Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Zeitgeist Movies Thread (merged)

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby scas » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 16:03:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'B')esides promoting and being boosters for this scheme, what are those with "changed consciousness" actually DOING to make it a reality?

Now that they have thought about it for a few decades (virtually all these ideas date from the beginning of the previous century), what are they DOING?


The fellow has made 3 movies that are available free to an enormous audience. Have you seen them all? I see that as quite an accomplishment.
scas
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 487
Joined: Tue 02 Nov 2010, 06:39:52

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby vision-master » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 16:10:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')esides promoting and being boosters for this scheme, what are those with "changed consciousness" actually DOING to make it a reality?

Now that they have thought about it for a few decades (virtually all these ideas date from the beginning of the previous century), what are they DOING?


Why must 'they' do anything in the material realm @ this point? How about just praying for others, forgiving everyone, smiling @ a stranger, or just imagining a better World?
vision-master
 

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby TWilliam » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 16:19:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'S')o we should not, in your opinion, point out any of the flaws or practical difficulties in this scheme?

No, that is not my opinion. Certainly the practical challenges need to be recognized and addressed. Do you honestly think that Fresco, who has been building and refining this vision for his entire adult life (he's in his 90s now), hasn't heard and considered most, if not all of the objections raised here (and probably many more besides)?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e should simply accept it and say "hey, that would be great if we could do that"?

That wasn't my point. My point was that one must first choose to believe in the possibility of a thing before one has any chance of actualizing it. If one believes "this is a waste of time", how likely are they to take any action that might actually produce a result?
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby davep » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 16:23:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m happy for people. But for those of us who don't know what "it" is, it doesn't help much.

I probably need to use magical plants or stop taking my medications, then I would know what "it" is.


Go to South American, visit a Shaman and take some ayahuasca. :)


And then come to peakoil.com to bore everyone rigid.
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby vision-master » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 16:49:26

rigid ppl, that does sound kinda like po ppl. :wink:
vision-master
 

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby TWilliam » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 16:54:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', 'r')igid ppl, that does sound kinda like po ppl. :wink:

Hah. Probably some of the least rigid overall... trolls excepted of course... :p
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby vision-master » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 16:55:57

Nay, they tend to be hung up on nuts and bolts kind of things, 2012 ppl are way kool. :)
vision-master
 

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby Ludi » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 17:27:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('scas', '
')The fellow has made 3 movies that are available free to an enormous audience. Have you seen them all? I see that as quite an accomplishment.



What are all the other people doing, though?

These ideas have been around for decades, what are all these other people doing with them NOW, in their own lives?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby Ludi » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 17:30:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TWilliam', ' ')Do you honestly think that Fresco, who has been building and refining this vision for his entire adult life (he's in his 90s now), hasn't heard and considered most, if not all of the objections raised here (and probably many more besides)?


I'm not talking to Fresco, I'm talking to you (and other "changed consciousness" people who are capable of lucid communication) here in this thread.
Last edited by Ludi on Wed 02 Feb 2011, 19:02:39, edited 1 time in total.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby Ludi » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 17:33:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('vision-master', '
')Go to South American, visit a Shaman and take some ayahuasca. :)


That sounds exciting, but I don't have the capability of doing that. :)
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby mos6507 » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 18:16:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('scas', '
')The fellow has made 3 movies that are available free to an enormous audience. Have you seen them all? I see that as quite an accomplishment.


Plenty of people can make a movie. What's the message? Is it accurate? If it isn't, and he wins a lot of supporters (as he obviously had for someone to plug it here) then is it really a good thing?

Since the blind spot that most people have (even those with the best of intentions) is thinking that there are no limits to growth and that we're not in overshoot, seeing yet another proposal that misdiagnoses the problem and fails to concede those limits is not something I'm willing to jump for joy over, no matter how many good ideas may be in there.

It's certainly better than a movie promoting BAU, but it's not something I'm going to rally behind as the original poster is doing.
mos6507
 
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby vision-master » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 18:20:56

moss, that last post sounds like doomer group think to me. :lol:
vision-master
 

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby IsThisRealLife » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 18:25:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'T')hese ideas have been around for decades, what are all these other people doing with them NOW, in their own lives?
I'm merely waiting for the day TSHTF. All my prep will buy a few months to a year if it's a real catastrophe. A few years if it's a slow decline.

These ideas do help for and with the prep. But I make no illusions. I don't want to live in an apocalyptic world.
IsThisRealLife
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 08 Sep 2010, 07:37:35
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby Ludi » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 18:27:09

Oh dang, how could I forget this example:

Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow opened in 1982!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiment ... w_(concept)
Ludi
 

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby Ludi » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 18:28:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('IsThisRealLife', 'I')'m merely waiting for the day TSHTF. All my prep will buy a few months to a year if it's a real catastrophe. A few years if it's a slow decline.



Doesn't look like you've bought the positive vision part, just the "we're in a world of hurt" part. 8O
Ludi
 
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby IsThisRealLife » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 18:48:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'D')oesn't look like you've bought the positive vision part, just the "we're in a world of hurt" part. 8O
Partly. For kicks, I think we're in a world of hurt, but nowhere near the Hollywood scenarios of post apocalypic life. The decay will carry way over my life span, and like you, I don't have kids to worry about beyond my death. Second, yeah, we can do tons of things to ease the pain of transition from the Age of Exuberance to whatever dark ages is in store for us. I do my small part, mainly small preps among relatives and very close friends.

For sure, we're not going to save the 310M in the US, much less the 7B in the world.
IsThisRealLife
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed 08 Sep 2010, 07:37:35
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby dukey » Wed 02 Feb 2011, 21:29:36

This movie is, the system is broken, we need world government to fix it.
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby Narz » Thu 03 Feb 2011, 00:01:24

I liked the first part quite a bit. The second was a bit overdone but I basically agreed with it.

The 3rd was a bit over the top with a lot of ideas about utopia but not really any details about the day to day life of these people, how they would maintain their civilization, protect themselves, exchange for goods & services (in their resource-based economy).

I'm not on the same page as the Luddites who deny automation can even achieve anything & if you don't know how to grow a garden using only a shovel made of twigs you're a useless doomed human, but the whole total-automation in the near future idea seems a bit far fetched.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I') watched the end of it, the solutions portion. Which is very Sci-fi and cool and the end of the film is very uplifting with everyone throwing their money away.

But then I'm left wondering how they are going to survive, with no money and no alternative way of life in place. Remember that city with those magical machines and computers hasn't been built yet.

I agree, I thought that ending part was utterly silly. We can't just throw our money away, we'd need to transition to a "resource-based economy", who's workings they never really describe. :cry:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'I')'m concerned that these people of the future will be entirely dependent on their machines, like the people in "Idiocracy" with absolutely no skills or knowledge to care for themselves - everything is designed and constructed and monitored by machines.

Well, they presumable know how to run & if necessary, repair the machines. All humans are utterly dependent on technology. The first thing anyone would do if trapped in the woods is fashion some (fire, tools, shelter, etc.), that's part of being human. A more technologically advanced civilization needn't necessarily as disconnected as our own if things were more efficient & materials could be created more easily (without oil ideally).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'S')o if for some reason the civilization fails, the people are doomed to die, even more than we are today. There's also no mention of any other way of life even being allowed - how could it be when ALL resources are monitored for efficient use?

Everyone's doomed to die.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', ' ') Anyone trying to live outside the system would be violating the efficiency and proper distribution of resources. Putting all our eggs in one basket, for sure.

I figure people could live as they wanted outside the utopia-cities as long as they didn't mess with them. If you hadn't skipped to the part you figured you wouldn't like you'd note the film creators had a bit of a romantic view of hunter-gatheres so if primitivists wanted to branch off & form their own society I figure they'd be allowed to do so.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'M')ostly, it's just very sci-fi with vertical farms, hydroponics, monorails, etc as in the best tradition since "Things to Come." Yet purports to be full of original thought...
That's just the last half-hour or so.
“Seek simplicity but distrust it”
User avatar
Narz
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:00:00
Location: the belly of the beast (New Jersey)
Top

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby TWilliam » Thu 03 Feb 2011, 00:21:11

I would lay odds that just about anyone who actually endeavored to live as a hunter-gatherer for any length of time would be sick of it in short order. It is not the idyllic lifestyle that many wish to paint it as. Even those few HG societies that presently survive will often eagerly adopt any technology that they perceive as making life easier.
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

Postby Outcast_Searcher » Thu 03 Feb 2011, 04:50:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukey', 'T')his movie is, the system is broken, we need world government to fix it.


I agree with Dukey on the overall message.

While I agree that if we could all just get along and didn't have to worry about real world issues like that there is a global economy, national governments, and 6.5+ billion (and growing rapidly) hungry mouths to sustain, unless I missed it, they didn't bother to explain key things like:

1). Who will be in charge to enforce the rules to make this Utopia work?
2). What will be the rules to, for example, "fairly" distribute "what people want and need" since there will by implication, be no money?
3). What happens to people who don't want to conform and obey the rules, whatever they may be? Can they leave the utopian society?
4). As MOS pointed out, NOTHING directly was said about resource constraints. Population constraints would be the obvious example. Who decides how many children families may have? What is the punishment if a family exceeds their quota?

I know they mock and deny the idea that this is a NWO or some sort of central planning scheme. Mocking and denial don't convince me, however.
Last edited by Outcast_Searcher on Thu 03 Feb 2011, 05:12:19, edited 1 time in total.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest