by GregT » Sun 07 Jun 2015, 12:09:13
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ennui2', 'I') don't discount the possibility of an apocalyptic methane-release. But if it seems like the future is already predetermined and there's little leeway for any of us to do much at an individual or collective level now, in the above scenario, there's REALLY no point wringing your hands over it. And so I'm excluding that from the model. Same deal with a WWIII nuclear exchange.
So you're excluding from the 'model' what you don't find comfortable? This is a problem. Growth at any cost, while ignoring the consequences.
Maybe the future IS already predetermined, maybe it is not. We will never have any chance of finding out, if we don't stop the growth that will ultimately end very badly for every single one of us, and all future generations. (If there are any)
We either quit now and face the consequences, or continue down the path that we are on, and face even more dire consequences. We are killing our one and only home, and with every passing year the damage is becoming exponentially worse.