Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual transport

How to save energy through both societal and individual actions.

Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual transport

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 30 Jul 2019, 03:13:46

I've built one off of a KMX frame with added front suspension. It currently has no motor and is entirely pedal-powered. Here's videos of me doing 30-40 mph down a street in the local hood:

https://vimeo.com/284616898
https://vimeo.com/284616919

It would be much faster if I got the aerodynamics right, but on this first build, I did get the ergonomics correct for my needs the first try. It's very comfortable to ride and easy to use, with plenty of storage space. It can also be brought through a doorway into an apartment.

From downhill testing, I was able to derive a CdA figure of 0.25 m^2, but commercial models exist that have less than 1/5th that amount of aerodynamic drag. With the first body I made for it shown in the above videos, it required approximately 500W of power to hold 30 mph on flat ground. I've reached more than 50 mph downhill in it and it has proven stable while making a lane change at that speed over imperfect roads, and the mechanical braking system has proven adequate.

I’ve put more than 500 miles a month on it since building it. I no longer use a car for transportation(I might again one day when I can finally get the electric Triumph GT6 finished).

Specs as shown in the above videos were as follows:

-KMX framekit with added coroplast body; unladen weight of about 65 lbs with a CdA of 0.25 m^2
-Exa gas shocks set up for 60 psi for front suspension
-Ackerman steering
-Velocity USA 20" double-walled rims up front with 13ga spokes with 26" rear wheel with 12ga spokes
-Schwalbe Marathon Greenguard 20x1.5" e-bike tires up front rated for 50 km/h continuous use with a Schwalbe Marathon Plus Tour 26x1.5" tire in the rear
-Shimano Tourney 165mm crankset with 28/38/48T gearing and a DNP Epoch 32-11T 7-speed freewheel
-KMC "gold" 7/8-speed chain

Of course, I plan to put an electric motor to it when financing permits.

I took the body off last year to make repairs to the drivetrain and have the next body shell designed, and am waiting on a friend to get his truck legal so I can pick up the plastic sheet I need to finish the 2nd design iteration of the shell. The goal is a CdA of 0.12 m^2, which would allow me to do 30 mph on only 250W of power, and possibly reach close to 50 mph on flat ground when pedaling hard for short periods.

Adding a motor to it, with enough power, could make it capable of performing like a car.

The long term goal is to build a vehicle with the following traits:

-Less than 100 lbs total unladen vehicle weight. This figure includes having installed the motor, battery, and rest of electric drive system with the vehicle ready to ride. Just add rider, tools, luggage, ect. to get laden weight.

-CdA of under 0.12 m^2, but the lower the better(current guesstimate for the new shell I'm building may be around 0.10 m^2, but really don't know. It will have wheel farings to cover the outboard front wheels and streamlined boots over the suspension arms).

-Conventional bicycle parts for the human power drivetrain; derailleurs, chain, sprockets, ect.(Currently planning a 26/39/52T chainring set up front with 152mm crankarms, an 11-34T 8 speed cassette in the rear, and will be adding a Schlumpf high speed drive sometime after the financing permits me to convert it to electric). The bicycle drivetrain will be sealed from outside the velomobile. This will allow it to last tens of thousands of miles, and the gearing would be appropriate for anything from slogging up a 20% gradient with the motor disabled at 3.5 mph with 60 cadence, to careening down the highway at 55 mph with 140 cadence with the motor on or downhill at that speed with the motor off, and cruising along on flat ground at 30 mph with a leisurely 90 cadence without even needing to be in top gear. With a Schlumpf high speed drive added in combination with an electric motor, it becomes theoretically capable of cruising along at freeway speeds, like a car, and exceeding any U.S. speed limit, with human power adding useful motive force at any operating point.

-Torque sensing PAS to multiply pedal output. The assist doesn't add power unless the user is pedaling. For emergencies, in case of failure of the bicycle drivetrain, a throttle could be added with the Cycle Analyst computer limiting throttle-only mode to 20 mph to keep it legal in areas where this is necessary

-Electric drive system capable of no less than 6 kW peak and 1 kW continuous(Currently planning to use a Leafbike hub motor which can handle 4 kW peak and 1500W continuous out the box and can be modified for 6 kW peak with ease)

-1.5+ kWh pack of Tesla Model 3 batteries with aftermarket BMS

-Light duty DOT-compliant moped rims laced on all hubs, with Schwalbe Energizer solar race car tires all around. Must be safe at highway speeds, have a low enough rolling resistance to be pedaled like a normal velomobile with the drive system disabled, and as light as possible to minimize the acceleration penalty over normal bicycle wheels/tires from inertia

-Hydraulic disc brakes on all wheels set up with a single pull lever

-Full suspension, keeping the gas shocks at the front and adding a gas shock to the rear

-The rider must be enclosed for all weather riding. NACA ducts aimed at neck and armpits for cooling, with more air drawn in from footholes.

-Roll cage. It only needs to be strong enough to match the weight of the laden vehicle in a wreck to protect the rider.

-Ability to carry tools, camping gear, a few changes of clothes, hygiene items, 2 gallons of water, and a 2-3 days worth of food, all at once, with room to spare OR carry tools, 1 gallon of water, and 2 weeks worth of groceries

-Small 12V auxiliary battery fed from traction pack via DC-DC converter running headlights, running lights, brake lights, turn signals, and gauges(speedometer, cadence meter, heart rate monitor, power meter for rider, power meter for motor, battery pack state of charge, motor temperature, Cycle Analyst)

Theoretically, if all of the above were done, with the motor activated, it should be good for 0-30 mph acceleration in around 3 seconds and 0-60 mph acceleration in under 10 seconds pedaling as hard as I can with the hubmotor doing the rest, a top speed of more than 100 mph with the Schlumpf drive engaged while human power still accounts for 10% or more of the motive force needed to hold 100 mph(even if not for long), maximum "safe" cruising speed around 45 mph(it is a short wheelbase tadpole after all, but full suspension will make a big difference for stability. With just the front suspension I have now, it is stable downhill at 50 mph for short durations and I'd trust it all day long at 35 mph over bad roads) where human power still accounts for roughly 30% of what is needed to maintain speed, perhaps 200 miles range at 35 mph with rider input of 150W and 120 miles range at 45 mph with a rider input of 200W, and with the motor deactivated, it would still be able to move like a velomobile, perhaps with the rider able to do flat ground speeds of 20 mph on 100W, 30 mph on 250W, 35 mph with 350W, and brief sprints of up to 45 mph with 650W.

Perhaps if I can fit it within the allotted weight budget, solar panels could even be added to greatly extend the range. A 100W solar panel system would go a very long way to extending its usable range, especially when combined with the pedal input.

It would be legally an "electric bicycle" in a few U.S. states and "undefined"/"unregulated" in many others, while also highly illegal in many jurisdictions as well. For the states where it would be illegal, turn the motor off and ride it like a normal velomobile. For states where it's legal, have fun on state highways and side roads, just stay off the interstates.

The energy efficiency equivalent when operating the motor would be in the thousands of miles per gallon range. If it only needs 250W to do 30 mph and 1,600W to do 60 mph, with 33 kWh in a gallon of gasoline, this is the equivalent to 4,000 miles per gallon at 30 mph and more than 1,200 MPGe at 60 mph. Far better is possible, if I had wind tunnel access and knew enough about aerodynamics to get there. By comparison, a Milan SL velomobile needs 130W to do 30 mph and 750W to do 60 mph, which could yield close to 7,500 MPGe at 30 mph and more than 2,500 MPGe at 60 mph with a high efficiency drive system.

It would be a great off-grid bug-out vehicle. If I end up homeless, I may end up living out of it. I'd be able to cover quite a bit of distance in it as well, almost as quickly as a car, but without any of the expense.

In the long run, as better motor technology enters the market, I could make this thing much faster. There exist prototype PMDC motors that weigh in at only 7 lbs that can make 30 kW peak. Such a monster would allow this vehicle 0-60 mph in under 4 seconds, IF it can get enough traction to achieve that...
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby Newfie » Tue 30 Jul 2019, 08:38:38

Yup, you need a job. Turn that creative energy into cash!

There a bunch of folks who are hot on building electric powered sailboats. IF you ever get bored with land transport.

Neat stuff you are building.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 30 Jul 2019, 14:12:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'T')urn that creative energy into cash!


That's something I've been wanting to do since I was in high school.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here a bunch of folks who are hot on building electric powered sailboats. IF you ever get bored with land transport.


I'd do that job. There's a lot of overlap in design principles between the two.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')eat stuff you are building.


I'll be able to finish it when I get the money. There are solutions to the coming energy crisis all around us that entail minimal or no reduction in living standard. But they would also mean rich assholes no longer get access to our money.

We could have had mass market electric cars going mainstream in the 1990s with 150+ miles range at an affordable cost, but powerful interests held it back. It wasn't until Tesla got a foothold in the market 20 years later that things started to change. History is riddled with technological advances that have been deliberately kept out of the mainstream consciousness as being viable or that were already implemented and deliberately destroyed(such as the U.S. widespread mass transit system of the early 20th century) because they threatened some powerful interests' revenue stream and control, all under the guise of convenience or "market forces".

Future generations are going to curse us for having allowed the world's plenty to be squandered for the purpose of profiting an elite few.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sun 07 Feb 2021, 01:43:13

An update.

Pics of the bike:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

So far here's the realized specs:

-46 mph top speed on flat ground on a full charge with the motor enabled
-1,500W peak power, plus rider effort
-7 watt hours per mile @ 30 mph w/light pedaling
-9 watt hours per mile @ 35 mph w/light pedaling
-12 watt hours per mile @ 40 mph w/moderate pedaling
-12 watt hours per mile in the snow with enough effort to do 30 mph on flat ground, but riding at speeds from 20 to 40 mph with a 20 mph rolling average
-While powered yields a consistent 40-50 mile range with enough effort to cruise at 30-35 mph on flat ground in freezing weather. I get about 8.5AH from the 46.8V pack in the cold, although it is rated to 10.5AH. This should improve to perhaps 60 miles range at the same speed in warmer weather due to reduced air density and increased battery capacity.
-With the motor disabled, I can pedal it to 35 mph in a sprint and cruise on flat ground around 23 mph. I lost a few mph unpowered after installing the motor due to its additional weight and cogging losses.

I tend to cruise around 30-35 mph and my lifetime average energy consumption is about 9 wh/mile.

At any operating speed with which it is capable, it feels stable and tracks straight. It has been up to 60 mph downhill before I motorized it and felt stable. It is very controllable at 30-40 mph in 30+ mph crosswinds with 50 mph gusts, although one will need a bit of effort to keep it straight in those extreme conditions. The brakes are good up to about 35 mph, but after that they are questionable and require careful modulation.

Regarding what specs this will eventually have, I'm in the process of building another battery pack. It's going to be 72V 21AH, capable of delivering 5 kW peak, and is liable to give me a 150-200 mile range @ 30-35 mph, acceleration like a car(simulation shows 0-30 mph in about 5 seconds with a 96A phase current, but a better controller and a 150A phase current could allow 4 seconds), and a 70 mph top speed. I’m also going to finish a set of wheel fairings, a windshield, roof, and rear wheel cowling to cut drag further. I also plan to add brake lights, permanent running lights, headlight, and turn signals, as well as solar panels and a charge port for electronics. Later upgrades may also include hydraulic disc brakes, thicker brake rotors, and perhaps a rear suspension.

Here's some additional specs:

-Weight: 82 lbs
-CdA: Unknown
-Trike Frame: KMX framekit
-Body shell: Custom corrugated plastic bodywork with aluminum ribbing, mounts, and supports
-Battery: 46.8V 10.5AH pack of 13S3P Panasonic NCR18650GA cells, 490 Wh rated capacity, 1,500W rated peak power
-Motor: Leafbike 1500W 4T wind brushless PMDC motor, w/10k NTC thermistor and 10-12 awg bullet terminals, laced to 26" rear wheel w/13ga spokes and double-walled aluminum rim
-Controller: Phaserunner v3, currently set to 1,500W maximum power output, 750W maximum regenerative braking
-Computer: Cycle Analyst v3 DP, currently set to 1,500W maximum power output
-Charger: GrinTech Cycle Satiator HV model
-Torque sensor: Sempu 2-wire w/115mm spindle width, no throttle installed at the time
-Front wheels: Velocity 20" 32-spoke w/13ga spokes laced to double-walled aluminum rims
-Front tires: Schwalbe Marathon Greenguard 20x1.5" @ 95 psi
-Rear tire: Schwalbe Marathon Plus Tour 26x1.5" @ 60 psi
-Front crankset: Suntour XCT Jr. with 152mm crankarms, modified with 26/39/53T chainrings
-Rear gearing: SunRace 34-11T 7 speed cassette
-Front derailleur: Microshift Mezzo
-Rear derailleur: Shimano Tourney RD-TX35 7/8sp
-Chain: KMC Z7, lubricated with Boeshield
-Torquearms: custom KMX torquearm designed and made by EndlessSphere member dhwahl(left-side), GRIN Torquearm Kit v4(right-side)
-Right shifter: Shimano Revoshift 7 speed index grip shift
-Left shifter: SRAM 3-speed index grip shift
-Front suspension: EXA gas shocks on upper/lower swingarms at 65 psi, suspension designed and made by EndlessSphere member adam333
-Brakes: Avid BB7 calipers with 165mm disc rotors, cable-pull operated
-Right Brake lever: Terratrike dual-pull lever with parking brake
-Left Brake lever: GrinTech ebrake, operated for regenerative braking in the rear
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby Plantagenet » Mon 08 Feb 2021, 19:04:41

Wired magazine had a story about German velomobiles several years ago...a company named Leiba manufactures them there....

saddle-up-yer-velomobile-in-Germany

Image
German Leiba velomobiles

Apparently you can buy one of these for about $5000-$6000 in Germany, so if you decide to sell yours, toecutter, thats the going market price for velomobiles.

Cheers!
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to f#@% things up---Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------
Keep running between the raindrops.
User avatar
Plantagenet
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 26765
Joined: Mon 09 Apr 2007, 03:00:00
Location: Alaska (its much bigger than Texas).

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sat 20 Feb 2021, 01:02:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Plantagenet', '
')
Apparently you can buy one of these for about $5000-$6000 in Germany, so if you decide to sell yours, toecutter, thats the going market price for velomobiles.

Cheers!


That article is out of date. Today's cost is almost double that. And those don't even come with electric motors at that cost; they're entirely pedal powered.

Mine isn't refined enough to sell. That will probably take 2-3 more design iterations. Mine could be replicated for about $2,500-3,000 in off the shelf parts/materials, including paying for the labor/manufacturing/profit margin that it took businesses to build the frame/suspension/bicycle drivetrain/batteries/motor/controller, but not counting my own labor. If everything were OEM and in mass production volume, it is conceivable that a vehicle like mine but with even greater reliability and some degree of crashworthiness vs a car could be built and sold at a small profit for around $2,000. A completely pedal powered vehicle could be even cheaper.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sun 05 Sep 2021, 10:02:23

I bought a Milan SL, mainly to reverse engineer aspects of its design, most especially its aerodynamics. It can do 30 mph on 140W, and I can pedal it to just under 50 mph on flat ground in a sprint and hold 30-35 mph all day long on flat ground, completely unmotorized. My goal is for the next iteration of my custom build to have twice the drag area of the Milan, which while while it will not be as slippery and efficient as the Milan, it will come with the advantages of a few inches more ground clearance, more suspension travel, shorter turning radius, faster cornering without tipping over, more storage space, and accessibility of all the mechanical parts making it easier to service. If I get a CdA twice that of the Milan and the solar car tires I install end up with a Crr of 0.008, I'm looking at roughly 225W needed to hold 30 mph, BUT in a vehicle rugged enough to handle crap roads, and on good roads, able to cruise at 70 mph and reach 100+ mph with the electric motor running.

Here's some pics of the two trikes:

Image
Image
Image

Image
Image
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby phaster » Sun 10 Apr 2022, 22:51:50

about a year and a half ago took delivery of an Arcimoto FUV which is a three wheel electric motorcycle because I found it wasn't possible to carry stuff (like from the grocery store) basically since then I have not used my electric beach cruiser,...

anyway since I'm a fan of odd efficient modes of transportation my plan is to buy a two seat three wheel tilting eBike when the design is perfected

http://electrek.co/2022/02/25/arcimoto-unveils-radical-three-wheel-drive-electric-leaning-trike-that-it-thinks-can-beat-e-bikes/

might be possible to add an "aero" body???
truth is,...

www.ThereIsNoPlanet-B.org
User avatar
phaster
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 513
Joined: Sun 15 Jul 2007, 03:00:00

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 19 Apr 2022, 23:15:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('phaster', '
')
might be possible to add an "aero" body???


The dimensions, steering geometry, and suspension of that particular conveyance won't make it easy to design a body for it. Tilting delta layouts are a lot easier to design a shell for than a tilting tadpole layout(a tilting tadpole is what this Arcimoto is). You're going to need a tall, rounded design, and it will have to have clearances to accommodate this vehicle's tilting characteristics. Because of the chosen position of the wheels at zero tilt relative to where the extremities of the shell would be, it would also be vulnerable to crosswinds, especially thanks to its tall ride-height, and its potential to reduce drag will be hampered.

Take a look at the non-tilting Arcus velomobile and tilting Jetrike for design ideas that will fit around both you and the chassis. Because the search engines these days censor results, finding info on the Jetrike will be next to impossible, so I included a picture of it:

Image

I could design you one, but due to the Arcimoto's layout and dimensions, it probably won't be all that efficient relative to what I could produce with a non-tilting layout or a tilting delta layout, but it would definitely be an improvement over the naked trike, and offer rain/sun protection. Further, I haven't had the time to complete my own design anyhow with my job working me so much.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby theluckycountry » Fri 22 Apr 2022, 15:39:35

A lovely hobby, I'm a cyclist myself, but by the time the roads are clear of truck traffic so it's safe to ride them, they will be in such disrepair you won't be able to anyway. I only ride road, smooth road, but I envisage the day when I will have to use a full suspension MTB on those same roads, Already I have had to buy an adventure motorcycle, with the long suspension and knobbly tires, for long rides up country. The roads are just too bad to take my sports bike. And after the recent floods it's taking the government bodies inordinately long to repair all the potholes too. They are running out of money, oil is money.

Nice one that Jetrike toecutter. I wonder if there would be a way to partially counter the crosswind effect? something like vertical stabilizers that can tack like a sailboat does? All computer controlled of course. Pointing straight ahead or laying against the body and adjusting angle or popping up when the wind loading becomes extreme. Just a thought...
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sun 26 Jan 2025, 01:47:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', 'I') only ride road, smooth road, but I envisage the day when I will have to use a full suspension MTB on those same roads


I built an electric full suspension mountainbike as a backup vehicle for when I'm working on the velos and when they are out of commission:

Image

It uses about 4x the energy per mile @ 30 mph as my custom built velo.

My custom velo is being upgraded to AWD with 25+ kW peak power, and the intent of accelerating from 0-60 mph in under 4 seconds and topping 120 mph. It is a simple EV built to be easily repaired with basic hand tools, and a car could be built just like it. If electric cars like this were built, they'd last forever and be easily/quickly repaired with hand tools by an illiterate drunken mechanic incapable of basic algebra, unlike the $50,000+ tech-bloated abominations we have available today which are designed to end up in landfills.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby theluckycountry » Sun 26 Jan 2025, 05:39:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', 'I') only ride road, smooth road, but I envisage the day when I will have to use a full suspension MTB on those same roads


I built an electric full suspension mountainbike as a backup vehicle for when I'm working on the velos and when they are out of commission


You've got a rear hub motor in that eh? I have several push bikes, all basically hardtail MTB converted to road use and gravel flatbar bikes but also one old Giant NRS with a bafang 750W conversion, center drive, I like to drive through the chain, gives me more options as far as hills go but I wouldn't mind a RWD hub motor providing it had a good linear throttle control. The bafang thumb lever is pretty much full power all the time unless you are very gentle and hold it near the rest position. Probably a software thing but I don't have the password to make mods.

Web pix

Image

Image

Image
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sun 26 Jan 2025, 13:16:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', 'Y')ou've got a rear hub motor in that eh?


That was the first motor I had in my electric velomobile, when I was running 3kW peak power. It's a Leafbike 1500W with a 4T wind. When I decided to upgrade to a Leafbike 1500W 3T to run 10kW and 250 Nm torque in the rear wheel of the velomobile, I needed a use for the motor. I intended to put it into my Milan SL velomobile, but it wouldn't fit in the rear wheel housing, so I bought a full-suspension mountainbike for $400 on craigslist and put this motor in that, making it into a backup bike. All the EV parts currently in the mountainbike were parts that originally were used in my first iteration of the custom velomobile.

The mountainbike is typically run at 750W, but has seen 3kW(it does wheelies at 3kW), and likes to cruise at 25-30 mph. I have torque-sensing PAS, and at full pedaling effort, I can reach 39 mph on flat ground. Range is about 40 miles at 30 mph cruising speeds with a 1.5 kWh battery. That same battery/motor/controller gave me 150-200 miles range in the velomobile at 30 mph.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') like to drive through the chain,


This requires a more expensive chain of about $200 to avoid having excess wear. A normal $20 bicycle chain in these conditions will require replacement every 500-1,000 miles. In contrast, by my chain having nothing but pedal power going through it, I get 15,000+ miles out of three $20 chains in my velomobile. I doubt a $20 chain will last as long on my mounainbike because unlike in the velo, it is exposed to the elements, whereas I sealed it off in he velo.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'b')ut I wouldn't mind a RWD hub motor providing it had a good linear throttle control. The bafang thumb lever is pretty much full power all the time unless you are very gentle and hold it near the rest position. Probably a software thing but I don't have the password to make mods.


Your problem is that you're using a proprietary system where the user is locked out of software access/modification. THIS is the same shit that is ruining electric cars, taking a technology that could easily last a human lifetime, and turning it into landfill fodder.

I use a Cycle Analyst computer, a cheap Chineseum $15 half-twist throttle, and a Fischer-AG torque-sensing bottom bracket in all of my vehicles. I have full control over the programming and have set the throttle and torque-sensing PAS up exactly the way I want it. If anything breaks, no problem, as I can take my basic Harbor Freight tools and swap in any off the shelf parts I want and reprogram the Cycle Analyst to make the part do what I want.

The electric cars you can buy would be so much better if you could do this! But they're deliberately built with planned obsolescence in mind, locked out of repair by proprietary software and tools, because the auto industry doesn't want to build cars that last forever. They want to keep selling more cars. There is no shortage of ebike manufacturers that do the same skuzzy bullshit as the auto industry.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby theluckycountry » Tue 28 Jan 2025, 02:47:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '
')That was the first motor I had in my electric velomobile, when I was running 3kW peak power. It's a Leafbike 1500W

I'd never heard of them, I went with the bafang HDD equipped bike because it's been around for ages and has a good rap over on the endless-sphere forum.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The mountainbike is typically run at 750W, but has seen 3kW(it does wheelies at 3kW), and likes to cruise at 25-30 mph. Range is about 40 miles at 30 mph cruising speeds with a 1.5 kWh battery. That same battery/motor/controller gave me 150-200 miles range in the velomobile at 30 mph.

That's an appreciable difference and I assume it's all down to aerodynamics. It's one reason I like to cruse at lower speeds, say around normal pushbike (racer) speeds, 25km/h. Not that I'm all that good at it, especially on the return trip with the scent of a coffee in my nose... Hmmmm, Coffee. Excuse me for a minute!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')ChainDrive: This requires a more expensive chain of about $200 to avoid having excess wear. A normal $20 bicycle chain in these conditions will require replacement every 500-1,000 miles. In contrast, by my chain having nothing but pedal power going through it, I get 15,000+ miles out of three $20 chains in my velomobile.

I've often thought they must have a beefier change, but surely that better chain must be larger overall and require a different chain ring & sprockets? over on the dedicated forums they all carry a spare chain, just in case, and say they wear out fast. I run a 9-speed chain on the e-bike with quick link and carry a spare. To avoid stressing the drivetrain I always gear down "A lot" on hills. Basically I drop the power level (bafang has 5) to a 2 or 3 and shift up to a large rear sprocket. I replaced the rear cluster a little while ago and got one with a Really Large low gear sprocket. I already have the smaller Leckie Bling ring so my flat road top end isn't too flash, around 43/km/h if I want to be on the 750W level. But I don't care if I have to crawl up the hills, I just don't want to trash my drivetrain. I also up the power up progressively as I run along the flats and usually limit it to level 4.

Naturally all this is done on a minor dual carriageway/highway devoid of traffic early in the morning. As I said earlier I'm just dipping my toe in -still- after owning the bike for 3 years. It's a novelty and I didn't want to ride it too much because I like the exercise I get on the non-e-bikes and I have the motorcycles for daytime running around. One day it might be an important means of transport and I wanted to have some experience with them. So many of the e-bikes are those proprietary hub-motor builds or central motor/gearbox arrangements. I'm not interested in them because the bikes are typically garbage and a Gearbox 8O No Way! Far too noisy and lossy if you have to pedal. The Bafang purrs like a kitten and the way I ride it never gets really warm and never Hot.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he electric cars ... are deliberately built with planned obsolescence in mind, locked out of repair by proprietary software and tools, because the auto industry doesn't want to build cars that last forever.
All modern cars are a nightmare now. I have a small 2010 japanese 4x4 and I wouldn't want anything more modern. I would never consider an EV, they are a Joke, a gimmick car with their 1 ton battery packs and limited range at that. A typical end of the oil-age kneejerk reaction where the company makes all the money and the consumer is left with an albatross they have to make stories up about. "We went to the lake camping and had a great time in the new Rivian truck. Great acceleration and we went the whole way out and back on only 70% charge." Yeah, and the Lake was like 50 miles up the road. Imagine trying to evacuate from a Hurricane in one of those and get a roadside charge a couple of hundred miles up the road :lol: You might as well take the bus.

I had my own skeptical theory about the EV, I though for a while, while sales were booming and governments were 100% behind them, that it was a ploy to get the lower classes off the roads by eventually mandating that if it wasn't an EV it wouldn't be allowed. No way the average worker would be able to afford one new and the secondhand ones are junkers. I don't think that now the tide has turned and the EV is heading out the back door.
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 28 Jan 2025, 14:42:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', 'I') would never consider an EV, they are a Joke, a gimmick car with their 1 ton battery packs and limited range at that. A typical end of the oil-age kneejerk reaction where the company makes all the money and the consumer is left with an albatross they have to make stories up about.


It wasn't until the auto industry figured out how to lock DIY mechanics and indie mechanics out of repairs that they finally allowed EVs to enter the market.

The EV technology to comfortably transport a family of five with 200+ miles highway range at an affordable cost has been viable for nearly 30 years now. The problem is this: EVs have no oil changes, no tuneups, no pistons, no belts, no pulleys, no seals, no gaskets, don't need transmissions, and if built correctly have minimal shit to fail. A LiFePO4 or NiMH battery pack can be made to last 3 decades and over a million miles with minimal electronics. Modern LiTO are even better regarding longevity.

On the whole, if the goal is cheap transportation that saves resources, EVs are far superior to ICE as a technology.

The problem is this:

-the auto industry won't give up planned obsolescence. Instead of building simple, mostly-analogue EVs with minimal bells and whistles at low cost, that can be repaired with hand tools, they build tech-bloated abominations laden with proprietary software inaccessible without expensive dealer-only tools, vehicles designed to end up in a landfill when the touchscreen breaks or the battery fails. An electric car's drive system and electronics should be no more complicated than a basic ebike build or a 1980s golf cart, otherwise you're doing it wrong.

-on the subject of planned obsolescence, the auto industry won't give us aerodynamic designs. On the highway is where range matters most, and to get acceptable range, you don't need a 2-ton battery pack. Build a comfortable, low-slung, roomy sedan with a drag coefficient of under 0.18, gut all the bells and whistles and keep it basic, use physical buttons and knobs for all functions, keep the software open source, design it to be repaired with tools you can get at your local hardware store, make the battery pack easily accessible for repair/replacement, and you now have a 200+ mile range EV that can weigh a few hundred pounds less than its ICE-powered equivalent, because you'll only need a 30 kWh battery, it could be priced around $20,000 made with 1st world labor, and the damned thing would last a human lifetime. But the profits in such a thing would be narrow thin, and that's why we get bloated 4-ton SUVs/trucks/CUVs with 2-ton battery packs instead, deliberately designed to end up in a landfill after a decade.

-trucks/SUVs/CUVs are entirely the wrong application for the technology. Their aerodynamics suck, necessitating a larger battery, making them heavier, which makes them less efficient. This is a nasty feedback loop that drives costs upward, because the battery is the single most expensive thing in the vehicle and the largest component of is operating cost

-the auto industry suppressed EVs in the 1990s because they threatened to shrink multiple revenue streams. The cars were simple and repairable back then, and EVs would have extracted less money from consumers if designed correctly. Now that the industry has figured out how to misuse the tech and bloat up operating costs and increase the number of failure points well beyond an ICE car, and pad in wider margins, and assure the cars can't be repaired in old age, they're now all for it.

The problem is that rich people control what the consumer has available to buy. Rich people don't want money in the hands of people who aren't rich, as that allows the non-rich to get themselves into a position to compete for resources. The rich seek to extract every cent they can in order to stay rich, using government if they must. Cars are one of their favorite ways of doing so in the USA and why we have no alternatives here. THIS is why modern EVs suck. And as car operators, we're being robbed of real technological progress, reduced costs, and increased vehicle lifespan.

Electric cars, properly built, allow for the possibility that a college kid could buy a cheap new car, put 1+ million miles on it in their lifetime making small repairs at the local mechanic and maybe 2-3 battery pack replacements along the way, and then pass it down to their grandchildren in usable shape to where on a whim they could confidently take a trip from LA o NYC without much fear of a breakdown. There's no massive windfall of profit in that for the auto industry, but it would be great for the environment and from a resource use standpoint.

My velomobile has 80,000 miles on it now. Total cost of ownership, including total build cost, upgrades, repairs, maintenance items, and charging, has been about $4,500. No one is making money off of my ass. Per mile, it's cheaper than mass transit, with most of the convenience of a car. Considering the cost of food and shoes, it's cheaper than WALKING. Rich people fucking HATE the idea that. There's no money in it for them, because people get to keep their money. An electric car built on the same set of principles such as simplicity, reparability, minimal aero drag, wouldn't cost a whole lot more per mile, mostly the 10x or more increase in electricity consumption, additional build material costs, and the added burden insurance/registration/taxes, ect. vs the velo.

For basic A to B transportation of people, there is nothing in existence right now from a resource or energy consumption standpoint that is superior to EV technology. The fact that modern electric cars are even worse by this metric than ICE cars from the 90s was a deliberate industry choice made, in attempt to maintain a paradigm of infinite growth on a planet of dwindling natural resources, and future generations are going to curse the captains of industry for depriving them of a reasonable standard of living in the name of short-term profit.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby theluckycountry » Tue 28 Jan 2025, 16:39:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', 'T')he fact that modern electric cars are even worse by this metric than ICE cars from the 90s was a deliberate industry choice made, in attempt to maintain a paradigm of infinite growth on a planet of dwindling natural resources

Yes, totally, and it's not just cars, it's Houses and appliances, everything the consumer buys. But that's the world and I don't regard myself as an A-typical consumer. Let them do as they please, I don't have to buy their products.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'b')loated abominations laden with proprietary software inaccessible without expensive dealer-only tools, vehicles designed to end up in a landfill when the touchscreen breaks or the battery fails.

My BMW motorcycle -pre 2020- has a small lcd display and a large analog tachometer. Every year a message "Service Due" pops up and replaces the engine temperature readout. I can spend $900 on the electronic tool to clear this, or take it to a BMW dealer for $80, but I just ignore it, bikes rarely overheat. When I take it in for new tires, every 2 years or so, I bitch and they clear it for free lol. I do all my own maintenance generally. We have choices, still, and while we do I stock up on older tech.

But leaving aside the machinations of the elite, can you elaborate on that $200 chain? is it a different size? Requires different sprockets and derailleur?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')A LiFePO4 or NiMH battery pack can be made to last 3 decades and over a million miles with minimal electronics. Modern LiTO are even better regarding longevity.

How is this possible? I keep mine at 40% charge when not in use, LiPO and LiFeO4
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Wed 29 Jan 2025, 03:56:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('theluckycountry', '
')Yes, totally, and it's not just cars, it's Houses and appliances, everything the consumer buys. But that's the world and I don't regard myself as an A-typical consumer. Let them do as they please, I don't have to buy their products.


The problem is that a large percentage of the population is not only ignorant of the political dynamics at play regarding what they can buy, but they also have no genuine choice either, other than to do without altogether.

I have appliances from the 1950s myself. They will possibly outlast me. They are also very inefficient regarding energy consumption and when time permits, I plan to design and build my own to address that. They won't be "energy star compliant", but they will likely be far more efficient than anything government approved.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e have choices, still, and while we do I stock up on older tech.


Your choices are dictated by your money available. Which is rapidly inflating to worthlessness globally. Most Americans don' have any money, and therefore no choices. "Rent-to-Own" stores and predatory PayDay loan places are a thing here.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut leaving aside the machinations of the elite, can you elaborate on that $200 chain? is it a different size? Requires different sprockets and derailleur?


Same sprockets and derailleur, but the chain is made out of a more durable alloy. You still have to keep it cleaned and oiled to avoid premature wear and tear, which would mean a wipe down after every ride if it's exposed to the elements as is the case on nearly all upright bikes(Dutch bikes that put their chain in a constant oil bath, as well as recumbent velomobiles that protect the chain from the elements with covers, are the exception).

$200 would have been for my application, as I require 3 since it's a long wheelbase recumbent trike, but since I don't use a middrive I use a normal bike chain. Price has come down a bit since I last contemplated a Cyclone Middrive, so maybe $135 now, plus shipping. In your application, about $45 if you were to hypothetically live in the USA:

https://carsoncitybikeshop.com/chain-kmc-x9e-9s-sl-136l-f-ebike/

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow is this possible? I keep mine at 40% charge when not in use, LiPO and LiFeO4


Large format LiFePO4 batteries arranged in a single string do not develop appreciable voltage imbalances over time. This means you can do without a BMS. The 208V 100AH pack in my Triumph GT6 electric car conversion has no BMS. The pack is dumb with no electronics or regulators. All the electronics are in the charger. 12 years after being built and with somewhere under 1,000 miles of illegal operation, all batteries still read within 0.001V of each other. They were bottom balanced upon installation in 2013, and that is it. They have remained balanced. Jack Rickard of evtv.me also did this with his conversions, and after tens of thousands of miles in each car, the batteries remained within 0.01V of each other after 5+ years of use, no BMS.

This works ONLY in a single series string layout of LiFePO4 or LiTO batteries that have been initially bottom-balanced to within 0.001V of each other and with correctly installed fasteners and interconnects with consistent levels of resistance. If you parallel multiple strings of batteries, you absolutely need a BMS. This trick is for practical purposes only applicable to lead acid, NiMH, NiFe, NiCd, LiFePO4 and LiTO chemistries. This allows you to keep your electric car conversion's drive system more simple than the ICE system in a 1950s carbuerated clunker.

All other LiIon batteries, no matter the configuration, ABSOLUTELY needs a BMS and it is unavoidable.

LiTO and LiFePO4 batteries have an unknown shelf life. It's in decades. The CALB LiFePO4 I use can last upwards of 3,000 cycles to 100% discharge, and that is their worst case scenario for an individual cell. My car should in theory get about 150-200 miles range on a full charge, but I haven't gotten the chance to test that yet as the car is not legal, or theoretically upwards of 450,000-600,000 miles if I deep discharge the cells all the time, which is the worst thing you can do for their longevity. However, if I were to drive 20-30 miles per day, I'd possibly get 50,000+ partial discharge cycles, or over a million miles, if limited shelf life doesn't kill them first

LiTO have 10x the cycle life of LiFePO4.

LiIon with cobalt cathode degrade and will last 5-20 years shelf life, and 500 cycles to full discharge. These are the batteries commonly used in the 2000s/2010s EVs, and even then, 6-figure mileage on a battery pack was common. The NiMH batteries of the 1990s were much more robust than the LiIon of the 2000s, packs in GM S10 EVs and Toyota RAV4 EVs still alive and kicking. There are 10+ year old Tesla Model S's with over 500,000 mils on their original LiIon battery packs as well, kept alive with all of the electronic bloat, the same bloat that could just as easily brick them if they sit too long.

The excessive electronics and software are shortening the maximum potential longevity of modern EV LiIon packs. These packs absolutely need regulation(thermal, voltage, fusing, ect) because they are complicated monstrousities of small standardized individually-fused cells built into massive parallel blocks, but it's the feature creep providing constant electronic drain and lack of easy access for repairs that is killing them prematurely. You can't easily fix them(although Sandy Munro is devising ways/processes to do so).

I said fuck all that, and built my pack to be simple and dumb, like an ICE car from the 1950s. I have to pay attention to it and check the voltage of all cells periodically(once a month), as there's nothing monitoring it for me, which is why I chose LiFePO4 for the car. I do not excd the cell's power capabilities, to avoid causing damage. They have a heating element for winter use(never used, as it hasn't been driven or charged in winter yet). If something goes wrong and a cell goes into thermal runaway while charging while I'm not there to see it, instead of burning the car and garage down, it will belch out toxic smoke and leave a melted battery instead. LiIon instead will erupt into a spectacular fire, hence it always needs BMS, while I can get away without BMS for a single series string of LiFePO4.

The idea behind battery pack longevity is to keep it as analogue as you safely can, and make it easily accessible to replace bad cells if they occur.

The same applies to my velomobiles and ebike, except unlike my car, they use a BMS because they have LiIon chemistry instead of LiFePO4. I only need one BMS and one fuse, controlling the entire pack for these vehicles. The BMS I chose for these vehicles is user programmable using open-source software compatible with virtually any laptop computer, in my case a 20 year old windows XP machine(but it was made to work with newer computers, and also worked with my linux laptop). No proprietary software lockouts to keep me from tinkering with it! Reduced failure points has meant great reliability. My $200 1.5kWh Greenway pack that I first used in my velomobile is now in my mountainbike, still yielding more than 90% of original capacity. I bought this pack used and it is now approaching a decade old. The velomobile has since gotten a 20S6P pack of Molicel P42A that I put togther, also with a BMS, because I wanted more power for random acts of hooning, racing, street takeover use, and general jackassery. It has enough power to run 3 motors once I complete my upgrade to AWD, and I plan to start at 25 kW/500 Nm torque, maybe go as high as 50 kW, in a vehicle that will weigh under 120 lbs.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby Tanada » Wed 29 Jan 2025, 17:51:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '
')The problem is that a large percentage of the population is not only ignorant of the political dynamics at play regarding what they can buy, but they also have no genuine choice either, other than to do without altogether.


Speaking of forced choices, do you know of anybody producing and selling aluminum wire wound generators, alternators and motors? The techniques to make them as safe as copper have been around for decades and they are between 50 and 60 percent of the weight of copper wound equipment of the same capacity. For a brief moment there was a plan to introduce them to sub compact ICE vehicles for the weight savings by replacing all the copper in the electrical systems but some lobbyist for copper mining got that killed as a "safety measure". Heck in most states in the USA it is against code to use aluminum branch wiring because of a few high profile cases of bad installations back in the 1960's, as if technology and knowledge has not advanced since then. Meanwhile nearly all exterior wiring is now aluminum and the heavy appliance wiring for electric appliances like stoves, driers and water heaters is also aluminum depending on local code.

It drives me a bit higher on my blood pressure to see people nattering on about copper shortages limiting the electric grid when 90 percent of wiring today in the USA is aluminum right up to the breaker box in the house, then it switches to copper branch wiring due to code requirements as if it were a magic metal. When I was a kid we raised a small herd of beef cattle and the electric fence was steel wire. The truth is we could wire a regular house with braided steel wiring by using a larger diameter cable if we wanted to avoid both copper and aluminum. Electricity is not magic and metal wiring follows very simple rules of resistance and capacity. Make the wire big enough to handle the current it will be carrying and you can make it from nearly any metal you want. History is my thing so I know that right up to the 1940's most US navy ships were designed with single wire systems with the steel structure of the ship acting as the return feed for the generator circuit. DC circuits naturally enough.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Alfred Tennyson', 'W')e are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Tanada
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 17094
Joined: Thu 28 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: South West shore Lake Erie, OH, USA
Top

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby theluckycountry » Thu 30 Jan 2025, 04:04:23

Perhaps losses are a factor in some cases. Certainly Aluminium has greater resistance, ergo higher losses. There is also corrosion to be factored in. I sold a 1980's era motorcycle back a couple of years ago, a Kawasaki GPZ 900R. It had sat abandoned in a garage for 30 years, covered from rain but an inch of water crossed the floor every time the rain was heavy enough. Every aluminium alloy surface was white power, quite deep too was this corrosion. These were factory painted surfaces too, Wheels, frame, brake fluid reservoirs. Only anodized aluminium seems to withstand this sort of corrosion I have noticed.

When they want very low losses they use Silver wire. Solar panels, space tech, missiles etc.
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia

Re: Velomobiles: The most efficient form of individual trans

Unread postby theluckycountry » Fri 31 Jan 2025, 19:52:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', '
')I have appliances from the 1950s myself. They will possibly outlast me. They are also very inefficient regarding energy consumption and when time permits, I plan to design and build my own to address that. They won't be "energy star compliant", but they will likely be far more efficient than anything government approved.

I have often found that more energy efficiency often results in less power, certainly true of modern fans! Electrical energy efficiency was always a dead-end since as soon as they made fridges more efficient they made them bigger, as soon as inverter tech went into airconditioners every one installed them. I have a lot of solar and even though it's only 27-C outside I have AC running now @ 9:30am. Why not, it's free and it's nicer to type at 23-C

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow is this possible? I keep mine at 40% charge when not in use, LiPO and LiFeO4

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'L')arge format LiFePO4 batteries arranged in a single string do not develop appreciable voltage imbalances over time. This means you can do without a BMS. The 208V 100AH pack in my Triumph GT6 electric car conversion has no BMS. The pack is dumb with no electronics or regulators...

LiTO and LiFePO4 batteries have an unknown shelf life. It's in decade
LiTO have 10x the cycle life of LiFePO4.
LiIon with cobalt cathode degrade and will last 5-20 years shelf life,
The idea behind battery pack longevity is to keep it as analogue as you safely can, and make it easily accessible to replace bad cells if they occur.


Balancing, I didn't realize it was that important, though I do balance my 4C R/C batteries with an appropriate charger, they are 7 years old, stored at 40% and still good. I have an offgrid system with four 225Ah Trojan 6V cells, configured into two 12V arrangements. I made sure the cables between each and between the inverter/regulator were all identical in length though as I understand the principle of balancing.

As for those exotic chemistries, I have never dabbled into them. I know though that as you go more sophisticated the price goes up as well. To someone whose mobility is bases primarily on Gasoline I tend not to look to deep.
We're 17 years past the peak now and the 3rd World is going hungry and dark. We'll be next, we're well on the way in fact.
theluckycountry
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 5254
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2021, 18:08:48
Location: Australia
Top


Return to Conservation & Efficiency

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests