Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Trader's Corner 2006

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Where will the price of WTIC oil be on December 29, 2006?

Less than $50
3
No votes
Around $55
4
No votes
Around $60
7
No votes
Around $65
15
No votes
Around $70
58
No votes
More than $80
101
No votes
 
Total votes : 188

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby cube » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 13:05:26

Once again I have my finger stuck into a bushel of corn. I just dropped it 2 days ago but I got back in again yesterday.

I said 2 weeks ago corn will move up. I was wrong. It has actually been going sideways. Looks like my fortune teller was giving me bad advice. :wink: However since the trend was sideways nothing was gained or loss. It was a wash.

I'll say it again. Corn will move up. Either my stop order gets filled or I make a half decent gain. Am I going to be wrong 2 times in a row? Only time will tell...
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby drew » Wed 09 Aug 2006, 17:57:37

Oh, what to do?? I hate this- ah em... I love this ;-), I meant. But you get it folks-do you take the sure profit? Or wait for more greedy piggy! Oink oink..... I can take a cool grand on my Nexen tomorrow morning-but should I?

Mr Bill posts about big draw downs -stay in?

Cougar talks of tshf soon (US econ I assume)-sell?

All these dilemmas....

I love this -I think?

Drew

P.S. My avatar almost killed Dave Letterman....
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Chaparral » Thu 10 Aug 2006, 00:58:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('cube', 'O')nce again I have my finger stuck into a bushel of corn. I just dropped it 2 days ago but I got back in again yesterday.


I closed out 25% of my shorts at 2530 and hedged another 20% by going long Dec 07.

The stock to usage ratio this year will be in the single digits and that is pretty darn low. We will need PERFECT weather next year to avoid a severe shorfall in '07-'08. To the extent that Ethanol demand being legislated, that demand is also inelastic; good for us bulls.

There is some educated opinion that even if we have a yield of 150.8 bu/acre this year, the supply still will fail to meet demand. The basis price at the gulf has remained strong and everytime corn dips to the high 230s low 240s, the stuff flys out the elevators. Some are saying that we could see a critical low in the Dec 06 contract of 2460 or even higher. I am real floopity-doopin close to just flat out reversing direction and going 100% core long when (if) it hits 2520 next. The thing that is keeping me in the short game at the low/mid 2500s is that harvest pressure will severely impact the basis price and that may make shorting profitable and also provide a nifty opportunity to load up longs on CZ-07.

On yesterday's carnage in Kansas City, I went seriously long on KW-Z06. I am still short Chicago white but I may just close out entirely and reverse direction at 4020-4040 for Dec '06.

IF the carnage we have seen this week in both corn and wheat is over with and the lowest lows have been made, then we will have three instances of the lowest lows trending higher. Check the charts back to May-June and you'll see it.

I ain't touching soybeans. Life is complicated enough as it is.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Thu 10 Aug 2006, 03:52:42

Crude is falling out of bed this morning, despite those draws yesterday. It looks like it just got overbought and now it is correcting? I was short, closed my short yesterday after that big draw in gasoline inventory, it went down overnight, and now it is lower again. And I made nothing! ; - ((

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou posted some fine information covering a lot of ground, but the matter of refinery utilization and capacity deserves more attention. And, no, your argument regarding refinery capacity holds no water. In order for refinery capacity to be an issue at the national level, even resulting from another major hurricane, the utilization rate would have to drop down into the 75%-86% range at the national level as it did for six weeks last year. This would mean that a number of refineries would have to go offline concurrently. Moreover, the availability of imported finished motor gasoline products would have to go flat, and that isn't the case at this time. Europe has plenty of spare motor gasoline production capability, as an example, and we still import finished motor oil depending on available pricing and excess product elsewhere. We also export finished motor gasoline.

Absent a major disaster, there is no shortage of refinery capacity in the U.S. based on available and utilized capacity considerations. None at the national level, not at the PADD level, and very few exceptions if any over the long term below the PADD level relative to regional and national demand requirements. We're still exporting finished gasoline product from the Gulf Coast PADD, for example. There is no refinery capacity shortage because the refineries have repeatedly improved their efficiencies significantly to add additional capacity.


Maybe it is just me? What you say makes sense. There is no supply shortage, but refining capacity still remains ‘the bottleneck for increased production’, if and when existing capacity is taken out of production due to refinery fires, blocked canals, hurricanes of other disruptions.

Perhaps my comments should be in the context of last summer as the long rally in the crude occurred against a backdrop of rising inventories. What was the market worried about? They were looking over the horizon for the next disruptive event and it came in the shape of Katerina/Rita.

This summer the event may be a closing of the Straits of Hormuz, but as Guest posted, the speculators own 2.3 barrels of oil in the form of futures contracts versus actual supply (I hope I got that right off the top of my head). That means they can carry those contracts to maturity and take delivery of the futures. No wonder the price is high. Who can deliver 2.3 times more product than exists?

In any case the whole complex is distorted by using a grade of crude, WTI which is light, sweet and low in sulfur, which is declining in availability, and being replaced by cash grades that are heavier, more sour and more expensive to refine, and therefore cannot be delivered against the WTI futures contract. Ditto for the MTBE unleaded contract. GSCI will phase-out its exposure to the HU contract during the SEP/OCT rollover, and thereafter only have exposure to the ethanol RBOB futures contracts. That will be a 72.222 contract drop in demand for unleaded from AUG. I guess that MTBE unleaded will then have to be re-exported? It will not be available for consumption in the USA.

Getting back to Old Vet's original question, why are prices so high when there is ample supply, is mostly because the integrated commercials can comfortably sell crude forward at the cost of full carry, knowing they have ample supplies to meet refining demand. And the refiners have also not aggressively had to hedge their forward production either due to the uncertainty surrounding the phase-out of MTBE for ethanol grade, the upgrades to low sulfur diesel, AND the outside possibility that storms in the Gulf later this year might affect refining capacity in the main coastal areas like last year. As gasoline stocks are now below 3-year averages, one or two major storms would further reduce that supply cushion, even as geo-political supply concerns from the ME, Iran in particular with the Straits of Hormuz, and disruptions of light Bonny sweet from Nigeria have still not been resolved.

So there is no shortage, but no one is willing to aggressively short the market, which given the length of the ETF/commodity hedge funds mean the risks are still skewed to the topside and supported by specs buying on the dips as well. The path of least resistance is sideways or up despite adequate supply.

Never the less according to CERA/JPMorgan and others there is more refining capacity and supply of crude expected to come online in 2007 through 2010, and if the US, and therefore the global economy, slow in 2007, that may well tip the supply/demand balance towards lower crude and refined product prices.

Unless those same geo-political concerns continue to dominate sentiment. I have been waiting all summer for the market to tire of problems in Iran and Nigeria and focus again on fundamentals, but they haven't, and just when we test the lower ends of the ranges, more violence kicks off in the ME. And we still do not know what the hurricane season will bring? Bah, what a way to make a living? Always looking for storm clouds over the horizon. If it was just about ample supplies to meet demand we could take $20 risk premium out of this market immediately. But as the blow-up at MotherRock amply demonstrates, being short can be hazardous to your financial health.

In other words, just because a train is on the wrong track, doesn't mean you want to stand in front of it! ; - )

p.s. think that the oilmen are investing, it is just they would prefer to invest free cash flow as opposed to going out on a limb to fund $3-5 billion projects with debt that may not come online until well after this spike in prices is by. Seems to be more JVs between OPEC and non-OPEC producers for refineries closer to end markets, like Saudi and Kuwaiti investment in Chindia and Russia’s Lukoil’s planned expansion in Turkey. Whereas in the USA upgrades versus new refineries seems to be easier from a regulatory/public policy/NIMBY point of view.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby cube » Thu 10 Aug 2006, 12:47:24

Looks like there are no shortage of opinions here. You know how the old saying goes right?

"Opinions are like a rear end, everyone has one." :P

Honestly I don't have much to say...at least not for today and probably not for the rest of this week. In the meantime I'll just sit tight. See you guys next week.

WOW! my 1000th post. 8)
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby truecougarblue » Thu 10 Aug 2006, 15:01:46

I shorted CDE this morning at 5.37 and now have a stop in for 0.10 gain. I'd obviously like to see this correction run a bit so as to feel more confident when I go long again.

I think the terrorist thing messed with the market some today. I guess the expectation of reduced demand for jet fuel got to the oil market, and the oil market got back around to the broader market. Maybe we'll see further weakness closer to the close.

It certainly is complex when you realize how interconnected things are. I think as we go forward the next couple of weeks we'll see some downward pressure on the equities. I sort of feel that the market is putting on a brave front in the face of what seems to be conclusive evidence of a significant economic downturn. I personally believe the US is in the first quarter of recession as we speak.

My big question remains, will this recession cool things off enough to kill the long term PM bull or will we see further weakness in the dollar that will feed the PM fire?
User avatar
truecougarblue
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 612
Joined: Wed 21 Dec 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby mrobert » Thu 10 Aug 2006, 15:51:09

Crude Oil dropped to 74.25 ... it had quite a descending trend today.
User avatar
mrobert
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 393
Joined: Thu 06 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Romania

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby drew » Thu 10 Aug 2006, 16:23:22

Tried to sell the Nexen today, but got home from work almost too late. Asked 69.70 at two minutes to close, and missed it by 2 cents...

Oh well, that's my two cents for the day:-)

Drew
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 11 Aug 2006, 03:24:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') personally believe the US is in the first quarter of recession as we speak.

My big question remains, will this recession cool things off enough to kill the long term PM bull or will we see further weakness in the dollar that will feed the PM fire?



I think we are headed in that direction, I do not think we are there, yet. GDP growth

Q1'06 5.8%
Q2'06 2.5%
H1'06 4.2%

H2'06 <2.5%

But, think that by Q4'06/Q1'07 we might be in the 1st or 2nd quarter of what may turn out to be a recession? I note that money market fixings indicate that 6mos. and 12 mos. LIBOR will be 5.45-5.47%, so the interest rate futures market is pricing in one more Fed rate hike and then that is it.

Never the less, I think we can expect two rate hikes between now and then to bring Fed funds to 5.5%. Afterall they are trying to battle underlying inflation, energy and commodity prices are high, and if the FED looks weak on inflation, the dollar is going to take a tumble, and that is only going to exacerbate imported inflation. Which would be positive your bull PM story.

The big driver in the sell-off in crude was linked to the terrorism story and a drop in airline travel, but even before that happened we have been seeing crack margins dramatically contract (and I do not know why given the draw in gasoline (-3.2 mio bbls) and the disruptions from Prudhoe Bay (especially to the West Coast))?

The gasoline crack has contracted from $21 per barrel to $10.55 in the past week alone! The 3.2.1. cracks spread is in from $16-17 to $10.80, so the heating oil has held up better than the unleaded. This may be on the back of the rally in nat gas, but it is pecular to the gasoline market, too, as the price premium between ethanol enhanced RBOB and MTBE unleaded narrowed from 25-30 cents premium a few months ago to trading around PAR now? A strange brew, eh!

I completely screwed up my Brent/WTI SEP bear spread. Had I been just a little more aggressive than a giant tree sloth I might have sold my WTI long out yesterday/the day before at much better levels, when the hourlies turned down, and been left with my Brent short down here. However, I didn't. So this morning I went tentatively long crude looking for the Friday bounce, thinking the sell-off was large enough, and those unexpected gasoline draws, pipeline supply problems and geo-political concerns surrounding the ME peace process seem to be going no where, so we might close higher on the day to end the trading week?

Also, Iran must give an answer to the UN by August 22nd, and they have hinted darkly that August 22nd is a special day on the Muslim calendar.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ') In Islam, as in Judaism and Christianity, there are certain beliefs concerning the cosmic struggle at the end of time--Gog and Magog, anti-Christ, Armageddon, and for Shiite Muslims, the long awaited return of the Hidden Imam, ending in the final victory of the forces of good over evil, however these may be defined. Mr. Ahmadinejad and his followers clearly believe that this time is now, and that the terminal struggle has already begun and is indeed well advanced. It may even have a date, indicated by several references by the Iranian president to giving his final answer to the U.S. about nuclear development by Aug. 22. This was at first reported as "by the end of August," but Mr. Ahmadinejad's statement was more precise.

What is the significance of Aug. 22? This year, Aug. 22 corresponds, in the Islamic calendar, to the 27th day of the month of Rajab of the year 1427. This, by tradition, is the night when many Muslims commemorate the night flight of the prophet Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to "the farthest mosque," usually identified with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back (c.f., Koran XVII.1). This might well be deemed an appropriate date for the apocalyptic ending of Israel and if necessary of the world. It is far from certain that Mr. Ahmadinejad plans any such cataclysmic events precisely for Aug. 22. But it would be wise to bear the possibility in mind.
Does Iran have something in store?

I do not know, it may all be conjecture, but we do know markets dislike uncertainty! Have a nice weekend and speak to you next week! Cheers.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Doly » Fri 11 Aug 2006, 04:32:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')But, think that by Q4'06/Q1'07 we might be in the 1st or 2nd quarter of what may turn out to be a recession?


Mr Bill, what do you think is the probability of something pretty catastrophic happening to the economy around those dates? You know I worry about the possibility of an economic hard crash, do you think that's possible?
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 11 Aug 2006, 04:48:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')But, think that by Q4'06/Q1'07 we might be in the 1st or 2nd quarter of what may turn out to be a recession?


Mr Bill, what do you think is the probability of something pretty catastrophic happening to the economy around those dates? You know I worry about the possibility of an economic hard crash, do you think that's possible?


Doly, the Bayesian probability of a hard landing in Q4'06/Q1'07 look something like this in my mind

continued growth
above trend 5%
soft landing 25%
recesssion 40%
hard landing 25%
depression 5%

But it depends on the Fed's willingness to sacrafice stability for growth (i.e. slashing interest rates as soon as growth slows, while exacerbating long-term inflation risks), and can the rest of the world decouple from a slowdown in the USA?

The Fed has not proved that they are tough on inflation, and are prepared to sacrafice short-term pain for long-term stability, as we have seen from their serial bubble blowing exercises and money supply growth, which has blunted any interest rate tightening.

Also, China, Asia and the current exporters of capital to the USA, including oil exporters, have not proved they are willing to suffer lower growth by letting their currencies appreciate, cutting investment in dollars and stimulating demand in their own domestic economies.

So it is a crime of complicity. No one wants to take the first move, no one wants to suffer the pain. So far everyone has been more than willing to take a ride on the US' faster growth and higher imports, at the expense of their current account deficit, and no wants the party to end.

Therefore, I either see a recession at the start of 2007, as the US cuts back and starts to work off its external imbalances, or I see much higher global inflation and a dramatically weaker dollar as markets come to realize that neither the FED nor the central bankers in Asia or the oil exporters are willing to take action.

So choose your medicine? Recession or inflation?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 11 Aug 2006, 09:40:01

The anatomy of an exchange's success...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
11:12 11Aug2006 RTRS-ANALYSIS-Funds flock to ICE oil futures exchange

Funds are playing an increasing role on oil futures market ICE, helping to drive activity to record levels and challenging the New York Mercantile Exchange's (NYMEX) status as the biggest lure for purely financial players.
European Brent, used for pricing around two thirds of the world's crude and traded as futures on the ICE electronic exchange, has long been regarded as a more physical benchmark.
By contrast, NYMEX and its dominant West Texas Intermediate (WTI) contract, based on a landlocked U.S. crude, is considered to attract more financial activity, unrelated to physical production.
But analysts say the success of electronic trade on ICE
(IntercontinentalExchange) is drawing in speculative and investment funds, who traditionally might have favoured NYMEX
.
"If funds see any edge they can gain, they are not going to have any allegiance," said Evan Smith of Texas-based U.S. Global Investors.
"My sense is that the funds like ICE," said Mike Wittner of Calyon.
"ICE has become a big hit. No-one knows who exactly is behind it but yes, funds are part of it," said an oil trader who asked not to be named.
A major indicator of enthusiasm for a market is open interest, or the number of contracts that have not been closed.
ICE said open interest on Brent on its exchange averaged 465,598 lots in July this year, compared with an average of 339,598 lots in the first quarter of 2005, which was the last full quarter before ICE switched to all electronic trade.
The ICE WTI contract averaged 240,000 lots in July and climbed to nearly 300,000 lots this week, roughly 25 percent of NYMEX's open interest of more than one million lots, according to Reuters data.
Although still dwarfed by NYMEX, the growth in ICE WTI open interest is viewed as extremely impressive considering the contract only began trading in February.
"Without a doubt, there is more fund activity on ICE," said Nigel
Saperia of trading house Glencore.
He cited the efficiency of electronic trade on ICE compared with NYMEX, although the fact many funds are U.S.-based could help to favour NYMEX.
NYMEX is also developing its electronic trade and will offer electronic trading of its energy futures contracts in parallel with its pit trade from September, a spokeswoman said.
"A lot of the funds are based in the States and many feel more
comfortable with NYMEX because it is a U.S. market," said Saperia.
Mark Matthias, chief executive of British investment specialist Dawnay Day Quantum, said his company had exposure on both ICE and NYMEX, although the bulk was on NYMEX.
"NYMEX still has more liquidity," he said.

LESS REGULATION
The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission releases data on NYMEX showing the amount of commercial trade, which includes oil companies and banks, and the amount of non-commercial trade, including hedge and other kinds of funds.
British authorities that regulate ICE do not require a public breakdown of players, meaning evidence of increased fund activity is largely anecdotal.
The lack of transparency is regarded as an incentive for speculators a is the ease of arbitrage trade between Brent and WTI since ICE's launch of its WTI contract.
"Most of the investment flow is going to go to WTI," said Olivier Jakob of Petromatrix, but that could be on ICE or NYMEX.
"A lot of financial money is going into ICE. There are less regulatory issues on the ICE," he said.
Just as the ICE has launched a WTI contract, NYMEX has long coveted Brent. It tried to capitalise on traders' initial suspicion of electronic trade by launching an open outcry Brent contract in November 2004 ahead of ICE's closure of its pit.
At first the NYMEX Brent crude made some headway, but volumes then dwindled.
One factor that will change Brent is the injection of Buzzard crude into Forties, one of the physical grades on which the Brent benchmark is based, later this year.
.
WTI traditionally enjoys a premium to Brent, but over the past weeks the situation has been reversed because of swelling U.S. stocks and a relative shortage of European crudes.
Whether any change in the quality of Brent would make it less
attractive to speculators remains to be seen. It could even have the opposite effect.
"More and more people are looking around the complex. People are looking for what seems to be undervalued," said Wittner.

Source: Reuters3000, August 11, 2006
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Chaparral » Fri 11 Aug 2006, 14:55:21

Those silver shorts I was swearing at yesterday saved my butt from a margin call. The collapse in grain prices today was wholly unexpected; took lots and lots and lots of profit on those.

Closed out all shorts in the grains today and now hold a considerable net long position. Went long on unleaded for a quickie little profit. I really don't wish to add to the metals position at this time, especially given today's action.

I need to research trading RBOB instead of HU. If it's true that Goldman Sachs and other players are getting out of HU then I need to do that too and do it yesterday. I have a hunch a lot of traders got put out of business on HU these last two days. Today's grain collapse was also IMO pretty overdone; the export inspections in the coming weeks shall show us the way.

It'd be fun to short the USD today but my play money is allocated to other things now.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby drew » Fri 11 Aug 2006, 16:14:21

Sold the Nexen today, late! Sure wish I got on line sooner. My tardiness from yesterday cost me 150 bucks! Still, I made ~750 bucks on the trade, can't complain too much can I?

I had a feeling a day or two back that the energy run up on the TSX had run its course. Would have liked to sell my CNQ too, but I haven't made anything on it yet.

We'll see Monday if I was wrong, or right.

Drew
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 03:32:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chaparral', 'T')hose silver shorts I was swearing at yesterday saved my butt from a margin call. The collapse in grain prices today was wholly unexpected; took lots and lots and lots of profit on those.

Closed out all shorts in the grains today and now hold a considerable net long position. Went long on unleaded for a quickie little profit. I really don't wish to add to the metals position at this time, especially given today's action.

I need to research trading RBOB instead of HU. If it's true that Goldman Sachs and other players are getting out of HU then I need to do that too and do it yesterday. I have a hunch a lot of traders got put out of business on HU these last two days. Today's grain collapse was also IMO pretty overdone; the export inspections in the coming weeks shall show us the way.

It'd be fun to short the USD today but my play money is allocated to other things now.



GSCI is long 72.000 caks HU and long 36.000 caks RBOB
they intend to close the 72.000 by 36.000 over each of the next 2 rollovers
they do not intend to increase their exposure to RBOB at this time and will instead roll that HU long into crude and gasoil
will look at it again Monday. have a nice weekend
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby Chaparral » Sat 12 Aug 2006, 14:39:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '
')GSCI is long 72.000 caks HU and long 36.000 caks RBOB
they intend to close the 72.000 by 36.000 over each of the next 2 rollovers
they do not intend to increase their exposure to RBOB at this time and will instead roll that HU long into crude and gasoil
will look at it again Monday. have a nice weekend


Hmmmm. Y'don't say! This makes for a rather intriguing possibility of shorting HU at the right time.

Thanks for putting that glimmer in my wicked little eye. You have a nice weekend too sir.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking
Top

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby cube » Sun 13 Aug 2006, 23:30:14

I got slammed hard last week with corn so now I'm taking a mini - break. I prefure to go long in a sideways trend rather then try to pick the bottom after a HARD drop....that never seems to work for me.

As of this writing (69 cent drop in crude) and it's only ETH. What's going to happen tomorrow morning? It looks like the cease fire agreement in the ME or at least the mere mentioning of it is knocking some of the hot air out of crude.
cube
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3909
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby MrBill » Mon 14 Aug 2006, 08:11:13

The market is lower mostly on some positive notes out of the ME here over the weekend, although skirmishes have been reported today as well. Basically, some analysts feel that Isreal may be looking at a face saving retreat from the border areas inside Lebanon, as they may not be able to make a decisive win over Hizbollah, who are still lobbing rockets at them, and they are not keen to leave more troops behind to secure the area. Therefore, a blue helmet troup may allow them to withdraw under grace. That is one opinion in any case.

The other part of the lower crude is the gasoline story. Refining margins have collapsed from $21 per barrel for unleaded to less the $10 now, and the 1.2.3 crack spread has contracted to the $10.25 on the back of heating oil holding up better than unleaded.

Funnily enough, unleaded also went from being in backwardation, preference for prompt delivery, to one that is decidely U-shaped or maybe saw-toothed shape would be a better description? It has definitely lost upward momentum, probably on the back of the GSCI lowering their outright bias for gasoline, and probably as we near the middle of August and it becomes clearer that with or without production from Iran, Nigeria and Prudhoe Bay (only cut by half in the end) that we are still well enough supplied to last out the rest of the summer driving season. Especially, with a rapidly cooling US economy in H2'06 cutting demand forecasts!

Heating oil grabbed the lead and now is higher at $2.0050 than unleaded, while the RBOB contract also widened to $2.0350 versus $1.9785 for the unleaded contract. As mentioned earlier, the direction of crack spreads generally points the way for crude. The daily technicals show that WTI might move lower now that its support at $73.50 has been violated, although on the last run down in July it did find support under the $73.00 area. Curious to me is that despite risk premia coming-off due to ME developments, Brent is still priced at a $1.00+ premium to WTI? Either that is a sell or I am missing something fundamentally that is going on in the European gasoil market?

Certainly a stronger dollar does not hurt, and therefore gold and the precious metals are also down today across the board. Ah, when the world does not blow-up, Monday is always a good day to sell, but where to from here? My bias is to buy the dip here, but SEPT or OCT? WTI or Brent?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby TheGiantWave » Mon 14 Aug 2006, 12:07:45

on Brent/Ti... the Sep arb rolls off shortly and if you look at Oct it is trading a 45c Wti over Brent. This moved up from about 13cents ovre on the Prudhoe story.

From here with the lack of hurricanes and the Prudhoe story less severe than anticipated I still think the risk is to the downside on this trade.
User avatar
TheGiantWave
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Trader's Corner 2006

Unread postby drew » Mon 14 Aug 2006, 16:35:06

Whoever said 'don't day trade, just buy and hold' is an idiot. I am starting to lose track of my trades a little and was pleased to find transaction slips for a purchase and sale of Nexen in the spring for 62 and 68 bucks respectively. I just repeated the trick on friday, having paid 60 and getting 68 for Nexen, again! This is easy money that's for sure. What was especially nice was seeing Nexen at 65 today. I haven't decided if I'll buy back in or not-I am worried about the US econ. folding.

Trading sure is fun!

Drew
User avatar
drew
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Thu 22 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: canada

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron