Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The year was 1905

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 12:38:13

Oh, another thing. If you look at the Nazi movement from the other side, as it were, i.e., with a pre-movement historical perspective (it takes some imagination and historical knowledge) what begins to dawn is the realization that National Socialism was profoundly revolutionary and forward-looking. In other words, the Nazis were the ultimate progressives in the sense that they were sloughing off the old and embracing the future. No conservatives, those guys. They were ultra-modernists, taking all the trends of their era and turbo-charging them. Racism was very much in the air in those days and had not become anathema until after the war was over. Even then, it took decades to play out the changing attitudes.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby Daryl » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 13:01:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'O')h, another thing. If you look at the Nazi movement from the other side, as it were, i.e., with a pre-movement historical perspective (it takes some imagination and historical knowledge) what begins to dawn is the realization that National Socialism was profoundly revolutionary and forward-looking. In other words, the Nazis were the ultimate progressives in the sense that they were sloughing off the old and embracing the future. No conservatives, those guys. They were ultra-modernists, taking all the trends of their era and turbo-charging them. Racism was very much in the air in those days and had not become anathema until after the war was over. Even then, it took decades to play out the changing attitudes.


I'm not sure what you mean exactly by progressive. I was a German Lit major, lived in Germany for two years and wrote a pretty long term paper on Hitler's rise to power say 1922-1932. They certainly swept away the old aristocratic military power structure. That was the primary purpose of the SA/SS. That could be considered modern since they were responsible for removing the German upper class from power.

They were arch anti-communists, that's for sure. I believe the communist/socialists were considered the progressives of the time, not the Nazis. They were also arch-archaist, with the whole attempt to unite German speakers under the highly suspect umbrella of Aryan/Teuton racial history. That tripe can't be called progressive in any sense.

Nothing progressive about the monstrous military/govt/industrial complex they put together to prosecute their attempts at foreign conquest. Auschwitz was an IG Farben factory using slave labor.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 13:48:50

Yes, it is paradoxical, for the Nazis were brutal and inhumane. But consider the definition of progressive: "Promoting or favoring progress toward better conditions or new policies, ideas, or methods: a progressive politician; progressive business leadership." Then there is this from the 1924 Progressive Party Platform: "In supporting this program we are applying to the needs of today the fundamental principles of American democracy, opposing equally the dictatorship of plutocracy and the dictatorship of the proletariat." National Socialism adopted quite the similar aim. The emphasis is on modern change (for that era) and opposition to Communism and Capitalism both. There was "Socialism" in the party name for a reason. The insanity which proved to be at the core of Nazism has, I think, taken so many of the political ideas of modernity and turned them upside down. Political thought and categories were gutted, leaving wreckage and confusion which still has not healed.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 14:36:00

There was an op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal a little while back by a woman political commentator, the gist of which was that there is a feeling abroad in mainstream circles that everything is falling apart. Nothing makes any sense and The End Days are upon us. She told of a little dinner party where Teddy Kennedy was sipping his adult beverages and expounding to his young friends that he feels sorry for them, because the game is up and in 10 or 20 years the whole show will have collapsed. Political discourse in this age is moribund, decrepit and inane. The center cannot hold, it's "all irrelevant". I suggest that the climactic moment of the Modern Era was Nazism. Everything since has been a holding patten made possible by the exploitation of the waning fossil fuel legacy. "Progressive" and "Conservative" no longer mean anything, and people who think they do are deluded, in my opinion.
Last edited by PenultimateManStanding on Mon 19 Dec 2005, 14:47:33, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby holmes » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 14:44:45

I agree with that PMS. Its nonsense this entire political spectrum. Its really only about profits and all about how to secure them by any means possible. Not much room for anything real and of substance.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby Daryl » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 14:54:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')here was an op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal a little while back by a woman political commentator (I don't remember her name for sure, was it Peggy Noonan?) the gist of which was that there is a feeling abroad in mainstream circles that everything is falling apart. Nothing makes any sense and The End Days are upon us. She told of a little dinner party where Teddy Kennedy was sipping his adult beverages and expounding to his young friends that he feels sorry for them, because the game is up and in 10 or 20 years the whole show will have collapsed. Political discourse in this age is moribund, decrepit and inane. The center cannot hold, it's "all irrelevant". I suggest that the climactic moment of the Modern Era was Nazism. Everything since has been a holding patten made possible by the exploitation of the waning fossil fuel legacy. "Progressive" and "Conservative" no longer mean anything, and people who think they do are deluded, in my opinion.


Yes, I read that. It was Peggy Noonan. I think she is has just gotten depressed since Ronnie died.

Have you ever read Spengler or Toynbee? They are old fashioned gentleman/scholar types, but they go right after the big issues. Spengler didn't live to see the Nazis, he wrote during WW1. Toynbee lived until the early 60's, I think. He didn't comment too much on contemporary politics, though. Hard to say with these things. Kissinger says he once asked Chou En Lai what he thought about the French Revolution. "Too soon to tell" replied Chou.

Older people are always complaining about the present and looking nostagalically to the past. I remember once when my grandmother was in her 80's. I found one of my father's old Benny Goodman records and put it on. She went nuts, cursing about what a bad influence Benny Goodman was. She was born in 1897. Those folks looked at jazz the way I look at Marilyn Manson.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 15:14:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', '
')Older people are always complaining about the present and looking nostagalically to the past. I remember once when my grandmother was in her 80's. I found one of my father's old Benny Goodman records and put it on. She went nuts, cursing about what a bad influence Benny Goodman was. She was born in 1897. Those folks looked at jazz the way I look at Marilyn Manson.
If your grandmother's mother had heard her, she would have washed her errant daughter's mouth out for cursing! :-D I like Toynbee and have read alot of his big A Study Of History. One of the "progressive" Australians (i forget his name, but he's the one who hates specop (not liamj, a different Aussie)) tells us the Toynbee is 'discredited'. I started in on Spengler once, and it all seemed to be about "being" and "time", you know, 'metaphysical'. My eyes glaze over when I encounter something a bit too 'metaphysical'.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 15:24:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', 'T')he brazeness of the rascism at that time is astounding.


In deed. In 1905, the eugenics laboratory at Cold Springs Harbor on Long Island had recieved a 1.5 million dollar grant from the Carnegie Foundation and was entering it's second year of operation. It would serve as the world wide center of the eugenics movement until the late 30's when the Nazi's started heavily funding the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.

Harry Sharp had six years prior in 1899 publicized his use of vasectomy to compulsively sterilize reform school students. The first eugenics based forced sterilization laws in the US were still two years away with Indiana passing the first in 1907. Eventually they would become law in 15 states. Most states in 1905 forbid marriage between a "negro" and a "white". In fact this regulation was the origin of marriage licenses.

It seems to me that the rising labor movement and the eugenics movement fit hand in glove. The labor movement reffers to the capitalist owners as lazy thieves and calls for a revolution against them. The capitalist owners look on the working class as genetic undesirables and calls for their extermination.
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby Daryl » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 17:46:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', '
')Older people are always complaining about the present and looking nostagalically to the past. I remember once when my grandmother was in her 80's. I found one of my father's old Benny Goodman records and put it on. She went nuts, cursing about what a bad influence Benny Goodman was. She was born in 1897. Those folks looked at jazz the way I look at Marilyn Manson.
If your grandmother's mother had heard her, she would have washed her errant daughter's mouth out for cursing! :-D I like Toynbee and have read alot of his big A Study Of History. One of the "progressive" Australians (i forget his name, but he's the one who hates specop (not liamj, a different Aussie)) tells us the Toynbee is 'discredited'. I started in on Spengler once, and it all seemed to be about "being" and "time", you know, 'metaphysical'. My eyes glaze over when I encounter something a bit too 'metaphysical'.


Yes, Toynbee didn't survive the modern scholarship movement in academic history circles. Like I said, he is old fashioned, focusse d on Art and Philosophy. That's why I like him so much, though. He tried to put a grand all-encompassing theory of everything together. Those things get shot to bullets by modern historians. Also, he's not PC, taking all those dead white males so seriously. Brilliant guy, though. Spengler's a freak. In modern terms, he even worse than Toynbee, he was only a high school teacher. He got laughed off the planet. I understand where he can lose you. You have to skim over alot of the obtuse stuff. When he gets it going though, he brilliant also. He inspired Toynbee to a great extent. Toynbee tried to tone him down and present his arguments in a more acceptable form. The basic gist is civilization grow and die, they can be divided into pretty clearly defined groups. Western started in Europe in the Middle Ages and has become global. It's in severe decline ala Rome. More a more modern take on the same idea, Samuel Huntington's Clash of Civilizations is good. A Harvard guy who's been run out of town by the liberal academic establishment.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 18:04:19

Toynbee's thesis that waning Civilizations turn to technology when the Soul of the Civilization has died and all the great cultural achievements are in the past rings true to me. I find it interesting that perhaps our greatest cultural endeavor is the Classical Symphony and the concert hall where everyone dresses formally out of respect for the dignity and grandeur of the beautiful music. The music that is played was mostly all written 2 or 3 hundred years ago.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby Daryl » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 18:08:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'T')oynbee's thesis that waning Civilizations turn to technology when the Soul of the Civilization has died and all the great cultural achievements are in the past rings true to me. I find it interesting that perhaps our greatest cultural endeavor is the Classical Symphony and the concert hall where everyone dresses formally out of respect for the dignity and grandeur of the beautiful music. The music that is played was mostly all written 2 or 3 hundred years ago.


Yes, very similar to Spengler, who goes on and on about the "peak" of Western Culture ,Rembrandt/Newton/Shakespeare more or less. What makes Spengler fun to read is he tries to connect all the art forms in the West around a central idea - space. He calls Western culture "Faustian" (from Goethe of course) restless, wandering unfulfilled. Although he considered us in decline, he also recognized this as the age of the engineer, while the masses were drugged with bread and circuses (Laci Peterson trials, SUV's and Super Bowls).

As far as Peak Oil, the engineers will triumph again with nuclear and renewables, the final death will be staved off for another couple of centuries.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 18:42:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', '
')Yes, very similar to Spengler, who goes on and on about the "peak" of Western Culture ,Rembrandt/Newton/Shakespeare more or less. What makes Spengler fun to read is he tries to connect all the art forms in the West around a central idea - space. He calls Western culture "Faustian" (from Goethe of course) restless, wandering unfulfilled.
I think I'll give it another try at Spengler. My guess is that I will still find his "central idea" absurd or pointless. Another one I would like to read is Goethe's Faust. Now Goethe's Sorrow's Of Young Werther makes me appreciate the contributions of Sigmund Freud. We may be in a declining Civilization, but some of the maudlin emotional problems of the past (and the attitudes of the past do carry on into the present, don't they) seem best neutralized by frank assessments. Sometimes I sympathize with the revolutionary disdain for "bourgeoise" society. But that's what looking into the past is all about: where have we been? how did we get here where we are now? As far as where we are going, you know, daryl, the engineers do reach their limits, and they can't work miracles. And I, for one, suspect that the engineers of 50 years ago were far superior to the ones we have now. Same goes for scientists. The current generation is standing on the shoulders of their betters.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby Daryl » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 19:58:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', '
')Yes, very similar to Spengler, who goes on and on about the "peak" of Western Culture ,Rembrandt/Newton/Shakespeare more or less. What makes Spengler fun to read is he tries to connect all the art forms in the West around a central idea - space. He calls Western culture "Faustian" (from Goethe of course) restless, wandering unfulfilled.
I think I'll give it another try at Spengler. My guess is that I will still find his "central idea" absurd or pointless. Another one I would like to read is Goethe's Faust. Now Goethe's Sorrow's Of Young Werther makes me appreciate the contributions of Sigmund Freud. We may be in a declining Civilization, but some of the maudlin emotional problems of the past (and the attitudes of the past do carry on into the present, don't they) seem best neutralized by frank assessments. Sometimes I sympathize with the revolutionary disdain for "bourgeoise" society. But that's what looking into the past is all about: where have we been? how did we get here where we are now? As far as where we are going, you know, daryl, the engineers do reach their limits, and they can't work miracles. And I, for one, suspect that the engineers of 50 years ago were far superior to the ones we have now. Same goes for scientists. The current generation is standing on the shoulders of their betters.



You should approach Spengler like anything, you don't have to swallow it whole, take what's good. If you like history art and and lit, you'll enjoy the book, probably learn a few things.

Faust is great, but it doesn't translate well to English, especially Part II. That's why Goethe has never really gotten his due outside of Germany. You're better off reading Nietzsche. He translates well into English.

I'm not a peak oil doomer, though. This is an interesting site, mix of engineers, ecologists and survival kooks covering a wide range of topics. I'm active in a few threads trying to challenge the doomer mindset. I think there are too many apocalyse lovers agreeing with each other.
User avatar
Daryl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 927
Joined: Mon 10 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby PenultimateManStanding » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 20:30:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Daryl', '
')survival kooks
I appreciate that you aren't a doomer. That's fine. I live here in the heart of Kunstler's dysfunctional Southern California. The energy spent here is astonishing. It makes me cognizant of the fact that we use vastly more energy annually than the sun shines down on us and that we get it from a one-time-only endowment of fossil fuel. You simply can't replace it with 'renewables'. And the nuclear option may come on strong soon, but it seems too little, too late. Call them 'survival kooks' if you like, but I'm with them and am taking steps, futile as they may be.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Top

Re: The year was 1905

Unread postby AmericanEmpire » Mon 19 Dec 2005, 22:00:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he energy spent here is astonishing. It makes me cognizant of the fact that we use vastly more energy annually than the sun shines down on us and that we get it from a one-time-only endowment of fossil fuel. You simply can't replace it with 'renewables'.


Yeah, I used to think technology was gonna save us many many years ago. But when you really look at the numbers you realize that we are in deep deep shit. Replacing our fossil fueled lifestyles with renewables is the stuff of science fiction.

Change of lifestyle and a whole lot less people on the planet is whats gonna have to happen.
AmericanEmpire
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu 14 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron