Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on August 19, 2014

Bookmark and Share

The thick façade of civilization

The thick façade of civilization thumbnail

Most of the sky was clear and starry, but ten miles out to sea there was a cluster of clouds filled with lightning. I was anchored peacefully behind a low island that afforded me a perfect view of this dramatic spectacle. Sitting on the foredeck with my back against the mast, I sipped some hot sake and marveled at this exquisite display. Each burst of sky fire was contained within an individual cloud. Some would erupt in amber-colored brightness and others would shimmer in soft silver or lavender. The almost Japanese lantern quality of the clouds sparked a memory within me that I struggled to recall. A second cup of sake unlocked the remembrance vault, and the incident drifted back. It was a good one.

About a year earlier AVENTURA was nestled in a pristine cove with a few Indio houses scattered on the shore. One afternoon I heard the nearby children chattering enthusiastically about something. I took my binoculars topside and aimed them towards the commotion. The father was draping a fresh snakeskin over the low branch of a tree. My guess was that the kids were so excited because they would have fresh snake for dinner that evening. But my guess was delightfully wrong.

When nightfall arrived, the clearing around their little house filled with lightning bugs. That was a normal occurrence, but soon the little fireflies discovered the snakeskin, and slipped inside. Their pale neon green illumination created an eerie but magnificent tubular lantern. The children laughed with almost feral joy as they danced around this strange, blinking totem.

***

Watching this lightning now – and recalling those children then – was the catalyst for a slow, gentle, rice-wine contemplation of those qualities of human existence that are enduring and elemental as opposed to those that are temporary and superficial. I wondered how many generations ago that Indio family had discovered that lightning bugs were attracted to snake skins. And I pondered how many generations into the future that folk wisdom would endure. But the more profound question that I considered was whether these self-reliant indigenous people would remain long after the hyper-dependent gringos had vanished. If so, it seemed like poetic and ethical justice.

***

As the modern world careens from one catastrophe to another, a rarely-questioned phrase keeps appearing in print and in conversation. Here is an example of it in common usage: “If the gap between the haves and the have-nots keeps deepening, the thin veneer of civilization could easily be torn apart.” Allow me to question the foundation of this aphorism that we accept so readily. The implication is that if certain societal conditions deteriorate, then huge numbers of people will revert to their natural, uncivilized state which is immoral savagery. I don’t just beg to differ, I insist on differing.

The living arrangement that we refer to as Civilization with a capital C, only arose about 10,000 years ago with the advent of Agriculture with a capital A. The hallmark of this change was that these Neolithic people began domesticating a few crops and a few types of animals. Prior to this, everyone survived through hunting and gathering. And this mode of living did not just span 10,000 years – it lasted for about 10,000 generations. Mostly, it was small bands of about 50 people who lived a co-operative existence where everyone shared the blessings that nature provided. Obviously, if the ethical code of these Paleolithic humans had been immoral savagery, they would not have survived for 200,000 years.

For many decades white male anthropologists tried to convince the world that indigenous people were merely sub-human primitives who deserved to be subdued by the superior white race. They did so to justify the slaughter of millions of First Peoples whose lands and resources were also stolen. So who are the “immoral savages” in such a scenario?

And if such hideous genocidal conduct is not bad enough, let’s examine the way of life of those who were conquered, and compare it with the lifestyle of those who destroyed them. I’ll begin by describing some of the characteristics of tribal living:

· The First peoples understood that Life is a web and all of the interlocking strands are essential to the integrity of the whole. They realized that the geometry of Earth is not a pyramid with humanity at the apex – ordained to rule over all else Instead, they knew that the well-being of their brother and sister creatures and of the forests, rivers and jungles that cocooned them, were of vital importance to the entire planetary dance of life.

· There was superb equality amongst the sexes with the women fully involved in the decision making.

· They understood the wisdom of limits. They did not deplete their hunting and foraging grounds, they limited their population, and they killed only when it was imperative for their survival. They embraced a life of harmony with their neighbors rather than hegemony over them.

· Indigenous tribes were not divided into rulers and ruled. And there were no rich and poor. All shared equally in the spoils of the hunt.

· These people were phenomenally fit and healthy as revealed through modern archaeology and as verified by the anthropologists living amongst the several dozen tribes that have escaped extinction. In fact, after only a few centuries of agriculture, the human skeleton had shrunken by about 6 inches because they switched to a cultivated grain diet rather than the mixed protein, fat and vegetable Paleolithic diet.

· They are blissfully happy – as the contemporary anthropologists report. Because they are in such harmony with each other and with the natural world that sustains them, they always feel like they are “home.”

Now let me contrast that hunter/gatherer culture with how daily living arrangements changed after the arrival of Agriculture – or what I more accurately call “Conquest Agriculture.” I prefer this derogatory term because the early Neanderthals used a “scorched earth” farming practice of destroying anything that was a threat to their crops or domesticated animals.

When big C Civilization arrived, it brought domestication not just to crops and farm animals, but also to the average person. Instead of being wild and feral and self-sufficient, humanity was reduced to dependency and servitude. This was instituted through “division of labor.” Instead of everyone knowing how to feed and clothe and shelter themselves, people were obligated to specialize in just one skill. The vast majority tilled the fields, while others made tools or pottery or baskets – or in the case of the military – they made dead people!

What also arrived with division of labor was hierarchy of power. Suddenly rulers appeared, and unfortunately, those at the top did not achieve that status by being the wisest and most compassionate. They gained prominence by being the most ruthless and immoral. To enforce their edicts, standing armies arrived on the scene. The elites were also served by a class of courtiers or middle managers. And finally the new phenomenon of “priests” appeared. They quickly realized that they could attach themselves to kings or pharaohs for mutual benefit. The religious potentate could demonize certain groups of people to justify their imperial conquest by the secular leader and his army.

So, the hunter/gatherer’s life of free-roaming self-sufficiency was soon displaced by mud-hut, impoverished slavery. Thus from the very outset it was a disastrous development for the vast majority of people. And now let me list some of the historical legacies of Civilization as it wreaked its havoc down the centuries. This is an utterly staggering inventory of pathologies that did not exist in the tribal societies that were exterminated, and is not found in the few dozen that have survived.

· Slavery
· Insanity
· Torture
· Human Sacrifice
· Genocide
· Plagues
· Chronic Loneliness
· Industrial War
· Laws
· Obesity
· Homicidal Dictators
· Asylums
· Heart Attacks
· Lawyers
· Crusades
· Atomic Bombs
· Cancer
· Poverty
· Inquisitions
· Diseases of Civilization
· Witch-hunts
· Drones
· Suicide Bombers
· Drug Addiction
· Taxes
· Robot Soldiers
· Bankers
· Missionaries
· Junk Food
· Overpopulation
· Sweat Shops
· Famine
· Disparity of Wealth
· Sexual Deviancy
· Child Molesters
· Serial Killers
· Compulsive Consumption
· Extinction of Species

It is hard to imagine any rational human being reading that list of atrocities and not saying to themselves, “Why have these consequences of Civilization never been brought to my attention?” That sensible question brings us back to the title of this essay: “The Thick Façade of Civilization.” Here is the standard dictionary definition for the word “façade”: “an outward appearance that is maintained to conceal a less pleasant reality.” Civilization is so toxic to human and animal and planetary well-being, that its true nature must be hidden from people.

And those in charge of the planet – the gatekeepers – or what I prefer to call The Malignant Overlords – do an extraordinary job of keeping that knowledge suppressed. You will never hear “the Downside of Civilization” discussed in the mainstream media or from pulpits or in the classroom. Therefore, the possibility of modern mass society reforming itself backwards towards a more holistic mode of living lightly and sustainably on the Earth is nearly impossible. Even when a major political or economic system is abandoned because of its uselessness, the underlying foundation of Civilization is not allowed to be questioned.

My belief is that only if there is a planet-wide collapse, can the prospect of smaller, tribal-based communities re-emerge. That is why I have dedicated great effort to sharing and refining my concept known as the Sea Gypsy Tribe. (Here is the direct link.) But I emphasize that I do not desire this scenario, since it would involve a massive die-off. But if the worst should occur, I feel it wise to have some concrete strategy for rebuilding a world that might possibly bequeath our descendents Mozart without the Mushroom Cloud.

***

After a couple of hours of savoring the lightning-lush sky, the clouds dispersed and suddenly revealed a handsome, half-moon. Somehow it seemed like there was a message in its appearance. As I contentedly sipped my sake, I searched for some meaning. Then it jolted me. Perhaps the universe was reminding me of what is ephemeral and what is enduring. The magnificent lightning show represented the amazing, electro-hypnotic spell of Civilization. But it swiftly was gone. Whereas the moon rising, as it has done for millions of years, symbolizes that less transitory epoch, when humanity lived in harmony with the planet and its creatures and the inscrutable vastness beyond us.

And perhaps one day that era may return…

club orlov



25 Comments on "The thick façade of civilization"

  1. Northwest Resident on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 10:48 am 

    That list is incomplete. Software developers should be added to the list, somewhere between Human Sacrifice and Sweat Shops.

  2. JuanP on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 11:33 am 

    I could write a much longer list with little effort. I just wanted to boast about it! 😉

  3. Plantagenet on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 11:50 am 

    You could write an even longer list about the miseries of living in a primitive hunter-gatherer culture.

    I’m always amused at the romantics who imagine things will be great if only we can get rid of civilization, while simultaneously living a life of luxury thanks to the benefits of civilization.

  4. JuanP on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 12:02 pm 

    Plant, I am not a romantic, but we have gone overboard and are destroying the biosphere at a very fast rate. I go camping, fishing, woodcrafting, and rafting every week. I do not romanticize living in the outdoors, I spend too much time outdoors to possibly remain romantic about nature. Nature is hot and cold, wet, dirty, and a cruel bitch and will kill you easily if you are careless, but has provided us throughout our existence as humans everything we needed to survive and get to this point.
    Now we have the power to destroy the balance natural ecosystems took billions of years to create. I think we are being arrogant in this respect, that’s all.

  5. Davy on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 12:25 pm 

    Damn. not one word from Or-love on the devil America though we know the evil one was in his thoughts when he wrote this.

  6. Davy on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 12:31 pm 

    BS, Planter, the native Americans of the bison cultures as an example had significantly better lives then civilizations now or then had by a wide margin if one compares the +’s & -‘s combine those and measure the results. That is pre-blue eye’d devil white’s.

  7. Plantagenet on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 12:44 pm 

    BS Davy.

    The native Amerians of the bison cultures practiced slavery. What is it about slavery that you find so appealing?

  8. Plantagenet on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 12:52 pm 

    @JuanP

    Its nice that on weekends you drive to an RV park in your Winnebago, but that is not that same as living a traditional hunter gatherer lifestyle. Try living outside for a year without any modern equipment or food and then tell me how great it was. And no bug spray or unerwear either.

  9. Davy on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 12:54 pm 

    Planter, read some current events and read some history friend and then get back to me with your thoughts. There is more overt and hidden slavery now then during the pre-European Native American period.

  10. Plantagenet on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 1:04 pm 

    @Davy

    You are the one who said you like Plains Indian cultures which practiced slavery. Please answer the question—what is it about slavery that you find so appealing?

  11. Davy on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 1:15 pm 

    Planter, move on with your mind games your boring us.

  12. Plantagenet on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 1:25 pm 

    Davy You are the one who said you like Plains Indian cultures which practiced slavery. I’m simply asking you to explain—what is it about slavery you find so appealing?

    Or is it possible that when you said you admired the “bison cultures” you had a comic-book level understanding of their cultures, and just weren’t aware that they practiced slavery?

    Thats my point—people who say they want to live a hunter-gatherer lifestyle are envisioning a comic-book fantasy. The reality is that kind of life is typically mean, brutish and short.

  13. strummer on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 1:34 pm 

    “They did not deplete their hunting and foraging grounds”

    Yeah, except for this little thing called the Pleistocene extinction, where they slaughtered almost all the megafauna species in just a few thousand years after expanding out of Africa.

  14. JuanP on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 2:28 pm 

    Plant, I hike and bike mostly on my Packrafting trips, these are the rafts we have, they are 5 pounds each, one for me and one for my wife.
    https://www.alpackaraft.com/index.cfm/store.catalog/Packrafts/
    I can carry my rafting, camping, fishing, and hiking items on my backpack or bike bags, and carry my backpack and bike on my raft. Check out these:
    https://www.google.com/search?q=packrafting&rlz=1C9BKJA_enUS590US590&espv=1&hl=en-US&tbm=isch&tbo=u&sboxchip=Images&source=univ&sa=X&ei=L6XzU6nrEsfyoATIwYHIAQ&ved=0CDkQ7Ak&biw=1024&bih=748

  15. Plantagenet on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 2:49 pm 

    JuanP Congrats on your packraft trips. Packrafts are fantastic. I’ve got a fleet of six inflatable kayaks–three Metzlers, a Nautirid, and two Sunboats, -messing about in small boats is one of my favorites things. I just finished a week-long canoe trip between Eagle and Circle on the Yukon River using Norwegian folding Ally canoes—another great high-tech outdoor toy.

    However, my point is that hunter and gatherers didn’t have packrafts and they didn’t have Ally folding canoes or Metzlers or Feathercraft kayaks or floatplanes or MSR stoves or zodiacs or outboard motors or down jackets or nylon tents. Hunter gatherers didn’t even have toilet paper.

  16. JuanP on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 3:06 pm 

    Plant, cool toys! I got the point. I can make do with very little, but don’t deny the pleasure of a shower when I come back. I am also into primitive technologies, bushcraft, woodcraft, and survival skills, have been all my life, but I wouldn’t want to have to live without a machete or large knife in the jungles I get into on a weekly basis. Without a machete I’d have a hard time here, but other than that if there were less people I could make do.
    I did live outdoors on the rough for several years in my late teens and early twenties while I hiked and backpacked across the Americas without a penny, so I know what it is like to be outdoors and focused on survival. I wouldn’t mind being homeless alone, but not with my wife.

  17. Joe Clarkson on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 3:08 pm 

    “Obviously, if the ethical code of these Paleolithic humans had been immoral savagery, they would not have survived for 200,000 years.”

    Ethical codes vary tremendously and cannot be directly correlated with a population’s survival. There has always been plenty of ‘unethical’ behavior.

    Recent studies have indicated that about one out of eight Paleolithic men died of violence at the hands of others. Villages in adjacent valleys in the New Guinea highlands had so little friendly contact with each other that they developed several hundred separate languages. Almost all of their interaction was through warfare.

    Hunter gatherer populations that are in equilibrium with their food supply are often violently protective of their turf. Some of the most warlike people in history lived on small tropical islands where food was limited. In extreme climates, such as the Arctic, infanticide was necessary to adjust the ratio of the sexes to optimize food gathering capabilities.

    All of these examples show that people have had plenty of capacity for ‘bad’ behavior all over the world and throughout human history. One could also compile a long list of altruistic and mutually supportive norms for all cultures, old or new.

    There is no need to romanticize either primitive cultures or the comforts of modern civilization. I have seen both of those kinds of life and can attest that people can be just as happy being hunter gatherers as being suburban soccer moms. I think we need to keep that in mind as our living circumstances change.

  18. Davy on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 3:15 pm 

    Juan, give it up planter wart is delusional with cornucopian allusions of grandeur of the achievements of modern man when in reality we have become degenerates with little in the way of mental and physical strength in comparison to the pre whites of North America. Many of these cultures had a rich and varied existence in a highly complex higher order ecosystem. If their lives were short and brutish this is only in comparisons to the mental and spiritual pussies that walk around pretending to be higher level humans today that live maybe 20 yrs more in nursing homes. When in fact modern men are part of a plague species that is brutish, cruel, and destructive. It is types like the planter that ensure no top down reforms will be made ensuring all of our lives may get shortish soon.

  19. Pops on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 3:28 pm 

    Great post Joe.

    I sometimes find it hard to understand why there is so much talk about the pleasures of the simple life on the internet.

    As to orlov’s post, I wonder where the epiphany came for those evil anthropologists who cosigned the mores of their time that “natives” should be exterminated? Why is it now that those societies are dead (and out of the way) that they are celebrated?

    I blame it on Ishmael (the monkey) LOL

  20. JuanP on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 4:28 pm 

    Davy, have you seen this over at Resilience. You mentioned Savory earlier, IIRC.
    http://www.resilience.org/stories/2014-08-19/the-savory-institute-conference-on-grassland-management

  21. Davy on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 6:59 pm 

    Thanks Juan, the grassland holistic restoration with animals is what I am doing. I am also a big follower of FEASTA. FEASTA is where I found my Korowicz inspiration.

  22. Energy Investor on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 7:30 pm 

    Life in the days Orlov speaks of was hard, short and brutal.

    In the early 1980s Maori tribes were accustomed to killing, eating and enslaving their enemies as they lived an a warrior existence.

    Slaves were dispatched and eaten during winter whenever food was in short supply.

    Folk who return to a prepper existance can report on how much easier or harder it is for them, but at my age – well past the time when “primitives” would die – I would not be able to cope with the hard physical work.

    Anyways, how would I pay my medical bills…

  23. Makati1 on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 8:46 pm 

    The facade he mentions is crumbling. Soon we may, no, WILL all get to experience life without. Ferguson is only the beginning in the USSA. As for the rest of the world, we shall see.

  24. sparky on Tue, 19th Aug 2014 11:43 pm 

    .
    This civilisation versus the wild life miss a point , the sum of happiness in an human life is usually constant
    modern living has increased the comfort by increasing the energy use

    that’s fine ,however the other face of the coin is that discomfort will increase when the energy become scarce

    it’s all about change and transition , but once we are in a stable society people will live , there will be good times and there will be bad ones

  25. Makati1 on Wed, 20th Aug 2014 2:33 am 

    sparky, you assume that there will be a ‘stable’ society’. Perhaps if a few thousand of us survive the coming bottleneck, we will be hunter-gatherers again. I don’t see a much better future as long as there are warmongering nations with nukes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *