Page added on June 19, 2014
Mason Inman recently posted an excellent 2012 interview he conducted with James Schlesinger, our nation’s first Secretary of Energy, who passed away shortly before that posting. [Quotes here are from that interview.] There are some lessons available to all of us.
Mr. Schlesinger was a bit more direct than I and others have been in urging more effort from the public to recognize the challenges ahead. Sometimes the truth is just the truth, plain as can be. While we’d all like to believe/hope/wish that the bigger problems can be handled by others without our involvement, life tends not to work that way very often.
Reality is what it is, and if we are going to prepare ourselves for inevitable changes which will certainly affect each and every one of us even though that may not be at all clear today, then we all need to step up and learn just a little bit more about those challenges and why that matters so much right now.
As the interview makes clear, hardships and sacrifices aren’t usually the first (or thirtieth) message the public wants to hear from elected officials. Understandable, but of benefit usually in the moment only. Soothing words can only hold back inevitabilities for so long. The wisdom comes from recognizing that, and then having the courage to deal with it all.
The two men address this directly.
Mason Inman: So what do you think is the answer to that? Does it require a grassroots effort to get the politicians to change?
James Schlesinger: Well, if the public changed, the politicians would change. The problem is the public. The public does not want to hear about this—because this is an acknowledgement that prices are going to go up, and that they’re going to have more problems running their automobiles than they want….The political process is very sensitive to telling the people what they want to hear, right?…
Mason Inman: Do you have much hope that Americans might plan ahead for these problems you’ve been warning about the past several years?
James Schlesinger: No, nothing’s going to happen until reality hits them between the eyes like a two-by-four.
That’s one option of course. Delaying that seems wise, but only up until the moment one realizes that it might actually be the worst choice of all. Of course, awareness of that truth requires the proper dissemination of accurate and complete information. That’s been an ongoing problem—the primary motivation for this blog.
James Schlesinger: There is a difficulty for the public to distinguish between reality and what they are promised in political rhetoric.
Mason Inman: I think that’s the job of journalists to help with that, but I don’t think they’ve been doing a very good job on the issue of peak oil.
James Schlesinger: … the [fossil fuel] industry really does not want to publicize the fact that oil production is not going to be available in the future the way it has been in the past. Even if we don’t have a peak, we have a plateau at some point. And a plateau, with the Chinese and Indians using more and more oil, and other developing nations using more oil, there will be less oil for the developed nations. So, the consequence is that you’re going to have to get by with less, even if you have a plateau.
Seems fairly straightforward, doesn’t it?
While great effort is expended by too many to spin the facts and steer the public away from the logical and inevitable consequences of dealing with finite resources called upon to satisfy greater demand by more people in a more technologically-advanced world, there’s an end-point to those tactics. And unfortunately, as unpleasant and harsh as acknowledging that may be, dealing with the realities of it all without having done much if any preparation or planning in advance will only make the unpleasant much worse.
A choice, of course. Not a a good one, but it’s available.
I’ll have a few more thoughts on Inman’s great piece the next time.
For more info on Mason Inman and his upcoming book, see this.
5 Comments on "Peak Oil: This One Is On Us # 1"
rockman on Thu, 19th Jun 2014 12:26 pm
James and I appear to be in agreement: the public gets the politicians they elect. Folks like to blame a certain politician or party for every problem. Tiresome IMHO. Blame the voters that elected politicians that make bad choices. But that would be blaming ourselves, wouldn’t it? That would be just plain silly.
Westexasfanclub on Thu, 19th Jun 2014 5:36 pm
“even when we don’t have a peak, we have a plateau at some point”
May I add that the plateau arrived in 2004 and that oil exports peaked in 2005? That simply means that by then peak oil hit all the oil importing countries in the world.
Makati1 on Thu, 19th Jun 2014 9:32 pm
rockman is correct as usual. Over half of our Federal elected “representatives” are millionaires, or will be by the time they retire. They have no interest in the average voter unless there is something in it for themselves. After all, only psychopaths who desire power and influence, run for office today. There are no ‘part-time politicians as there were in the beginning. Now some have to die in office before they are replaced, because, again, they give the greedy sheeple something in return like jobs or a better school, or favorable taxes, etc..
As for peak oil, if I had a peso for every article, pro and con, that has been or will be published since 2005, I would be able to buy more hectares for our farm…lol. I don’t even read most anymore. The comments are more interesting.
Tom on Fri, 20th Jun 2014 8:01 am
I think there are fantastic opportunities in a future with highly diversified decentralized energy production. And, that is a path to selling the public. My small community, and surrounding area, spends approximately $100,000,000 on energy every year. And most of that energy money leaves the community. If we can change that number by 1%, it is like bringing a $1,000,000 business into our community with no increase in infrastructure cost. Highly diversified renewable energy is a good investment that will have a positive effect on local economies and will change the distribution of wealth. And that will change politics. I’m not so sure it is just the public. Powerful industries and our politicians have ample reason for not telling or selling the truth.
Davy, Hermann, MO on Fri, 20th Jun 2014 8:57 am
Tom, what you say is my hope too but I also preach low cost, simple, robust, low power. Adapting as much as possible to variable supply to increase efficiency and simplicity. Attitude and lifestyle changes are a prerequisite. This drastic alternative AltE vision will be only brought on by crisis. Your vision is nonetheless what we have now and should be perused with the current BAU paradigm. Yet, with BAU on the knife edge of collapse this path is precarious at best for a stable long term lifeboat. AltE attempting to perpetuate BAU is not the same as AltE in preparation for collapse. The equipment is similar the applications and needs differ. The transition you mention needed to be done 20 years ago. Time is not on our side. Every home in your community could be wired up with what I am promoting for the price of a large solar farm or wind farm attempting to integrate to an obsolete grid system designed for mainline power. The global system is broke surviving on debt. Capex will not last and mega investments have little time to see the light of day.