by SevenTen » Mon 07 May 2007, 10:44:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'E')xcept for PO and global warming. The difference being that we have testable hypotheses and empirical facts to back us up: things that can be measured concretely rather than taken on faith alone.
In spite of all these emperical facts at our disposal let's for a moment consider the variables:
Some of these variables can be defined in terms of other things, like:
1) Human behaviour - a function of stress levels, low stress means easily manageable, high stress means less manageable, extreme stress (as from sudden lack of food and/or water) means barely or unmanageable. Stress levels, in turn, are a function of the environment. Beneficial environment, low stress. Harsh environment, high stress. Suddenly empty belly, extreme stress.
How the environment affects us through stress depends on how well we can manipulate and shape our environment. We manipulate our environment by providing ourselves with enough to eat and drink, a place to sleep, clothes to wear, positive social interaction, and the technology and numerous tools humans need (computers, spades, violins, arrows, pencils, etc.).
If your family is hungry, you are under stress. If you have access to certain rocks, sticks, vegetation, tree sap, and some bird feathers, you can string a bow, fletch some arrows, and go hunting for dinner, low stress. If your family is hungry, and all you know how to do is nuke a frozen dinner, and all the electricity is out, high stress.
Right now, our ability to manipulate our environment is almost exhaustively and exclusively dependent on an increasing flow of cheap energy.
2) Technology advances - a function of the energy and resources available to the phases of research, design, testing, manufacturing, implementation, and distribution, which are resources
not being used for agriculture, war, or maintaining a cultural way-of-life.
The less cheap energy used to feed people, the more people will have to work the fields, the less people available to do research. In addition, the overwhelming bulk of our technology, and all of its phases, is geared toward efficient use of fossil fuel energy (eg, cars) instead of efficient use of human energy (eg, bicycles).
3) Lack of accurate data on geology - Yes, this presents a timing problem, but most informed people on this board will agree that peak oil is somewhere between 2005 and 2011, which means TSHTF between 2008 and 2014. Even the far end of the spectrum is not a lot of time.
4) Geopolitical uncertainty - This is a tough one. We're talking about risk of war, risk of betrayal (as in a government reneges on a deal, and money changes hands, but oil and grain do not). But these risks have a lot to do with stress.
5) Global economic system stability - Yes, this also presents a timing problem. It affects, and is affected by, human behavior, technology, and geopolitics.
But at its core, what "the economy" means is the exchange of goods and services between people. Goods are made of or with fossil fuels, services are powered with fossil fuels, people are fed with fossil fuels. Depletion will mean economic contraction, contraction will greatly increase instability.
6) Global warming - This alone has the potential to entirely screw us as a species. But we won't know that until most likely a decade or two down the road. Which, by then, will be entirely too late to take global, concerted action.
7) Disease uncertainties - Disease is mankind's natural predator, and we fight disease with sanitation, cooking our food, waste disposal, and medical care. The success of all of these depends on fossil fuels to pump and heat water, make soap, heat the oven, flush away wastes, visit the doctor, and be prescribed petro-pharmaceuticals. A decline in fossil fuels will result in an increase in disease.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t seems that in looking in the crystal ball into the future all these facts seem to offer little of predictive value.
Some things can still be seen through the fog. Perhaps your crystal ball needs polishing?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('NoLogos', 'U')ntil you can define *exactly* what you mean my TSHTF, how will you know?