this interview. Stay tuned.
4 Comments on "Daniel Yergin Interview: “We certainly are moving past the era of cheap oil”"
DC on Thu, 13th Oct 2011 6:09 am
Its pretty clear Yergin is buying the fake Iran Story planted by the CIA, as well as the Iran+nuclear weapons trope. Not that I felt he had much credibilty to begin with, he has even less now.
Dusko on Thu, 13th Oct 2011 3:36 pm
I can see the money being shoved under the table for this guy. Take him off the air and put Jim Kunstler in his place. He is far more informative and entertaining.
Kenz300 on Sun, 16th Oct 2011 3:08 pm
The era of cheap oil is over. Diversify, diversify, diversify. Don’t put all your eggs in the oil basket. Energy efficiency, conservation and alternative energy sources become more important as we move forward.
SOS on Sun, 16th Oct 2011 3:46 pm
Proponents of peak oil coninue to refine its meaning in an effort to at least appear to be factually supported. At one time PO meant no oil, we were running out. Production would peak and then fall off forever, prices would rise uncontrollably, chaos would insue and the world would end maybe even before global warming killed us all. Now PO seems to mean the end of cheap oil, which of course means nothing. All oil development is expensive and always has been. The big expense is of course the infrastructure needed to get equipment in and oil out. That can take a decade or more to put in place and its expensive. Once a field is discovered and developed the cost of the oil is much cheaper as the economy of scale is realized from the infrastructure investments. What you are seeing now is the front end costs of developing all the major finds in the world. It will take about 30 years to get the oil fields in North Dakota fully developed based on current well spacing regulations. Currently the front end investment makes things look expensive now but in 15 years things will look much better.