I was reading Ruppert's site (so sue me) and I saw an article he had posted which whooshed me.
Here it is:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/aa447f34-f973- ... s01=1.html
It is about how the CEO of IBM argues "the company needs to move towards full global integration of their operations so as to stop the current unease about the forces of globalisation turning into an all-out assault on big business".
And later in the article says, "executives said last week that the move to a global management approach could produce productivity improvements of 3 per cent a year."
So shit, instead of US companies outsourcing to other countries to help with backoffice and manufacturing needs yet keeping the frontoffice in the US....now there is a further movement to move the frontoffice there as well, effectively turning the "satillite offices" into fully functional subsidary entities!
So that's the next stage, just outsource the whole kitten-kabootle!
Forget about white collar jobs in the US!
Sad as it is that makes total sense. Executives on the norm are looking to cash out, save money and profit, so it's icing for them to do this. As well, it's a real strategy for how to deal with the major issue of having different parts of a company in different countries when peak oil and geo-political problems strike hard. It's a win-win strategy in that sense which is why you can totally bet it will happen. However, it's a lose-lose situation for the US economy. Less white collar jobs means less money in circulation and more unemployment. It's amazing how this short-sighted greed is really taking us to the cleaners.
Total whoosh.
Banana Republic here we come!