Page added on August 3, 2010
a new study calls into question whether coal will still be cheapest available source of energy by the time electric vehicles start making a major dent in the auto market. Could a looming shortage force our hand in replacing coal with nuclear energy and renewables?
In recent years, peak oil theory has received a lot of attention—and not just from the commodities gurus and conspiracy theorists who have been shouting warnings from the rooftops for decades. With global energy demand rising and countries like China and India on the cusp providing the world with billions of new consumers seeking something similar to the energy-thirsty “American way of life,” even the mainstream media has been known to throw the term out there from time to time. In fact, it’s possible that the consensus on peak oil has shifted in the last decade from a question of “if,” to one of “when.”
What hasn’t gotten as much attention in recent years though is the global supply of another fossil fuel that mankind relies upon to power its prosperity: Coal. About half of the electricity used in the United States comes from the burning of coal, and in other countries that number is often much higher. China relies on the fuel for more than 70 percent of its energy. But with international demand for coal expected to rise by nearly 50 percent by 2030, exactly how much of this finite resource is left to mine, and how long will it be until global production peaks?
According to a study by Tadeusz Patzek of the University of Texas and Gregory Croft of Berkeley, that day is a lot closer than anyone would imagine. Patzek and Croft are warning that after 2011, global production rates for coal will begin to decline—sinking to 1990 levels by 2037 and dropping to half of peak production by 2037. The paper also projects a corresponding decrease in emissions from coal, by an average of 2 percent per year.
Peak coal isn’t a new concept by any stretch, in fact it dates back to M. King Hubbert, the founder of peak oil theory. Using the same model he correctly used to forecast the decline of American oil production back in 1956, Hubbert predicted that global coal production would reach its apex in 2150. Since then, other researchers have placed the event closer and closer to the present day, with a 2007 study by the Energy Watch Group claiming that China will only be able to sustain its production trajectory until 2015.
4 Comments on "Study Warns ‘Peak Coal’ Could Be Just Years Away"
kenz300 on Tue, 3rd Aug 2010 9:06 pm
Scarce resources of oil, water, food, coal and other commodities with have a tremendous impact on global economies.
Resources that seemed plentiful in a world of 5 billion people will be shockingly scarce in a world or 9 billion people. Overpopulation and sustainability will collide.
The fight for resources will be ugly.
How many fish can you put in a fish tank before they consume all the resources and each other?
eastbay on Wed, 4th Aug 2010 1:21 am
The title might more accurately read, “Study Warns ‘Peak Coal’ Could Be Months Away”
2011 is five months from now. Not years away.
Bill Chaffee on Wed, 4th Aug 2010 9:28 am
It is my understanding that most of the energy in coal is nuclear energy in the form of thorium, with the second largest source being uranium. If a pound of uranium equals the chemical energy content of three million pounds of coal then coal only needs 1/3 of one part per million uranium in order for its nuclear energy to equal its chemical energy.
Bill Chaffee on Wed, 4th Aug 2010 12:27 pm
The point that I’m trying to make is the most wasted form of energy is nuclear energy. Early users of coal didn’t have a choice, however the problem now is mostly politics. Carter goaded Ford suspending reprocessing nuclear fuel five days before the 1976 election then he made it permanent. The technology for using much of the nuclear energy in coal could had been developed by now if it was for political obstacles.