by Keith_McClary » Thu 26 Aug 2004, 03:40:51
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Repent', 'M')y initial article was serious. Although some of the objections listed as replies are real challenges, we don't need to talk science-fiction about space resource possibilities.
We don't need "warp drive" or other nonsense ideas to cloud real possibilities. There is no air resistance in space once an object is in motion it stays in motion no matter how far the journey. You get space tankers to Jupiter the same way we get satellites to Jupiter. You have a minimal amount of thrust & use planetary fly-by assists to accelerate / decelerate further.
A space tanker around Jupiter could extract the methane while in low orbit through a retractable pipe of sufficient length to reach down into the abundant deposits & pump them up.
Even if your tankers weighed nothing, you would still have to lift the methane cargo out of Jupiter's gravity and propell it towards some other planet to take advantage of the fly-by assist. And then you would have to decelerate it to deliver it to the Earth's surface.
Your idea to dump the methane into the atmosphere and then
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')extract the methane from the Earth's atmosphere at our leisure
is impractical - there are already vast amounts of methane in the atmosphere thanks to swamps, volcanos and bovine burps. It is only 2 parts per million but the mass of the atmosphere is 5x10^15 tonnes.
That works out to 10 billion tonnes of methane in the atmosphere.
This is of no use as a fuel since it would require a large amount of energy to extract methane in such small concentrations from the air.