by TommyJefferson » Mon 04 Jun 2007, 20:01:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JoeW', 'I') can't believe that the KLR wasn't financially better than just about every car on the road.
The KLR is just about the cheapest per mile bike to run.
Again I restate, you have to look at the whole picture.
What is the expected service life of your KLR?
I've got a 1991 Honda Accord sitting here with 220,000 miles on the clock. I got there with 3 sets of tires and a few brake pads and oil changes.
To reach 220,000 miles on a KLR would require:
How many tires?
How many chains?
How many brake pads?
How many clutch cables?
How many shocks?
How many fork seals?
How many spark plugs?
How many valve adjustments?
How many oil filters?
How many quarts of oil?
How many headlight bulbs?
How many air filters?
How many mufflers?
How many top-end rebuilds?
IF like in the manufacturing industry you keep a log book with repair and maintenance receipts and do a cost accounting when you dispose of a machine at the end of its service life, you will see that A to B motorcycles are not cheaper than a small car.
Most people don't look at facts. Most people don't think long term. Most people don't do analysis. The look at the here, the today, what they desire to be true.
Those people should go be happy in their truth.