by galacticsurfer » Tue 18 Nov 2008, 09:50:52
In 1991 USSR was a monopoly company. After dissolution of USSR, Russia with advisors from West distributed coupons to citizens in lieu of company shares for now created companies being manged independently by former workers and managers. The people were ravaged by shortages and massive inflation and had to sell said coupons to buy bread. Several very smart guys, for example Khodorkovsky, Beresovsky, etc. made out like bandits by buying up all the coupons and thereby gaining control of the largest industrial structures on earth for next to nothing. Such people are now around 40-50 years old. Some other companies were able to be taken over by former managers. This is besides the well known mafia protection rackets which savaged the streets of the big cities. My wife says that she heard the machine guns after darkness in St. Petersburg so dared not go out to Theater, Museum, etc. Starvation was a real threat to her. Thank God for Care packages and a friend of hersworking in import-export.
Borrowed money from the West is not source of Russian billionaires. If a major industrial nation like USA were divided tomorrow among 100 ruthless criminals and the rest of the population were left to starve then these 100 people would be multibillionaires too.
The markets in the cities were controlled suddenly at that time by Caucasians (Georgians, Chechens, whatever) who would force farmers at gunpoint underway to markets to give up their produce for a pittance and sell it at highest price in the city. Many of the current young Russian generation having grown up under worst unjust situation and is seething with hate and/or nationalist pride and skinheads roam the streets beating up anyone with a dark complexion. There are very real reasons for this hatred from their point of view.
The Soviet Union was a subsidy system for outlying provinces. The Slavs got the worst part of it-empty shelves and bad conditions. Caucasus, Baltic, Eastern europe, Cuba, Africa got money, weapons, trade and easy terms and the slavs got empty shelves. This was the price they paid to have a brotherly communist system, an empire. Now places like Georgia are bankrupt backwaters having a million of their citizens living in Russia sending wages back home so the families don't starve. Now Russia is for Russia. "Our oil", "Our land". Putin is religious and nationalistic but not racist like some of the younger people. Russia has too many borders and too many people of mixed blood (pure Russians without slightly slanty eyes like say Yeltsin are less frequent). Stalin came from a small aggressive Georgian minority people same as current Georgian prez and Lenin was a mutt of many nationalities
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Lenin
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')The family was of mixed ethnicity, his ancestry being “Russian, Mordovian, Kalmyk, Jewish (see Blank family), Volgan German, and Swedish, and possibly others” according to biographer Dmitri Volkogonov.[3]
So Russia is similar to USA with lots of mixed blood peoples and minorities but majority population in center being slavic (as in USA mostly Northwest European). The fight for control among ideologies/ethnicities has gone on since expansion was necessary to wrest control back from Tatars and to control the southern flank from Turks and similar.
In the central Russia farmers were enslaved as serfs. In the north where my wife is from they remained free farmers always and were democratic with similar rights for women and men. Many serfs fled to the north. In central Russia house serfs had a higher status than land serfs. The comparison to house slaves better status in comparison to land slaves in USA south and fleeing to the north is obvious.
Russian and USA history of expansion into foreign teritories with accompanying mixing of ethnicities and use of slave labour and taming of indian tribes(Russian were more like French Canadians in their tactics) is similar. It was a gradual movement East over hundreds of years while Americans moved west and imported Europeans, Asians, Africans, Latin Americans and was ruled by a small moneyed elite. Russia was not very different considering the different circumstances the parallels are striking. Empire and power has its costs in terms of changing national identity at macro and personal levels.
If and when USA empire crumbles and the troops come home and stop importing oil to survive what will become of equality for women, blacks, hispanics, Asians? Borders to the south and north, regional hatreds resurfacing all likely. Likely is that Obama as a unifier and someone similar afterwards can sooth the stresses. How can a multicultural city like LA or elsewhere exist under massive internal stress, already there is genocide by latino gangs on blacks. When localization means that all those immigrants no longer have a satellite TV link and internet and newspapers in their own language but all have to integrate fast, like in 19th century will huge swaths of America be no-go areas for non-local groups of incorrect ethnicity, skin color?
We can only hope that Russia really does not collapse a 2nd time but for good this time, with maybe blatant racists deciding to send 10-20 million "blacks"(anyone of Turkic or Cuacasian descent from formerly Soviet Union) back home and expanding the borders to Ukraine or Baltic. Similar worries exist about France, and England and elsehwere in collapse mode with Noth African, Black, South Asian, Turkish minorities. Best case may be like in Russia, a security apparatus takeover like in Putin's case, a man with high intelligence plus street smarts in one package not usually found in Western politicians.
Could a CIA operative manage USA through a collapse transition? Perhaps a global type of coup d'etat by intelligence agenices to implement by force the powerdown strategy. WWIII seems more likely although it is generally dismissed due to the existence of nuclear weapons. An all out civil war would result in nuclear attacks in Russia, China, Pakistan or USA more than likely anyway or sabotage on enemy nuclear power plants. Say racist Christian whites against liberal commies fight an all out civil war in USA. the firepower is all that counts in the end. This scenario is similar to Spanish civil war. That is why Obama win was critical as he is physically and psychologically a bridge to a new mind set. If there were no such figures or the economic/regional structures were too be cemented like before civil war in 1840-50s then it could possibly recur. If due to nukes no WWIII can occur then civil wars or regional wars in Asia(Chinese going to SE Asia, perhaps India), Americas(USA taking Canada, Latin Ameircia for resources) could take place as they are less risky for the aggressors. The aftermath of these wars would be a new global regional structure or else regional collpases. The larger regions might then remain isolated forever from one another as was the case 1000 years ago.