by Kingcoal » Sat 13 Jan 2007, 13:20:19
In the early days of the oil business, huge strikes would produce gushers and the flood of oil would destroy the market. As the business matured, producers figured out how to stop blowouts and cap wells and generally control the flow of oil to the market. As the market matured even further and moved out of the US, blatantly anti-competitive trusts emerged (OPEC) with the sole goal of pushing the price of oil as high as possible, even to the point of breaking the market (such as the early seventies oil shocks.) OPEC still has a problem with that. From a business standpoint, they are a collection of idiots reigning over vast wealth.
Most OPEC nations "milk" their oil business - they remove the profits and reinvest very, very little. Chavez comes to mind. US corporate tax policy strongly encourages reinvestment to avoid punitive taxes for profit taking and anti-trust laws prevent rigging of markets. Nationalized oil companies don’t have to worry about any of that as oil profits roll right into the Treasury. Anyway, recent events have a lot of people spooked. Indicators have been moving in strange ways. I think that speculators have had a free ride for most of the GWB administration. Every time the price should have come back to Earth, the US would do something to spook the markets. The problem with artificially propped up prices is that a reduction in demand can cause the prop to break. I think that is what's happening. A lot of very rich people have their assets affected by sudden dropping oil prices. They will take steps to try to restore the prop. Perhaps the recent troop "surge" is, in part, an attempt to prop prices back up.
"That's the problem with mercy, kid... It just ain't professional" - Fast Eddie, The Color of Money