Register

Peak Oil is You


Donate Bitcoins ;-) or Paypal :-)


Page added on March 4, 2013

Bookmark and Share

David Frum: ‘Peak oil’ doomsayers proved wrong

General Ideas

Remember “peak oil”?

Five years ago, some oil market speculators became convinced that the world was nearing the limits of oil production. Sometime soon — the 2010s? the 2020s? — oil production would begin a long steady decline.

Think again. World oil production continues to rise. Leading the oil renaissance: the United States. The International Energy Agency predicts that the United States will overtake Saudi Arabia and Russia to become (again!) the world’s leading oil producer by 2017. If the agency’s estimates prove correct, the United States and Canada together will become net energy exporters by about 2030, and the U.S., which uses 20% of the world’s energy, will achieve energy self-sufficiency by the mid-2030s.

David Frum

David Frum

Predictions that the world would imminently “run out of oil” have been worrying oil consumers since at least the 1920s. They always prove wrong, for reasons explained by the great oil economist M.A. Adelman after the last “oil shortage” in the 1970s:

Oil reserves, Adelman writes, “are no gift of nature. They (are) a growth of knowledge, paid for by heavy investment.”

For all practical purposes, the world’s supply of oil is not finite. It is more like a supermarket’s supply of canned tomatoes. At any given moment, there may be a dozen cases in the store, but that inventory is constantly being replenished with the money the customers pay for the cans they remove, and the more tomatoes that customers buy, the bigger an inventory the store will carry.

Someday, of course, consumers will decide they want less oil at the current price. Someday we may move beyond oil altogether. When that day comes, the investment will stop — and nobody will ever know or care how much oil remains in the ground.

Become a fan of CNNOpinion

Stay up to date on the latest opinion, analysis and conversations through social media. Join us at Facebook/CNNOpinion and follow us @CNNOpinion on Twitter. We welcome your ideas and comments.

Adelman’s assessment is being corroborated once more, this time in Mexico. Mexican oil production has been declining over the past decade, mostly because of under-investment and mismanagement by the state oil monopoly, Pemex. (On January 31, a deadly tragedy reminded the world of Pemex’s troubles when a methane leak in a Pemex building in downtown Mexico City exploded, killing more than 30 people and injuring 120 others.)

In October, Pemex announced discovery of a big new field in the Gulf of Mexico. Newly elected Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto is urging his country to amend its constitution to allow foreign investment in Mexican oil fields. Experts assess that opening the Mexican oil industry to global investment will revive Mexican oil production and boost Mexico’s economic growth by potentially 2 points a year. Nieto’s PRI party — the very party that nationalized Mexican oil 80 years ago — is expected to vote this weekend to approve the new policy.

Meanwhile, the International Energy Agency is warning oil markets to ready themselves for a “flood” of cheap oil from Iraq. Last year, Iraq for the first time exceeded pre-1990 oil production. The agency expects Iraq eventually to overtake Russia as the world’s second-largest oil exporter.

In 1972, the year of the famous “Limits to Growth” report by the Club of Rome, the world produced about 55 million barrels of oil per day. In 2011, the world produced almost 80 million barrels. If today’s prices hold, many experts expect production of 90 million barrels by decade’s end.

Our oil problem is not that “we’re running out.” Our oil problem is that we’re producing so much of the stuff that we are changing the planet’s climate.

Yet on the environmental front too, there’s reason for optimism. One of the technologies developed by the oil industry — fracking — has made available vast new supplies of cheap natural gas. Gas has become so cheap that it can be substituted for coal as an electricity-generating fuel. In just eight years, coal’s share of the U.S. electricity market has tumbled from one-half to one third — and still falling. Gas emits only half the carbon per unit of energy of coal. The transition from coal to gas explains why U.S. carbon emissions declined 8% from 2011 to 2012, reaching the lowest level since 1992.

Soon the United States and Canada will be producing so much gas that they can export it to Europe, perhaps also to China, helping to cut carbon emissions in those economies as well. No, it’s not the answer to everything: Gas still emits carbon. But it’s an improvement — and that’s how progress comes.

Instead of fantasizing about catastrophes (running out of oil) and miracles (a rapid transition to solar power), our energy thinking needs to emphasize the achievable and the incremental. Convert from coal to gas. Tax gasoline to induce people to live closer to work and to buy more fuel-efficient cars.

We can enjoy a rising quality of life with declining energy inputs. Put us on the path to the right kind of “peak oil” — and peak carbon — the peak that comes, not because we find less and less, but because we want less and less.

CNN



15 Comments on "David Frum: ‘Peak oil’ doomsayers proved wrong"

  1. keith on Mon, 4th Mar 2013 6:16 pm 

    No mention of climate change or EROEI? He is not well schooled in this area. If each country of world kept their own oil supply for themselves the U.S. would’ve collapsed in 1970. With bribes, assassinations, coups, and illegal wars the U.S. by Frum’s assessment has never peaked.

  2. jodell8964 on Mon, 4th Mar 2013 6:48 pm 

    What type of sh*t is this David Frum on!!! Man, I’ve got to get my hands on that sh*t along with the rose coloured glasses as well….

  3. J-Gav on Mon, 4th Mar 2013 7:37 pm 

    Right … Adelman, Frum, the kind of people who are always going be crawling out from under Shill Rock (or is that now ‘shale’?) to spout something on how incredibly lucky we are to have such an unlimited amount of this or that … These guys don’t get ‘Earth Science,’ only pushers for our present unsustainable fix. Exporting LNG would be just one more really stupid idea, as if our endowment was, like, forever. (Un)holy smokes!

  4. PrestonSturges on Mon, 4th Mar 2013 7:44 pm 

    Canadian David Frum has always pushed the fossil fuel industry/neocon line of President Cheney (ooops vice president) and was a big advocate of invading Iraq.

    Sometimes I turn on Marketplace on the radio and there is a commentary that makes me say “Who is that lunatic?” and it’s Frum.

  5. PrestonSturges on Mon, 4th Mar 2013 7:52 pm 

    It should not even be necessary to point out he’s lumping kerogen in with “available reserves.”

  6. dave thompson on Mon, 4th Mar 2013 11:11 pm 

    From CNN need we say more?

  7. Beery on Mon, 4th Mar 2013 11:14 pm 

    I wonder what folks like him are going to do when their predictions of limitless oil reserves are proved wrong? I suspect they’ll just keep pretending they never claimed anything of the sort.

  8. Cloud9 on Mon, 4th Mar 2013 11:35 pm 

    Many will have collected their fees and retired to their bunkers.

  9. Bill on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 1:00 am 

    After reading the canned tomatoes anology. I almost stopped reading. But no, as paiful as it was I continued. I now wish I did not.

    Another reason to hate CNN. Can they ever tell the straight truth?

  10. Harquebus on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 2:09 am 

    Oil ain’t tomatoes, U$ gas is so cheap that it is only investment dollars that is keeping the industry going and economies can not support high oil prices.

  11. jedaii on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 2:19 am 

    CNN will always say they are live reporting somewhere in the Middle East or elsewhere, wherein fact reporters are just in their AC studio parroting…

    Let’s pretend we believe them. LOL.

  12. SilentRunning on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 4:11 am 

    Actually, Frum, given that oil is still north of $100 a barrel, it is clear that Peak Oil Theory is correct, and that you are nothing but a cheap corporate whore.

  13. Bloomer on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 5:25 am 

    People can say or believe what they want. I prefer to observe and make my own opinion. What I see is a global economy that can’t get out of second gear.
    The catalyst of global growth is relatively inexpensive abundant energy. If we were awashed in oil then why the economic malaise? The peak oil theory which was started by insider petro geologists pretty much have laid out how declining oil fields will impact our way of life. Clinging to the past and hoping that a bunch of oily rocks will save us is a waste of time and resources. Message to Frum..read a book!

  14. Kenjamkov on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 9:23 am 

    All that coal that the US is “not” using is going to Asia. So is that good for the environment then?

    We produce way more oil than we did when it was $10/b, that is why it is $100/b… wait… that doesn’t work hmm… can I get a shill job too?

  15. PrestonSturges on Tue, 5th Mar 2013 4:46 pm 

    >>>We produce way more oil than we did when it was $10/b, that is why it is $100/b… wait…

    We are of course producing 50% less at $100.

    To listen to these guys you’d think US oil production hadn’t started declining 40 years ago

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *