Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

What would happen if Everything crashed?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 04 Apr 2005, 16:41:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yavicleus', '
')
I'm just curious, what do you do?


I'm a self-employed artist/craftsperson. I make artificial animals, puppets, and costumes for motion pictures, TV, live shows, etc. I sometimes have to work long days on a tight deadline, but it averages out to be only a couple hours a day of actual work.
Ludi
 

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 02:51:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('0mar', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'A') society of non workers has been tried.
Its called Communism.
And it invariably fails.


if you think Soviet style communism was even close to communism you have a lot to learn.


I dont recall mentioning *any* specific example. Simply saying Communism will always fail. Its inevitable. On paper its simply the best system you could have, but in reality its just a miserable failure.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 03:38:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '
') On paper its simply the best system you could have, but in reality its just a miserable failure.
Now you're really disappointing me Specop. It stinks on paper. Remember the 'dictatorship of the proletariate'? The so-called transition phase to the classless society turns out to be not so transitory - and it isn't even the 'proletariate' anyway but a bunch of priviledged party hacks and cutthroats as an inevitable result of the theory itself. Jeez, some malicious delusions die hard.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 05:00:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '
') On paper its simply the best system you could have, but in reality its just a miserable failure.
Now you're really disappointing me Specop. It stinks on paper. Remember the 'dictatorship of the proletariate'? The so-called transition phase to the classless society turns out to be not so transitory - and it isn't even the 'proletariate' anyway but a bunch of priviledged party hacks and cutthroats as an inevitable result of the theory itself. Jeez, some malicious delusions die hard.


Ok, which system do you think trumps Communism (on paper anyways)?
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby bart » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 05:26:08

I'm not exactly sure how we got from JD's original post about "Life without Work" to communism. But here's a comment on both of them.

Re: communism
If Peak Oil proceeds as many people on this board predict, we will see a return of working class militancy and a wide spectrum of leftist movements. Inflation, a falling currency, rising energy costs -- all these will cause popular discontent, if history is a guide. Fascist movements are also a possibility. In any case, we'll see a return of strong central governments to manage the crises.

Our philosophies and political systems were developed over the last 200 years of fossil fuel economies; we are poised for the long descent to a solar economy. As economic and technological conditions change, our ideas will change.

Re: Life without work
Great thread, JD. I think there's a good chance that people will work less, but not because of government policy. Rather it will be joblessness due to economic disruption, as in the Great Depression. Governments will see that people don't go hungry -- otherwise they will face revolution.

People may not have jobs, but they won't be idle!

People will find a place in the informal economy, just as in 3rd World countries with high unemployment. People (especially women) will garden to make sure their families have healthy food and to earn some extra cash. Factories that have been closed may be taken over and run by groups of workers, just as in Argentina.
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif

Unread postby johnmarkos » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 13:00:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bart', '
')People will find a place in the informal economy, just as in 3rd World countries with high unemployment. People (especially women) will garden to make sure their families have healthy food and to earn some extra cash. Factories that have been closed may be taken over and run by groups of workers, just as in Argentina.


Also, as energy inputs decrease, a constant number of workers could use a declining quantity of energy. So you may not need to lay people off to lower the industrial energy footprint.

In an industrial realm, energy conservation means producing the same economic output while lowering energy consumption. That means that the factory does the same amount of work and produces the same value of goods while using less energy.

In a declining energy world, there are two paths that do not require fewer workers.

1. Productivity declines along with available energy. Declining energy corresponds to a constant number of workers.

2. Productivity does not decline but conservation lowers energy consumption. Again, declining energy corresponds to a constant number of workers.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California
Top

Unread postby frankthetank » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 13:22:36

Have the Nazis come up yet (or Hitler)??? J/K :-D

City of roughly 55K people and there are a little over 100 cops. Now realize that a lot of these cops are VERY lazy (and extremely fat) and therefore i wouldn't really think they would have much power in stopping mass crowds of people (we had a riot here once...i didn't turn out to good...) I also wonder how many would actually show up for work? not many.

Could the NG be sent in? Or are they all in Iraq still?

On paper Russia doesn't look that bad. Huge land mass (vast minerals), low populations, nukes up the wazoo, fighter planes. It might have collasped, but its still pretty much there, minus a few astan's
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Unread postby TWilliam » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 15:06:51

I think those Japanese have an excellent idea.

One of the greatest commentaries on this subject I've ever read:

Link

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')o one should ever work.

Work is the source of nearly all the misery in the world. Almost all the evil you'd care to name comes from working or from living in a world designed for work. In order to stop suffering, we have to stop working.

That doesn't mean we have to stop doing things. It does mean creating a new way of life based on play; in other words, a ludic revolution. By "play" I mean also festivity, creativity, conviviality, commensality, and maybe even art. There is more to play than child's play, as worthy as that is. I call for a collective adventure in generalized joy and freely interdependent exuberance. Play isn't passive. Doubtless we all need a lot more time for sheer sloth and slack than we ever enjoy now, regardless of income or occupation, but once recovered from employment-induced exhaustion nearly all of us [will] want [to] act. Oblomovism and Stakhanovism are two sides of same debased coin.

The ludic life is totally incompatible with existing reality. So much the worse for "reality," the gravity hole that sucks the vitality from the little in life that still distinguishes it from mere survival. Curiously—maybe not—all the old ideologies are conservative because they believe in work. Some of them, like Marxism and most brands of anarchism, believe in work all the more fiercely because they believe in so little else...

{Emphasis in original}
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 05 Apr 2005, 18:47:26

Oblomov, I got the novel and bookmarked it. This looks like it could prove enjoyable. The ludic economy: that's what we need, Specop. No need to trot out the old Marxist/Lenninist claptrap (unless its Groucho Marx and John Lennon we are to hail then I'm all for it)
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron