by TheAntiDoomer » Thu 23 Jul 2009, 13:18:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e told the TED Global conference in Oxford that a synthetic human brain would be of particular use finding treatments for mental illnesses.
This fooker is nutz.
....said the guy loading his basement with Ak-47's.....

"The human ability to innovate out of a jam is profound.That’s why Darwin will always be right, and Malthus will always be wrong.” -K.R. Sridhar
Do I make you Corny?

"expect 8$ gas on 08/08/08" - Prognosticator
by vision-master » Thu 23 Jul 2009, 14:12:59
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TheAntiDoomer', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')e told the TED Global conference in Oxford that a synthetic human brain would be of particular use finding treatments for mental illnesses.
This fooker is nutz.
....said the guy loading his basement with Ak-47's.....

Don't own one. Just a sks.

by Carlhole » Thu 23 Jul 2009, 14:14:24
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Hoops_Mckann', 'W')ould these brains be utilized in the 2019 model fembots by chance?
No "chance" involved. It's virtually guaranteed.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('
Carlhole', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cipi604', 'E')xperiments are not 'a reality soon', they are just experiments ...Peak-oil comes a lot faster than QC, that's for sure... actually PO is here.
PO may be here or near, but a true Singularitarian would reply, "Any such energy crisis, or even die-off, will only speed our trajectory towards a "singularity".
The groupthink around here has always dictated that our industrial society cannot/will not adapt and that there is nothing left to discover, and that scientific exploration, advanced R&D is a terrible waste of resources.
But you don't have to stultify your mind with groupthink. The fact is: no one can divine the future. And those past social/political/ideological movements which have made rigid prognostications about the future have been wrong virtually every time. It's always been amusing for people to read what folks of yore thought would occur in the near future.
Oops, I forgot..."THIS time is different!", you say.
Let me tell you something, Life on Planet Earth will morph successfully into whatever it figures will allow it to grow. Humanity's huge technological accomplishments and huge hump of population and infrastructure will yield unto something entirely new eventually. Trying to guess at what that new thing will ultimately be is a fool's errand.
But since I'm a fool when it comes to the future, I predict that population will decline -- it could be slow, it could be a sudden drop due to deliberately engineered bugs or whatnot -- but increasing machine intelligence, planetary grid intelligence and aspects of transhumanism are trends that will not diminish under even war-like conditions of society. Even without any resource crisis, billions of ordinary people are going to be totally redundant.
During crises, people tend to band together tightly. They live more socialistically. And they create grand visions based on what is truly worth achieving. In such a zeitgeist, it becomes the dream of every individual to contribute whatever he/she possibly can to the broad society. This is the kind of adaptation that energy shortages, resource costs and overpopulation would begin to create.
The knee-jerk assumption that you need a monstrous consumer society in order to engage in science or technical development is nonsense in an age of machine intelligence - where intellectual horsepower may be concentrated for specific purposes. To suggest that a rapid plummet to subsistence levels without any broad societal adaptation is just a fantasy.
The tone of this board is so stultifyingly Luddite - as if it wants everyone else to remain dead ignorant of some of the other major trends occurring alongside population growth, resource depletion/cost increases, geopolitical strife, etc.
However, there is an ongoing explosion of scientific exploration into completely new areas - namely quantum mechanics and applications. How can you completely ignore stupendous efforts like CERN or hugely interesting projects like Blue Brain? It's like the mindset actively resents anyone's interest in areas outside the doomer notions of Peak Oil Orthodoxy.
GE has been talking about developing a Smart Grid and politicians have talked about the importance of competing with the Chinese on the development of renewable energies. And so it is worthwhile for anyone with an interest in energy to read about the possibilities inherent in other areas of science.
Rather hear about numerology or something?