Page added on January 18, 2005
Simplifying The Case Against Cheney is a new article posted at www.fromthewilderness.com whch sumarizes the details Mike Ruppert published in his recent book Crossing the Rubicon indicating that Cheney played and active part in orchestrating the 911 responses to ensure that there were no effective countermeasures taken to forestall or defeat the attacks.
According to this article Cheney knew about Peak Oil and the attacks were needed to allow the US to start a war of conquest in the Middle East to gain control of the world’s remaining prime source of oil. In other words the 911 attack functioned as the “New Pearl Harbor ” the neo-cons appeared to be hoping for in the Project For A New American Century (PNAC) document Rebuilding America’s Defenses
The article details Cheney’s involvement in running live hijacking exercises and war games on 911 which had the apparent effect of causing confusion in the FAA and NORAD and a misallocation of fighter jet resources away from the North East air corridors. Together it all worked to delay responses by the US authorities to the real hijackings.
Crossing the Rubicon. Simplifying the case against Dick Cheney
by
Michael Kane
In an argument of over 600 pages and 1,000 footnotes, Crossing the Rubicon makes the case for official complicity within the U.S. government and names Dick Cheney as the prime suspect in the crimes of 9/11. Since the publication of this book (to which I had the privilege of contributing a chapter), many people have asked to hear the case against Cheney argued “short & sweet.”
I will make it as short as possible, but it can never be sweet. There are 3 major points made within this book that are crucial to proving Cheney’s guilt. I shall first list them and then go on to prove each point as laid out in Crossing the Rubicon.
Crossing the Rubicon. Simplifying the case against Dick Cheney
Leave a Reply