by Ferretlover » Sat 01 Sep 2007, 18:56:35
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'D')o you think people can decide on an end goal for Humanity? If so, who would decide and how would the decision process occur? Or does each individual formulate a goal for Humanity?
Do I personally think that people can decide on an end goal for Humanity. Yes.
Do I personally think that all humans will come to the same idea?
No.
Do I favor discussing possibilities for possible end goals? Yes.
IHMO, working with words to solve problems beats the heck out of just killing off dissenters.
"Who would decide?" Why, the people who would be affected by the decisions that were developed and accepted.. If their decisions worked in a way that others saw as desirable, then the others would be free to adapt those goals and expand on them as they saw fit.
Humans aren't going to change radically, They will continue to use the same methods of developing villages, towns, cities, governments as they have always done until a different procedure is accepted by them or forced upon them.
Not knowing the desired goal, I could not guess about how it would be implemented. I imagine that there could be many ways to reach an end goal. For instance, when I belonged to a quilter's guild, we all made quilts. We did not all use the same methods, but the end result was the same-a finished quilt.
"Or does each individual formulate a goal for Humanity?"
Why not? Formulating an idea does not require that it must be accepted by all. It does infer that the individual is interested in the future outcome for Humanity, and is making an effort to develop Humanity in some way. It does not mean that the idea is a good one. There is a Great deal of difference between thinking and doing.