Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The problem with old people

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Pretorian » Mon 24 May 2010, 17:41:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'W')hat's your problem with what other people do with their free time ? You can do some intellectual stuff if you like.
People will find stuff to do.
http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/ ... icle/2962/
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t was an attractive vision, and it worked. Not only did Kellogg prosper, but journalists from magazines such as Forbes and BusinessWeek reported that the great majority of company employees embraced the shorter workday. One reporter described “a lot of gardening and community beautification, athletics and hobbies . . . libraries well patronized and the mental background of these fortunate workers . . . becoming richer.”



My problem is that often if not always other people's leisurely activities like the ones I mentioned before involve third parties which end up holding the bag. Intellectual stuff? Sssuuurree. I already can see crowds of " liberated" proletariat fighting for the place in line to the closest library, that they kept since the other night with numbers written on their hands. And if somebody actually CAN do intellectual stuff, why in the world he has to go to your work camp digging potatoes?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby americandream » Mon 24 May 2010, 20:07:08

Why not? Nothing like a bit of dirt to keep a tosspot rooted.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'W')hat's your problem with what other people do with their free time ? You can do some intellectual stuff if you like.
People will find stuff to do.
http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/ ... icle/2962/
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t was an attractive vision, and it worked. Not only did Kellogg prosper, but journalists from magazines such as Forbes and BusinessWeek reported that the great majority of company employees embraced the shorter workday. One reporter described “a lot of gardening and community beautification, athletics and hobbies . . . libraries well patronized and the mental background of these fortunate workers . . . becoming richer.”



My problem is that often if not always other people's leisurely activities like the ones I mentioned before involve third parties which end up holding the bag. Intellectual stuff? Sssuuurree. I already can see crowds of " liberated" proletariat fighting for the place in line to the closest library, that they kept since the other night with numbers written on their hands. And if somebody actually CAN do intellectual stuff, why in the world he has to go to your work camp digging potatoes?
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby paimei01 » Tue 25 May 2010, 06:19:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '
')My problem is that often if not always other people's leisurely activities like the ones I mentioned before involve third parties which end up holding the bag. Intellectual stuff? Sssuuurree. I already can see crowds of " liberated" proletariat fighting for the place in line to the closest library, that they kept since the other night with numbers written on their hands. And if somebody actually CAN do intellectual stuff, why in the world he has to go to your work camp digging potatoes?


He does not have to. It's not a "work camp" in the sense "all must work, no work no food", it has the sense of "we must get the basics for all with as little work as possible - so you can have more free time". And the work is shared. In the end - for a large enough territory that has all the resources needed, it will be no more than 2 months of work/year, max. There will be no more hungry or homeless.
Only he basics : food, clothes, useful items, some tools, basic shelter. Nothing more. Nobody will say "we must have a Ferrari for all, get to work!". Let people be free and they will decide what they want. Nobody will stop them doing whatever they want in their free time. There will be no "kill the rich". Work and be as rich as you want, build yourself a palace. If you find people who want the same thing - you join them. What you will not find : people who's survival depends on working for you. Not because of some law- but because there are no more such people around.

If the "intellectual" does not want to participate - he is free to get his basics wherever he wants. Him being so smart - he thinks this system of slavery must be in place, so he can enter a restaurant and eat. Maybe people in their free time will build restaurants, then - it's ok. Restaurants are not banned.

http://www.ascentofhumanity.com/chapter5-5.php
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')o most of the roles society offers, I say, "You are made for more than that." We inhabit, in the words of Ivan Illich, "a world into which nobody fits who has not been crushed and molded by sixteen years of formal education."i The very idea of having to be at a job "on time" was appalling to early industrial laborers, who also refused the numbing repetitiveness of industrial work until the specter of starvation compelled them.


Again, why do you care about what others do with their lives ? Do you think that people - having the basics of life, and freedom, will suddenly start to run around with hatchets killing people ?... They will find themselves again, as they were before the machine ( http://www.primitivism.com/machine-heads.htm )invaded their lives, they will find their hobbies, things they like to do, they will play, build, create, whatever...

Free people :
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/2010/05/free-people.html
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/2009/08/pr ... hange.html
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby AgentR » Tue 25 May 2010, 10:39:45

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'A')nd the work is shared. In the end - for a large enough territory that has all the resources needed, it will be no more than 2 months of work/year, max. There will be no more hungry or homeless.


You have an incredibly naive belief in the amount of life-sustaining, productive capability that most people have. Throw your modern, average, lower class hourly worker into an ag setting, saying, "Fly! Be Free." will simply result in millions of average, modern, starving, disease ridden people dieing horribly.

The land does not produce simply in the presence of labor. Even in the presence of slightly competent labor, the land will only produce for a few years, basically mining its on-site nutrients via plants, before becoming a useless patch of ground that can barely sustain prairie grass.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')gain, why do you care about what others do with their lives ? Do you think that people - having the basics of life, and freedom,


Producing the basics of life will require so much time, sweat, tears, blood, and broken bones, from Joe Average, that there will be no "freedom" of which you speak. Joe will thank the stars that he survived the days labor, collapse on the floor after having "dined" on about 300 calories worth of something resembling food, only to be roused before dawn to begin again his desperate labors to capture at least a tiny fraction of the dwindling productivity of the land upon which he was freed.

As to why someone would care that you would advocate the use of force of arms to take land that currently can only produce food in the presence of massive industrial inputs, give it to people with no technical competence or financial resources to continue the inputs, and then hope we won't all just starve??? Can't imagine.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')hey will find themselves again, as they were before the machine ( http://www.primitivism.com/machine-heads.htm )invaded their lives,


Before "the machine", human populations routinely hit hard limits in productivity of the land they lived on... and died horribly.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 't')hey will find their hobbies, things they like to do, they will play, build, create, whatever...


whatever... in other words. DIE.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby paimei01 » Tue 25 May 2010, 10:57:34

You don't understand. I am not talking about a "patch of land". I am talking about a system - it produces the basics, and the machines that make the basics. For all these - we need no more than 15% of the workforce of today. Starting with the miners. So - at a certain age you join this system, work in one sector for some 3-4 years, then you are free, and get everything free. Replaced by the next ones.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publication ... os/us.html
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')griculture: 1.2%
industry: 21.9%
services: 76.9% (2009 est.)


Services are gone. Industry - produces only a fraction, no more automobiles, and so on. You do not go over 15% of the workforce - not population.
I am not for going back to the middle ages. We need this system - there are too many of us to live free. Also - the oil consumption and the destruction of the planet will be 10% of today.

Before the machine : see the 2 links at the end of the post above. Also see:
http://www.ascentofhumanity.com/chapter1-5.php

Then the machine comes in:
http://www.harpers.org/archive/2004/02/0079915
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')griculture is a recent human experiment. For most of human history, we lived by gathering or killing a broad variety of nature's offerings. Why humans might have traded this approach for the complexities of agriculture is an interesting and long-debated question, especially because the skeletal evidence clearly indicates that early farmers were more poorly nourished, more disease-ridden and deformed, than their hunter-gatherer contemporaries. Farming did not improve most lives. The evidence that best points to the answer, I think, lies in the difference between early agricultural villages and their pre-agricultural counterparts—the presence not just of grain but of granaries and, more tellingly, of just a few houses significantly larger and more ornate than all the others attached to those granaries. Agriculture was not so much about food as it was about the accumulation of wealth. It benefited some humans, and those people have been in charge ever since.
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby AgentR » Tue 25 May 2010, 11:24:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'I') am talking about a system - it produces the basics, and the machines that make the basics.


And Agentr stood in the sand, before the waves and spoke, "I command thee Ocean! Do Not Rise!" And the ocean rose. And Agentr's socks got wet, and he became grumpy.

THERE IS NO MAGIC MACHINE THAT WILL PROVIDE THE BASICS.

There is blood, sweat, tears, broken bones, and rotting corpses.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby paimei01 » Tue 25 May 2010, 12:55:20

Sure. How can 3 million farmers produce enough for 2 billion then ? Where do you think we are ? The middle ages ? How many people around you see producing the basics, or stuff for the machines that make the basics ? How is it that we have enough people to build nuclear submarines ? How much food is thrown away ? How many fields are cultivated to produce junk like coca cola ?

Producing only the basics, means 10% of the oil consumption of today.
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Pretorian » Tue 25 May 2010, 13:23:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pretorian', '
')My problem is that often if not always other people's leisurely activities like the ones I mentioned before involve third parties which end up holding the bag. Intellectual stuff? Sssuuurree. I already can see crowds of " liberated" proletariat fighting for the place in line to the closest library, that they kept since the other night with numbers written on their hands. And if somebody actually CAN do intellectual stuff, why in the world he has to go to your work camp digging potatoes?


He does not have to. It's not a "work camp" in the sense "all must work, no work no food", it has the sense of "we must get the basics for all with as little work as possible - so you can have more free time". "If the "intellectual" does not want to participate - he is free to get his basics wherever he wants".

Him being so smart - he thinks this system of slavery must be in place, so he can enter a restaurant and eat. Maybe people in their free time will build restaurants, then - it's ok. Restaurants are not banned.



Yes, by all means this "system of slavery" must be in place, as these smart intellectuals who want to eat fancy food in restaurants while yokels are digging in the dirt made everything around you possible-- starting with the very letters you are typing with and ending with ability of 1 farmer to feed 1000 people (slaves, if you like) which you are so eager to use yourself.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby paimei01 » Tue 25 May 2010, 13:47:06

There are no stupid people. This system makes them.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_q ... gatto&aq=f
and
http://www.scribd.com/doc/6128489/Again ... ylor-Gatto
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27806948/Dumb ... ylor-Gatto
http://www.scribd.com/doc/27806789/The- ... ylor-Gatto

http://www.spinninglobe.net/condunces.htm
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') want to give you a yardstick, a gold standard, by which to measure good schooling. The Shelter Institute in Bath, Maine will teach you how to build a three thousand square-foot, multi-level Cape Cod home in three weeks' time, whatever your age. If you stay another week, it will show you how to make your own posts and beams; you'll actually cut them out and set them up. You'll learn wiring, plumbing, insulation, the works. Twenty thousand people have learned how to build a house there for about the cost of one month's tuition in public school. (Call Patsy Hennon at 207/442-7938, and she'll get you started on building your own home.) For just about the same money you can walk down the street in Bath to the Apprentice Shop at the Maine Maritime Museum [now in Rockport - ed.] and sign on for a one-year course (no vacations, forty hours a week) in traditional wooden boat building. The whole tuition is eight hundred dollars, but there's a catch: they won't accept you as a student until you volunteer for two weeks, so they can get to know you and you can judge what it is you're getting into. Now you've invested thirteen months and fifteen hundred dollars and you have a house and a boat. What else would you like to know? How to grow food, make clothes, repair a car, build furni-ture, sing?


And what do you think the great Albert Einstein says ?
Here:
"One had to cram all this stuff into one's mind for the examinations, whether one liked it or not. This coercion had such a deterring effect on me that, after I had passed the final examination, I found the consideration of any scientific problems distasteful to me for an entire year." - Einstein

School kills natural curiosity. Do you think "bored to death" is just an expression ? Look around.

Here, free people :
http://web.mit.edu/allanmc/OldFiles/www/levistrauss.pdf
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '&')quot;Contrary to the assumption that subsistence level groups never use but a small segment of the local flora, ninety-three per cent of the total number of native plant types are recognized by the Hanunóo as culturally significant. This is equally true of fauna: The Hanunóo classify all forms of the local avifauna into seventy-five categories , (they) distinguish about a dozen kinds of snakes, sixty-odd types of fish more than a dozen types of fresh and salt water crustaceans a similar number of types of arachnids and myriapods.
The thousands of insect forms present are grouped by the Hanunóo into a hundred and eight named categories, including thirteen for ants and termites. Salt water molluscs of more than sixty classes are recognized by the Hanunóo, while terrestrial and fresh water types number more than twenty-five. Four distinct types of bloodsucking leeches are distinguished: altogether 461 animal types ."

---

"Several thousand Coahuila Indians never exhausted the natural resources of a desert region in South California, in which today only a handful of white families manage to subsist. They lived in a land of plenty, for in this apparently completely barren territory, they were familiar with no less than sixty kinds of edible plants and twenty-eight others of narcotic, stimulant or medicinal properties (Barrows). A single Seminol informant could identify two hundred and fifty species and varieties of plants (Sturtevant). Three hundred and fifty plants known to the Hopi Indians and more than five hundred to the Navaho have been recorded."


Do you think they had exams or schools ? No, they were curious. If you have any experience of living - as a child (not yet killed) in the country, you may remember - how in a very short time you know everything about your surroundings. Not because you are forced. You are curious.
http://paimei01.blogspot.com/
One day there will be so many houses, that people will be bored and will go live in tents. "Why are you living in tents ? Are there not enough homes ?" "Yes there are, but we play this Economy game". Now it's "Crisis" time !Too many houses! Yes, we are insane!
paimei01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 539
Joined: Tue 27 Feb 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Romania
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Pretorian » Tue 25 May 2010, 15:24:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'A')gain, why do you care about what others do with their lives ?

Again:::My problem is that often if not always other people's leisurely activities like the ones I mentioned before involve third parties which end up holding the bag.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'D')o you think that people - having the basics of life, and freedom, will suddenly start to run around with hatchets killing people ?...


No, of course not. They will drink /do drugs first, and only then will start to run around around with hatchets killing people. Of course , they might use other items like knifes or hammers , or vehicles ( tractors, if you like , since nobody will have a car). And I dont think so, I know so.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Pretorian » Tue 25 May 2010, 15:36:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'T')here are no stupid people. This system makes them.



Yes , there are stupid people and there are countless legions of them. Its not like you have IQ of 200 at birth and get dumbed down to 100 ( 70 if you are a Negro and 62 if you are an Australoid) in 10-12 years of schooling. Schools do not exist to dumb people down. Schools exist to keep young people out of employment for as long as possible, to give jobs to teachers and to peddle some local agenda in young people's minds.
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby AgentR » Tue 25 May 2010, 20:27:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('paimei01', 'H')ow can 3 million farmers produce enough for 2 billion then ?


Simple. And its not their labor that is key. It is their knowledge and their resources.

If you double the number to 6 mil by adding 3 mil wage slave register operators, you don't reduce the amount of labor the first 3 mil have to do; you double it. First, they have to spend the same amount of their time doing what they do to feed us all; then the same amount, undoing the damage that the 2nd 3 mil did while pretending to be userful.

If you put enough wage slaves into the mix such that the 3 mil knowledgeable folks no longer have enough time to undo the damage, then the amount of food available to feed everyone starts to crash, and crash HARD.

That is where the starving begins; and it doesn't end until the human population has collapsed to the level that random gathering can support.

So please; keep the morons out of Agriculture.
Yes, we are. As we are.
And so shall we remain; Until the end.
User avatar
AgentR
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1946
Joined: Fri 06 Oct 2006, 03:00:00
Location: East Texas
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Pretorian » Tue 25 May 2010, 22:11:14

great post Agent, mind me asking why do you think these 3 million farmers are feeding these 2 billion? There is no way whatsoever 1 farmer gets to have any kind of goods or services from all 700 people that he is feeding. So why bother? Is he a hostage of these 700 people? Slave? May be its charity?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Wed 26 May 2010, 16:20:53

The marginal cost of producing grain is very low. Farmers are providing a generic bushel of grain. No one cares if Farmer Joe or Farmer Jane produced the bushel so long as that bushel is produced. So farmers have zero market power. They have to compete against every single other farmer to sell their product, greatly reducing the profitability of their business.

Moreover, the start up costs for farming are high. It can cost hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars to build a large, successful farm. Most farms are heavily mortgaged to pay for the equipment required to farm. The real reason American farmers are so productive is the HUGE amount of capital that goes into farming.

There is also a huge amount of risk in the business. If it doesn't rain or it rains too much, if it's too cloudy or too hot, if pests eat your crops, etc, etc.

Moreover, the average person only spends a small portion of his income on food, much of that money doesn't even go to actual farmers but to advertisers, fertilizer companies, tractor makers, taxes, etc.

Once you strip out all of the value added activities of the food industry, the average American is only really spending a couple hundred bucks a year on calories. That's why farmers aren't rich despite feeding 700 people. (Don't forget a lot of those calories are fed to animals, a high value added activity that reduces the total amount of calories available to society so 3 million aren't really feeding 2 billion)
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Pretorian » Thu 27 May 2010, 10:46:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'T')he marginal cost of producing grain is very low. Farmers are providing a generic bushel of grain. No one cares if Farmer Joe or Farmer Jane produced the bushel so long as that bushel is produced. So farmers have zero market power. They have to compete against every single other farmer to sell their product, greatly reducing the profitability of their business.

Moreover, the start up costs for farming are high. It can cost hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars to build a large, successful farm. Most farms are heavily mortgaged to pay for the equipment required to farm. The real reason American farmers are so productive is the HUGE amount of capital that goes into farming.

There is also a huge amount of risk in the business. If it doesn't rain or it rains too much, if it's too cloudy or too hot, if pests eat your crops, etc, etc.

Moreover, the average person only spends a small portion of his income on food, much of that money doesn't even go to actual farmers but to advertisers, fertilizer companies, tractor makers, taxes, etc.

Once you strip out all of the value added activities of the food industry, the average American is only really spending a couple hundred bucks a year on calories. That's why farmers aren't rich despite feeding 700 people. (Don't forget a lot of those calories are fed to animals, a high value added activity that reduces the total amount of calories available to society so 3 million aren't really feeding 2 billion)


Yes all that is correct Tyler, but you didnt answer my question. In my humble view of the world, everyone is (supposed to be )making a certain exchange when he gets something--like you feed me and I'll cut your hair, you feed me and I'll do your plumbiing , you feed me and I'l put you in prison when you are drunk, you feed me and I dont put you in prison as long as you do, and so on. Question is, how many hair-cutters , plumbers, cops, judges, prison guards, dentists, doctors, prostitutes and fortune-tellers , sport-cards dealers 3 million farmers might need? How many other servicemen those servicemen might need? 2 billion? Sounds like bullshit to me. So why do they do this risky and ungratefull job if an absolute majority of population does nothing for them, whatsoever, literally nothing?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Thu 27 May 2010, 15:11:55

But they are doing an exchange.

Example:

1000 people each spend $1000 on calories (the rest of their food dollars go to the various value added activities of the food industry like turning raw oats into name brand cereal).

That's a $1,000,000 that goes to an oat farmer.

But he spends $950,000 of that producing the raw calories. Trucks, equipment, fertilizer, pesticides, harvesting, hired help, etc.

He only keeps $50,000 for himself to live on.

That's how a thousand people get fed by one person.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Thu 27 May 2010, 15:20:29

A bushel of wheat costs only around $4.70 (as of 5/27/10).

That's enough wheat to produce 90 pounds of bread.

The value of the wheat in a loaf of bread is only 5 cents. You pay 2 dollars for the loaf.

The growing of the actual grain itself is not where most of the costs are in the food industry.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Pretorian » Thu 27 May 2010, 16:51:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'B')ut they are doing an exchange.

Example:

1000 people each spend $1000 on calories (the rest of their food dollars go to the various value added activities of the food industry like turning raw oats into name brand cereal).

That's a $1,000,000 that goes to an oat farmer.

But he spends $950,000 of that producing the raw calories. Trucks, equipment, fertilizer, pesticides, harvesting, hired help, etc.

He only keeps $50,000 for himself to live on.

That's how a thousand people get fed by one person.



well yes, i get this math sure, thats still not what i asked. What did these 1000 people do of value to make that $1000 and where the $1000 000 itself came from? Most of them did nothing and the $1000 000 got printed by the government or the Fed in case of USA. The government is forcing large and even small landowners to farm and compete with each other through real estate taxes and gives its citizens funny money to buy food with. For example, silver in our days cheaper than it ever was in human history,yet , you can get 355 pounds of wheat for 1 ounce? Whats up with that?
Pretorian
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4685
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Somewhere there
Top

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby davep » Thu 27 May 2010, 18:04:16

Have you never heard of Joel Salatin and the direct marketing approach combined with value added processing? :roll:
What we think, we become.
User avatar
davep
Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
 
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed 21 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: The problem with old people

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Thu 27 May 2010, 22:00:25

Some people worked in the flour mill which turned the wheat into flour. Others worked at the bakery that made the bread. Others put the bread in bags, shipped it to the grocery store, worked as a clerk at the store, cleaned the floor, made the broom to clean the floor, cut down the tree to provide timber to make the broom. Some people made tractors, sold tractors, repaired tractors, advertised tractors, made the steel that makes tractors, mined the iron that makes the steel that makes tractors, etc.

All of these people need medical services, educations, law enforcement officers, military protection, state health inspectors to make sure the flour is safe.

And so on.

It's all one giant web.

They earned the money to buy their bread by providing their labor to others. If you want to use Farmer Joe as the start of the web, feel free to do so. But you could just as easily use the President of the United States or Tom Hanks or Montequest. Basically, everyone works for everyone else.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron