by Bas » Wed 22 Apr 2009, 12:17:03
interesting interview. And kinda unfair that America, where the crisis started indeed looks like the one who won't suffer as much from the consequences...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ne of the facts is if you subtract mortgage equity withdrawal from the Bush years, the real underlying rate of growth of the U.S. economy was 1 per cent. So much of the consumption has been fuelled by mortgage equity withdrawal. So that seems like a reasonable growth rate for 10 years. … We just don't have an improvement of standard of living of the sort we're grown used to. And indeed if you have a more equitable redistribution through the tax system, which Obama is committed to, it might actually be no discernible downside for middle America and lower-class Americans. So many of the benefits of the boom went to the elites. If you have a lost decade plus redistribution, it may not be that dramatic a change for many, many people.
underlying real growth of one percent...