by FarmMama » Sun 15 May 2005, 20:36:46
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', ':')!:
2) Another reason why such communities would fail : They would be ripe targets and the type of individuals who would form them would be the hippie, non-violent types (see authors of previous dissenting posts). Much as I like hippies, they dont have a real great instinct for survival. Likewise, those communities composed of violent types would have neither the intellectual capacity nor the skills in cooperation to maintain ANY level of technology. Mixing the 2 types of people into one community (either voluntarily or involuntarily) would invariably turn the first type of community into the second, making it non-viable.
Wow. Now I admit, I've been called a hippie before, even by my own family (gasp!).
One of the things I've learned in my lifetime is that before I can care for anything else (including the earth) I need to care for myself. After all, you can't give away what you yourself don't possess, eh? After a lifetime of aquiring a healthly level of self esteem and self empowerment I found that I also wound up with a rather keen sense of self-preservation. I won't go into detail about the firearms I own, but I assure you that after considering the situations and circumstances to their myriad conclusions I have no problem pulling the trigger. I also feel it would be highly unlikely that it would ever occur. I'm sure there will be violence in the cities, but from where I sit, most people would die of a heart attack just trying to get to my little speck of dirt.
Your comments assume much, koch. Either you don't get out much or you're using stereotypes instead of first hand knowledge.