by AdamB » Sun 18 Jun 2017, 09:31:34
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yoshua', 'S')hale oil and gas production is still uneconomic despite "advancement of technology". When the "sweet spots" are gone and they move out to produce from poorer shale the debt on their balance sheets explodes.
http://peakoilbarrel.com/wp-content/upl ... 70209e.gifBusiness decisions and costs and running an E&P company isn't the same thing as the economic viability of shale oil and gas development. While someone with zero oil and gas business or project development experience (like say Art Berman or the remnants of the TOD website that was literally laughed off the internet you reference) are expected to be ignorant of such basics, there is no need to propagate faux claims. Unless of course your MEANT to distract from the same facts that got TOD laughed off the internet? That would be more likely, based on your posting habits, 6 year old articles claiming things that then didn't happen, bad references and not knowing the quality of your sources, reliance on commentary rather than the science involved, etc etc.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."
Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
-

AdamB
- Volunteer

-
- Posts: 11018
- Joined: Mon 28 Dec 2015, 17:10:26
-
by shortonoil » Sun 18 Jun 2017, 10:38:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')hale oil and gas production is still uneconomic despite "advancement of technology".
We don't have to wait for the sweet spots to be worked out to be sure that the shale industry is nothing more than a financial fiasco on par with MBS, and now the sub prime auto loan ponzi schemes. An industry that needs $1 trillion in investment to produce $362 billion annually in gross sales is a loser from the get-go. That is $1 trillion that the investors will never see again. It's a shame that so much of it came from window s and orphans, and pension funds. It is always those least able to bear the loss that gets conned into these schemes. There is nothing new about thieves and liars, it is just that they are getting so much bigger, and better at it with the advent of advancing technology.
http://www.thehillsgroup.org/
-

shortonoil
- False ETP Prophet

-
- Posts: 7132
- Joined: Thu 02 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
- Location: VA USA
-
by AdamB » Sun 18 Jun 2017, 11:40:02
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yoshua', 'E')verything is fine then.
You can assemble that strawman to joust against if you'd like, but I never said everything was fine. Certainly everything isn't the crap storm that the peak oil movement has been claiming for more than a decade now, but no, everything is not fine. Read a newspaper or something, get some information from a place other than the circular references used in peakerville, none of this is HARD to understand, and you don't appear to have the level of self-delusion that pstarr suffers from, so there is hope for you yet.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yoshua', '
') In the old economy E&P companies made money. In this new brave economy they lose money and that is fine.
Obviously you weren't around in 1986 when bankruptcies and doom were the order of the day. The oil and gas drilling industry lost more jobs in the 1980's then steel and automobile manufacturing combined. Between 1985 and 1989 more than 50% of the oil producers in the US were no more. How about you get some facts about what E&P companies have done in the "old" economy, prior to pretending you know anything about the "new" one, whatever you think that might be.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."
Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"
by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 18 Jun 2017, 14:53:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yoshua', 'S')hale oil and gas production is still uneconomic despite "advancement of technology". When the "sweet spots" are gone and they move out to produce from poorer shale the debt on their balance sheets explodes.
http://peakoilbarrel.com/wp-content/upl ... 70209e.gifOr when the sweet spots are gone, poorer spots won't be exploited commonly unless and until the price of crude rises high enough to justify the risk and expense of doing the production.
That's how business and markets work over time, for those who follow data and understand that the economy functions on basics like supply and demand.
And if some or many of them go bankrupt in the mean time, so what? That's what happens in volatile industries. It's not like the existing resources are going anywhere. And it's not like the technology (which continues to improve) used to exploit those resources is going away. And it's not like green energy sources won't continue to improve, which over time will help mitigate the global demand for oil.
But let's pretend none of that will happen, if reality gets in the way of the constant mantra of doom.
Given the track record of the perma-doomer blogs, I wouldn't bet a fast crash doomer's money on their predictions.
-

Outcast_Searcher
- COB

-
- Posts: 10142
- Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
- Location: Central KY
-
by AdamB » Sun 18 Jun 2017, 15:19:56
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Yoshua', 'S')hale oil and gas production is still uneconomic despite "advancement of technology". When the "sweet spots" are gone and they move out to produce from poorer shale the debt on their balance sheets explodes.
http://peakoilbarrel.com/wp-content/upl ... 70209e.gifOr when the sweet spots are gone, poorer spots won't be exploited commonly unless and until the price of crude rises high enough to justify the risk and expense of doing the production.
Sweet spot development in the Bakken began around 1956...and then petered out.
Of course, the crappier spots then got developed and led to one of the 2 largest producing fields in the Western Hemisphere. So sure, while the crappy, current Bakken development did require a higher price point to get started, you have just enunciated exactly why peak oil in the US was wrong....and for some reason, people never said that BEFORE it became obvious? Well, economists say it of course, but peak oilers can't stand them, because they know better than to use simplistic bell shaped curves that don't mimic oil production...to mimic oil production. Funny how the economists always knew that one, but Colin Campbell and Co. couldn't figure it out.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '
')That's how business and markets work over time, for those who follow data and understand that the economy functions on basics like supply and demand.
Yup. And why do you think, knowing this, that economists and their ideas that proved correct, were so discounted by the bell shaped curve zealots?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '
')And if some or many of them go bankrupt in the mean time, so what? That's what happens in volatile industries. It's not like the existing resources are going anywhere. And it's not like the technology (which continues to improve) used to exploit those resources is going away. And it's not like green energy sources won't continue to improve, which over time will help mitigate the global demand for oil.
But let's pretend none of that will happen, if reality gets in the way of the constant mantra of doom.
Plant Thu 27 Jul 2023 "Personally I think the IEA is exactly right when they predict peak oil in the 2020s, especially because it matches my own predictions."
Plant Wed 11 Apr 2007 "I think Deffeyes might have nailed it, and we are just past the overall peak in oil production. (Thanksgiving 2005)"