Page added on May 18, 2012
Australian shale explorers may be a decade away from producing oil and gas on a large scale because of obstacles ranging from a lack of drilling equipment to higher labor and infrastructure costs, Wood Mackenzie Ltd. said.
“The only factor that could change that significantly is if there’s a liquids-rich play that really drove the need to rapidly bring in the rigs,” Andrew McManus, the Sydney-based vice president of Australasia energy consulting at Wood Mackenzie, said in an interview. “Then you can see the value proposition and would want to fast-track that.”
Projects focusing on higher-priced oil and liquids may earn better returns and reach production faster, according to Wood Mackenzie and ConocoPhillips. (COP) In the U.S., the largest producer of the fuel, a supply glut has caused gas prices to slump and forced companies including BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP) and Royal Dutch Shell Plc to focus on extracting petroleum liquids.
“If you have liquids the economics are much, much better right now than a pure gas play that will take longer from an infrastructure standpoint,” Todd Creeger, president of ConocoPhillips’s Australian unit, said in a May 15 interview.
Energy companies will need to invest billions of dollars on projects to extract oil and gas trapped in Australian shale formations following about $600 million of commitments from companies including Conoco, Mitsubishi Corp. (8058) and Hess Corp. (HES), McManus from Wood Mackenzie said.
Santos Ltd. (STO), Beach Energy Ltd. (BPT) and Buru Energy Ltd. (BRU) are among explorers holding pieces of an estimated 400 trillion cubic feet of recoverable shale-gas resources in Australia, the U.S. Energy Information Administration said.
Australian Basins
The Cooper Basin straddling the borders of South Australia and Queensland states, the Georgina Basin in the country’s north and the Canning Basin in the west are shale regions with liquids potential, according to Wood Mackenzie.
ConocoPhillips, the third-largest U.S. oil company, is interested in further shale investments in Australia following a partnership last year with Perth-based New Standard Energy Ltd. (NSE), according to Creeger.
In the Canning, “we know there are liquids in the system, which is one thing we think will be key to the pace at which Australia develops shale,” Creeger said in Adelaide.
Oil in New York increased 9 percent from a year earlier to average $103.03 a barrel in the first quarter. Natural gas plunged 40 percent in the quarter compared with a year earlier to average $2.503 per million British thermal units. Crude oil fell 0.3 percent to $92.56 a barrel yesterday, while natural gas declined 0.9 percent to $2.594 per million Btu.
Rigs, Pipelines
Australian shale explorers face a number of challenges, including the lack of rigs, the remote location of their projects and insufficient pipeline networks, McManus said.
Hydraulic fracturing, in which water, sand and chemicals are pumped into the ground to break apart shale rock and release fossil fuels, has made the U.S. the largest natural-gas producer. The drilling technique, known as fracking, has drawn criticism from regulators and landowners concerned about water contamination and has been banned in France and Bulgaria.
The Obama administration earlier this month issued a proposed rule requiring disclosure of the chemicals used in the process when fracturing for oil and gas occurs on public lands.
7 Comments on "Australia Seen a Decade Away From Large-Scale Shale Production"
BillT on Fri, 18th May 2012 1:54 pm
Bloomberg propaganda for their oil advertisers and oil pimps.
“… may be a decade away …”
“… will need to invest billions of dollars …”
“… with liquids potential …”
“… a number of challenges …”
Although water was mentioned in passing, THAT will be the big challenge to this dream. There is already not enough water for crops. Certainly not billions of barrels to pump into holes with poisonous chemicals. This idea is dead on arrival. Australians are not as stupid as Americans.
Kenz300 on Fri, 18th May 2012 2:30 pm
We need safe, sane regulation of the oil and gas industries. There once was a time when rivers caught fire in America. We do not want our drinking water to catch fire.
Rick on Fri, 18th May 2012 3:13 pm
Hope you’re right BillT.
dsula on Fri, 18th May 2012 3:20 pm
>> BillT: Australians are not as stupid as Americans
Hahahahahahahahaha! Ahhhh. That’s a good one.
DC on Fri, 18th May 2012 5:02 pm
I hope so too, Australians are worried they wont have enough water to grow food and basic needs for cities due to Australias ever expanding population.(Over-immigration again) If there is barely enough to go around for that, there is NO way, the volumes of water requried for Aus tar-sands to operate. Canada gets away with it because Canada is still water-rich, in relative terms, but largely because of govt corruption and corproate collusion hides the true extent of the water usage of tar-sands and the pollution it creates downstream, and up for that mattter.
Desert continent Australia, does not have the luxury of diverting freshwater rivers to its version of the tar-sands. Turn the taps off to the farms and cities, and see what happens.
Shaved Monkey on Fri, 18th May 2012 11:11 pm
Unfortunately Australian’s are as stupid as everyone
There’s plenty of water in northern WA northern NSW and northern Qld.
and artesian water
http://www.osmoflo.com/project/13/water-to-sustain-oil-gas-operations-in-the-remote-cooper-basin.aspx
BillT on Sat, 19th May 2012 1:29 am
Shaved…funny you say that. Americans used to think that also. Now they are pumping the last out of the largest aquifer in the country and there are rivers that never get to the ocean. With the climates changing, Australia could be a total desert in a few decades. Think about that. Does Australia have the billions needed to build pipelines to move existing water to where it is needed for oil processing? I doubt it.