Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

We'll go down fighting!

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby JPL » Fri 31 Aug 2007, 20:00:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'T')rying really really hard at something that doesn't work very well, at something that's doomed from the start - civilization - doesn't make it work any better.


Maybe let's try something different for a change, instead of the thing that's proven not to work.


We should take from the past all that is valuable to us and pass it onto our children. Let THEM decide which was right, and which was wrong. If we do not give them everything, then we also give them nothing.

JP
JPL
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1264
Joined: Sat 18 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Off with the Fey Folk

Re: new Edens

Unread postby TheTurtle » Fri 31 Aug 2007, 23:51:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CarnbY', '
')Were we doomed from the start, or didn't we try hard enough?


Or maybe we tried too hard. :(
“Humankind has not woven the web of life. We are but one thread within it. Whatever we do to the web, we do to ourselves.” (Ted Perry)
User avatar
TheTurtle
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1905
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Along the banks of the muddy Mississippi

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby thuja » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 02:01:46

Go down fighting- hee hee

Pre-pubescent fantasies by drooling apocolyptists who've been playing way too much Doom.

Die-off is a misnomer that few here seem to get. Substitute the words Population Contraction for Die-off and you'll get a better idea of what is going to happen.

Contraction is a process of decreased fertility and lowered average lifespans- due to- increased poverty, less medical care, alcoholism/drug addiction, poor nutrition, etc etc. Take a look at the ex-Soviet Union States and much of Eastern Europe to understand what Die-off looks like- its a lot less fantastic than most here on the board would like to think.

Yes pin-point die-offs are likely to happen as they are happening or have happened right now in the Congo, Sudan, Iraq, North Korea and Rwanda. But population levels are likely to decrease in amuch less dramatic fashion worldwide, and certainly in more fertile and temperate First World countries.

So go down fighting? Fighting what? You're friend who just got fired from Countrywide? Your neighbor who can't pay for his ARM? The kids who are stealing from your wood pile? or picking apples out of your trees?

There is no one to fight- only gnawing poverty and ignorance. Put away the guns and start working on solutions in your community...
User avatar
thuja
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2202
Joined: Sat 15 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Portland, Oregon

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 14:20:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JPL', 'W')e should take from the past all that is valuable to us and pass it onto our children. Let THEM decide which was right, and which was wrong. If we do not give them everything, then we also give them nothing.

JP



Why wouldn't we take from the past what is valuable and pass it on? But by deciding what is "valuable" we are making a value judgement (deciding which is right or wrong). So which is it? Pass on everything? Or pass on everything which is valuable? Or is it all valuable?


But I don't have children, so I don't need to worry about making such decisions.
Ludi
 

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ferretlover » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 15:44:04

HHHmmm... Shouldn't we make a decision about what the end goal is to be first?
Seems to me that would help to discern what was actually valuable to attain that goal, and what should be discarded, but filed away, so that those ideas/actions would, hopefully, not be repeated in the future.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 17:11:25

Do you mean the goal for Humanity, or, the goal for your community, or the goal for your family, or the goal for yourself?

At what level can we decide on an end goal?

And who is "we" in this context?
Ludi
 

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby BigTex » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 17:22:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', 'G')o down fighting- hee hee

Pre-pubescent fantasies by drooling apocolyptists who've been playing way too much Doom.

...

So go down fighting? Fighting what? You're friend who just got fired from Countrywide? Your neighbor who can't pay for his ARM? The kids who are stealing from your wood pile? or picking apples out of your trees?

There is no one to fight- only gnawing poverty and ignorance. Put away the guns and start working on solutions in your community...


I always assume the only real fight is against the urge to become hopeless. Sort of like the PO version of "we have nothing to fear but fear itself."

A hopeless mind often has trouble formulating creative solutions to problems it faces. I hope you see that however dire the PO situation turns out to be, each of us will fare better if we are able to think clearly and not go into a Chicken Little tirade of doom.
User avatar
BigTex
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3858
Joined: Thu 03 Aug 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Graceland

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 17:30:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BigTex', ' ')I hope you see that however dire the PO situation turns out to be, each of us will fare better if we are able to think clearly and not go into a Chicken Little tirade of doom.


Hear hear!


:)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ferretlover » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 17:56:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', ' ') Why wouldn't we take from the past what is valuable and pass it on? But by deciding what is "valuable" we are making a value judgement (deciding which is right or wrong). So which is it? Pass on everything? Or pass on everything which is valuable? Or is it all valuable?


I have underlined the 'we' in this context.

"Do you mean the goal for Humanity, or, the goal for your community, or the goal for your family, or the goal for yourself?"

One or more of the above goals.
One can hardly assume what would be valuable or what should be trashed if one doesn't have a goal/desired result in mind.
IHMO, you either have a goal, then work to achieve it, or, you just accept all and try to change all that is encompassed in your immediate and/or extended environment, "willy-nilly" with no goal in mind.
The second possibility seems rather unproductive and wasteful to me, in the sense of energy (of any type) that will be required to augment changes at any level or of any type.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 18:00:46

I agree goals are important. I have personal goals, but I don't have goals for Humanity. That would be ludicrous.

Who do you, Ferretlover, mean by "we"? That's what I'm asking.
Ludi
 

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 18:13:55

Do you think people can decide on an end goal for Humanity? If so, who would decide and how would the decision process occur? Or does each individual formulate a goal for Humanity?
Ludi
 

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ferretlover » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 18:36:15

Nobody can solve a problem if they don't know what the problem is and what makes it a problem. I think it is possible to accidently solve a problem, but if the someone who does so doesn't know there was a problem in the first place, and, doesn't share their knowledge with any others, of what value is that?

Everyone who can think has personal goals at sometime in their lives. Unfortunately, there are a Great many people who do not or cannot reach those goals for many reasons: they do not have the knowledge to reach their goals, they are too lazy to attempt to reach those goals on their own, etc.

And, it is ludicrous to assume that people who think don't have goals for humanity. It would be interesting to find out what those goals are--perhaps a survey done in a local mall, or on the streets or your city, etc. "What would your goal for humanity be?" I am fairly certain that every single person could think of something! (Even beauty pageant contestants, "I'd like world peace...")
Because a person has, essentially no power over the thoughts and actions of the rest of the world does not mean they cannot have thoughts/wishes for the reality that they would like to see develop for humanity.

"Who do you, Ferretlover, mean by "we"? That's what I'm asking."

In the terms of this discussion, *I* meant 'we' as the members who were discussing this topic. Brainstorming towards possible goals for a group/population of any size is a good mental, problem-solving exercise.

And, you said:
"Trying really really hard at something that doesn't work very well, at something that's doomed from the start - civilization - doesn't make it work any better. Maybe let's try something different for a change, instead of the thing that's proven not to work"

If you feel that civilization was doomed from the start, why do you plan to work with your neighbors?
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 18:44:21

When I use the word "civilization" I use it in the anthropological sense.


Civilization isn't sustainable, but human society, human culture, can be.


For more thoughts along these lines, I recommend the books of Daniel Quinn, especially "The Story of B."



I think it would be ludicrous for me to devise a goal for humanity. It might not be ludicrous for you to do so. It's just not the way I tend to think about my role on the planet, I'm not that capable of making decisions, especially for others.
Ludi
 

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 18:52:51

Try not to "read into" what I say so much, Ferretlover. We'd communicate better, if you don't understand what I'm saying, if you would ask me to clarify instead of assuming I'm saying something I'm not.


Thanks. :)
Ludi
 

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ferretlover » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 18:56:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'D')o you think people can decide on an end goal for Humanity? If so, who would decide and how would the decision process occur? Or does each individual formulate a goal for Humanity?


Do I personally think that people can decide on an end goal for Humanity. Yes.
Do I personally think that all humans will come to the same idea?
No.
Do I favor discussing possibilities for possible end goals? Yes.
IHMO, working with words to solve problems beats the heck out of just killing off dissenters.
"Who would decide?" Why, the people who would be affected by the decisions that were developed and accepted.. If their decisions worked in a way that others saw as desirable, then the others would be free to adapt those goals and expand on them as they saw fit.
Humans aren't going to change radically, They will continue to use the same methods of developing villages, towns, cities, governments as they have always done until a different procedure is accepted by them or forced upon them.
Not knowing the desired goal, I could not guess about how it would be implemented. I imagine that there could be many ways to reach an end goal. For instance, when I belonged to a quilter's guild, we all made quilts. We did not all use the same methods, but the end result was the same-a finished quilt.

"Or does each individual formulate a goal for Humanity?"
Why not? Formulating an idea does not require that it must be accepted by all. It does infer that the individual is interested in the future outcome for Humanity, and is making an effort to develop Humanity in some way. It does not mean that the idea is a good one. There is a Great deal of difference between thinking and doing.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 19:02:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ferretlover', ' ')They will continue to use the same methods of developing villages, towns, cities, governments as they have always done until a different procedure is accepted by them or forced upon them.


But humans haven't "always" formed cities and governments; this kind of society is the minority among human cultures, probably only about 10,000 years old or so. That's what I mean by "civilization." We can devise different ways to live, because people have done so in the past.


That's a goal quite a lot of people have, actually, to find a different way to live.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ferretlover » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 19:09:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'T')ry not to "read into" what I say so much, Ferretlover. We'd communicate better, if you don't understand what I'm saying, if you would ask me to clarify instead of assuming I'm saying something I'm not.Thanks. :)


I do try not to read into what someone writes. I make an effort to respond covering/interpeting what I read. Responding can be done in so many ways, but since I can not hear the tone of your voice, or read your body language, I try to respond in several ways to give the reader, hopefully, a better idea of "where I am coming from."

I assume nothing intentionally. I respond based on my personal life experiences. If I find that my response is negative, I try to figure out why and work around it, trying not to be negative back (unless I can't get around the fact that someone is trying to "pull my chain." My kids Still call me the Dragon Lady at times! lol)
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 19:14:38

ok, thanks. I hope you don't mind if I try to clarify what I'm saying if I think you might have misunderstood. For instance, when I say "I" or "me" I mean my own self and not anyone else, and when I say "you" I almost always mean "you the person I'm addressing" and not "me" or "someone." And generally if I ask a question I'm actually asking a question, and not debating. :)
Ludi
 

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ferretlover » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 19:15:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')hen I use the word "civilization" I use it in the anthropological sense.
Civilization isn't sustainable, but human society, human culture, can be.
For more thoughts along these lines, I recommend the books of Daniel Quinn, especially "The Story of B."
I think it would be ludicrous for me to devise a goal for humanity. It might not be ludicrous for you to do so. It's just not the way I tend to think about my role on the planet, I'm not that capable of making decisions, especially for others.


I have ordered the Quinn book (Monte suggested it).
Please be more specific: define what type of civilization you are referring to, please.
I can not immediately see why it would be ludicrous for you, or anyone else, to devise a goal for humanity. Makes me think of people who think that just because something is written, it must be so (or, it is "carved in stone").
Just because an idea is not put into action, does not make it less valid. And, maybe, someday in the future that idea would be a perfect fit--if it was remembered.
Ferretlover
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 5852
Joined: Wed 13 Jun 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Hundreds of miles further inland
Top

Re: We'll go down fighting!

Unread postby Ludi » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 19:32:47

Thanks Shanny, I forgot to check at Anthropik for a good overview.
Ludi
 

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron