Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Crude oil prices: Energy Bubble?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Crude oil prices: Energy Bubble?

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 18:25:05

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/02/ ... JRG0.shtml
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')rude oil futures _ which surged earlier this week as the dollar tumbled _ fell slightly after the GDP report. A barrel of light crude closed at $51.49, up 10 cents, on the New York Mercantile Exchange.

Oil stocks rallied, resuming their place at the forefront of the market. Exxon Mobil Corp. was up $2.13 at $63.26, while ChevronTexaco Corp. added 78 cents to $61.94 and ConocoPhilips climbed $2.14 to $112.32. All three stocks reached all-time intraday highs in Friday's trading.

"You've seen energy stocks taking off while technology stocks have been lagging since mid-December," said Ken Tower, chief market strategist for Schwab's CyberTrader. "I think if energy stocks are going to lead the market, then tech stocks won't be. Energy stocks represent higher consumer prices, and that will cause technology stocks to suffer."


http://www.thestreet.com/_googlen/comme ... 668_2.html
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')xxonMobil (XOM:NYSE - news - research) was a big winner Friday after an upgrade by Prudential Securities and amid talk of a "bubble" in energy stocks. For the week, the Amex Oil & Gas Index rose 4.4%, while the Philadelphia Stock Exchange Oil Service Index gained 2.6% as crude prices hit a four-month closing high of $51.49 Friday, up 6.5% for the week. (Elsewhere this week, the euro rose 1.3% vs. the dollar, gold rose 2.2% and the 10-year's yield was essentially unchanged at 4.27%.)
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Unread postby maverickdoc » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 18:27:02

what are you trying to say BP?
User avatar
maverickdoc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby mgibbons19 » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 18:44:53

So according to the cheerleaders, there is an energy bubble, but there is no housing bubble?

Anyone taking bets?
mgibbons19
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 18:53:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('maverickdoc', 'w')hat are you trying to say BP?

Is there an "energy bubble" in store for the stock market?
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Unread postby maverickdoc » Fri 25 Feb 2005, 18:59:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BabyPeanut', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('maverickdoc', 'w')hat are you trying to say BP?

Is there an "energy bubble" in store for the stock market?


I think you know the answer to that :-D

But seriously have you notice oil companies with huge windfalls investing that money into non-energy related items while not investing on refineries or exploration? I think they are trying to say something
User avatar
maverickdoc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 722
Joined: Wed 12 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby ernest » Sun 27 Feb 2005, 02:19:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('maverickdoc', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BabyPeanut', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('maverickdoc', 'w')hat are you trying to say BP?

Is there an "energy bubble" in store for the stock market?


I think you know the answer to that :-D

But seriously have you notice oil companies with huge windfalls investing that money into non-energy related items while not investing on refineries or exploration? I think they are trying to say something


Nobody is investing in refineries because they are SO EXPENSIVE and there are so many government agencies and so much regulation that even if you get halfway through the seven year approval process, one lawsuit by a citizen can disrupt everything. And the environmental demands are so onerous that the companies simply don't want to risk money on a sure loser.

And companies are spending money on R&D. Shell, Apache, BHP, Exxon, they are all spending huge sums on more costly drilling and exploration. Don't kid yourself, the higher oil prices go, the more money will be spent. The only reason more is not spent is that they don't want to get caught in situation where they buy $40 oil and the market goes to $30. They are catching on that this is increasingly unlikely.
User avatar
ernest
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat 18 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Crude oil prices: The Oil Bubble

Unread postby JohnDenver » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 09:20:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A') growing number of people in the energy industry, including the chairman of Exxon Mobil, are voicing concern over whether soaring oil prices are justified by conditions in the market.

Some are even comparing the trading in energy markets to the speculative frenzy in technology stocks in the late 1990s.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here are some indications that prices may be due for a decline. China's crude oil imports fell 12.7 percent from a year earlier in the first two months of this year, to 18.17 million tons, the country's General Administration of Customs said last week.

In the United States, concern about a supply shortage is easing. The Energy Department said on Wednesday that oil inventories rose by 3.2 million barrels in the previous week, to 302.6 million barrels, the highest level since July. The nation's oil supplies are almost 10 percent higher than a year ago.

"The numbers speak for themselves, but it's up to the market to interpret them," said Vincent Delisle, a strategist at Scotia Capital in Montreal. "Any time anyone says we're in a new era of oil prices, I feel the need to remind them that oil is a commodity and commodity prices are cyclical. We're in a mania environment for anything related to oil that lacks fundamental reasoning."


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t may take a while for supplies to catch up. The Saudis are expected to quadruple drilling, to 60 rigs, but that is not expected to lead to marked production increases for about three years, said David Pursell, a principal at Pickering Energy Partners, an energy investment firm in Houston.

http://www.iht.com/articles/2005/03/15/ ... s/oil.html
JohnDenver
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2145
Joined: Sun 29 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby smiley » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 09:54:52

I'm personally inclined to say that the prices are indeed too high. I certainly wouldn't go long at the moment. Certainly not on the April or May contract.

But on the other hand everyone is saying that. Everywhere you hear the same story: "Stocks are good, production is good, these prices are not justified". I had a discussion with some traders yesterday, and without exception they were short at the moment.

So if there is a bubble, who is sitting on the long side? The last OPEC oil market report showed that the long position is small. In fact it has been much larger in previous months. This seems to confirm the statements of Nymex, that speculation is not driving the markets at the moment.

Without an excessive long position, there can not be a bubble. What we see now are the real market fundamentals.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Unread postby 0mar » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 13:43:27

Light crude is becoming more valuable. We have a glut of intermediate and heavy crudes, but that light stuff is rare. As it should be, it is the first crude pumped out of a field. Light crude is mainly responsible for gasoline.
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Unread postby ernest » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 15:00:50

Yes, the only three refiners that refine heavy crude in the US have not built a new refinery in decades. They also have more than doubled in price in the last year. Valero has double in six months. Premcor has double in the last six months, and Tesoro has doubled in the last year.

That's it. All that Saudi sour crude has to go through one of these companies refineries to become gasoline, etc.
User avatar
ernest
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat 18 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby cube » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 16:12:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('0mar', 'L')ight crude is becoming more valuable. We have a glut of intermediate and heavy crudes, but that light stuff is rare. As it should be, it is the first crude pumped out of a field. Light crude is mainly responsible for gasoline.
That's the way the world works. First you eat the good food and then you hesitantly eat the bad food last when the good stuff no longer exists. However if sour crude looks bad today at least it's more desireable then oil sands. In the future more refineries will need to retooled to handle sour crude because there won't be enough sweet crude for everybody who wants it.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Unread postby qwanta » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 16:15:59

One thing to look at is the p/e (price/earnings) ratio of oil companies:

BP 17.3
ChevronTexaco 9.5
Exxon 15.6
Shell 13.1
Unocal 14.4
(finance.yahoo.com)

15-20 is a p/e historical average that is often cited. By this measure at least they wouldn't seem overpriced.

In comparison the NASDAQ p/e hit 246 in Feb.2000 and is now still around 30.
(usatoday.com)
Last edited by qwanta on Wed 16 Mar 2005, 16:28:37, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
qwanta
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue 08 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Unread postby BlisteredWhippet » Wed 16 Mar 2005, 16:16:26

8)

Everything looks normal from here...

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/ ... tml#stocks
User avatar
BlisteredWhippet
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 848
Joined: Tue 08 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Oil prices: just a bubble

Unread postby dukey » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 17:24:37

personaly i disagree but a lot of people in the 'investment' community think this is so. some blame the media for pushing the prices higher by getting people 'scared' Link
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: just a bubble

Unread postby Z » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 17:36:34

Strange. I thought that a precondition for a bubble is that everyone agree that the price can only go higher ( like in a certain housing bubble that shall remain anonymous ).
User avatar
Z
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed 11 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: France

Re: just a bubble

Unread postby turmoil » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 17:41:28

oil prices are cyclical so they are partially right... Where prices will go long-term, however, has nothing to do with traders. It's geology stupid. :)
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Re: just a bubble

Unread postby newdamage » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 17:44:40

Usually a bubble means that for a relatively short period of time there's a perceived scarcity of something and people rush to get as much as possible.

With the current housing bubble it is based around location, not about a lack of open land to build on. There's nothing stopping all the people on the coasts from coming here to the midwest and building a house (please! don't! we like the midwest just fine without the crazy Californians and New Englanders).

But with any oil bubble, well, even if it does come down it doesn't change the fact that this bubble is about a very real scarcity, not some perceived scarcity.
User avatar
newdamage
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed 25 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: just a bubble

Unread postby Eli » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 17:55:06

I agree it is all bubble,

the whole of the twentieth century has beenone big bubble. The whole cheep and easy energy that gave birth to our modern economic system is one gigantic bubble.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: just a bubble

Unread postby Free » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 18:50:32

Sometimes I really wonder what would happen on this board if Lynch et altera where right and ppb would plummet to $30 and stay there for the next couple of years...
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: just a bubble

Unread postby advancedatheist » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 19:04:49

When the housing bubble does collapse, all the houses will still exist, apart from the slow attrition to the supply caused by fires, natural disasters and demolitions.

If the price of oil collapses, however, that doesn't change the underlying reality of depletion and the fact that the world's population still consumes a billion barrels of the stuff every 11-12 days, which sets the stage for another price singularity down the line. The two bubbles have dissimilar causes and long-term outcomes, in other words.
"There was a time before reason and science when my ancestors believed in all manner of nonsense." Narim on <I>Stargate SG-1</i>.
User avatar
advancedatheist
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron