by dolanbaker » Sun 11 Jan 2015, 07:10:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vtsnowedin', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dolanbaker', 'R')odents are the most likely successor due to their ability to quickly adapt to a changing environment and the fact that they can "breed like rabbits!". Their populations would explode due to the lack of predators and quickly overpopulate and crash.
Why would there be a lack of predators?
I would expect one of the African apes to eventually evolve into a human substitute over a million years or so. The opposing thumbs and current brain size and problem solving ability give them a head start over any other species.
In the meantime the plains of Africa would fill to capacity with everything from Elephant to Dikidiki and all the predators would have plenty to eat.
In the Americas buffalo and elk would compete with wild cattle and horses all kept in check by wolves, coyotes and mountain lions.
In many parts of the world, predators would have competed with humans and so have been almost eliminated. The rodent population explosion will be so rapid that no predator would be able to eat that much rodent. It is often said that there is one Rat per human but only about one fox per 1000 and foxes breed slower. Cats would do well but even they will be out stripped by the explosion in mice.
It would probably take a couple of decades for the predator/prey balance to be restored.
As for "future humans" you could be right.