by pogoliamo » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 00:56:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'B')ut pull up a 20 year gold chart. Substract any nominal gains by inflation. You will see what a great bargain gold was over the past 20-years!
Exactly. Even if I think some will use the above argument as bullish

and wait for the inflation adjustment to come taking as base the 800$ gold from 1979.
To threadbear: sorry if the tone of my previous post was a bit too loud. I appreciate the discussion and I appreciate informed people, like Micki and Mr Bill, sharing thought with us.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Put that down payment into gold, watch it double (at the very least) while house prices drop, or level out.
This is called speculation. You are vulnerable threadbear, do you know what are the downsides of entering into a speculative market?
by MrBill » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 03:09:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I') wasn't meaning to insult Mr. Bill, who seems to have a good grasp on all things economic.
I'm thinking of brokers I've seen, in the US. It doesn't matter how smart these people are, as individuals, they are ALWAYS behind the curve because they limit their reading to the business pages, what they see on television, and in-house literature from their respective companies.
By the time it hits the mainstream, from an investment perspective, it's history. In order to spot a trend you have to read a lot, across a wide spectrum, and then invest within the sector of the trend when noone else is paying attention to it. Investing is an anticipatory sport. As soon as the word on the street is "buy this or buy that", that's the time to sell.
threadbear, sorry if my tone was so aggressive. I apologize for being such an ass.
you're right about investing being forward looking. usually the researchers, analysts and the traders themselves are on top of the latest trend, but not all naturally as we see a lot of their predictions do not bear fruit. however, even within banks and brokers the supply chain of information is long and by the time it gets disseminated down the line to salespeople, financial advisors or retail brokers they may have played no part in doing the research themselves, and are just regurgitating it for the customer. therefore, I would treat all research generated in by a bank or a brokerage with a healthy dose of scepticism.
usually their numbers are good and the historical data correct, but that does not mean their predictions will be right for sure! again, sorry the comments yesterday. cheers. mrbill.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
-

MrBill
- Expert

-
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: Eurasia
-
by MrBill » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 03:12:26
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', 'I') wasn't meaning to insult Mr. Bill, who seems to have a good grasp on all things economic.
I'm thinking of brokers I've seen, in the US. It doesn't matter how smart these people are, as individuals, they are ALWAYS behind the curve because they limit their reading to the business pages, what they see on television, and in-house literature from their respective companies.
By the time it hits the mainstream, from an investment perspective, it's history. In order to spot a trend you have to read a lot, across a wide spectrum, and then invest within the sector of the trend when noone else is paying attention to it. Investing is an anticipatory sport. As soon as the word on the street is "buy this or buy that", that's the time to sell.
threadbear, sorry if my tone was so aggressive. I apologize for being such an ass.
you're right about investing being forward looking. usually the researchers, analysts and the traders themselves are on top of the latest trend, but not all naturally as we see a lot of their predictions do not bear fruit. however, even within banks and brokers the supply chain of information is long and by the time it gets disseminated down the line to salespeople, financial advisors or retail brokers they may have played no part in doing the research themselves, and are just regurgitating it for the customer. therefore, I would treat all research generated in by a bank or a brokerage with a healthy dose of scepticism.
usually their numbers are good and the historical data correct, but that does not mean their predictions will be right for sure! again, sorry the comments yesterday. cheers. mrbill.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
-

MrBill
- Expert

-
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: Eurasia
-
by threadbear » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 15:26:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pogoliamo', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'B')ut pull up a 20 year gold chart. Substract any nominal gains by inflation. You will see what a great bargain gold was over the past 20-years!
Exactly. Even if I think some will use the above argument as bullish

and wait for the inflation adjustment to come taking as base the 800$ gold from 1979.
To threadbear: sorry if the tone of my previous post was a bit too loud. I appreciate the discussion and I appreciate informed people, like Micki and Mr Bill, sharing thought with us.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('threadbear', '
')Put that down payment into gold, watch it double (at the very least) while house prices drop, or level out.
This is called speculation. You are vulnerable threadbear, do you know what are the downsides of entering into a speculative market?
Oh piffle. I would have to launch into a major brag-fest to clear up any confusion in your mind, as to how "vulnerable" I am. I'll pm you. You seem young, so you are pre-forgiven
Mr. Bill has chosen a recent 20 year block of historical time, BEGINNING with gold priced at $800 to explain to you why gold may not be such a good bet. I could just as easily choose the twenty year block of time prior, where gold ENDED at $800 per oz., and draw comparisons to that time and today to explain why it IS a good bet. Both are looking in rear view mirrors.
I think it wise to understand that everything we do is a form of speculation. Waking up in the morning and getting out of bed, somedays isn't a good idea, statistically speaking. Holding dollars in an inflationary environment is a dopey idea too.
At this point in time, buying a house, in the US or Canada at the conclusion of a peak is a BAD idea. First time buyers should wait it out. People buying up should too. Any newbie taking out a 25 year mortgage that has to be refinanced every 5 years (typical in Canada) is not only engaged in speculation, it's speculation of the most wild eyed, foaming at the mouth, crazy type. I know--you can live in it. You can live in a rental too, it's much cheaper. Do your own research, though.
Anyone, and I mean anyone who isn't following environmental and political events, doesn't understand resource depletion etc.. shouldn't be investing at all. They end up being red meat for "financial consultants" who may have several conflicts of interest, some which they may not even be aware. The most common mistake they make is working around financial models that continue to prop up the present carbon based system. I'm certainly not saying MrBill fits this bill, to a t, or he likely wouldn't be on this site.
Financiers promote a growth model along the old lines --burn through the your own natural resource wealth, and when you're through doing that or coincident with it, go after more primitive countries (or countries that are at a military disadvantage) conquer them and burn through their resources. It's a model based on burning and killing. Look at how the defence contractors and oil companies are doing, right now. From a purely moral perspective, it's wrong, from a practical perspective, following Hubbert's curve, for one, it can't continue.
The only answer is a shrinking of, not a growing of economies, in the developed world. In order to shrink and have the ensuing pain somewhat evenly distributed among the citizens, inflation of the currency will likely take place. There will be synchronized deflation of current bubbles, like real estate. This isn't prophecy. You can observe the US dollar and what fiat currencies are doing against gold to get a feel for this. It's going to be 2006, on steroids, into the future, imho.
Mr. Bill--Let's save this thread and revisit it in a year from now. And btw, no harm done. YOu think I'm a cream puff or sumtin'?
by MrBill » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 15:30:02
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('hi-fiver', 'M')r. Bill:
If you'rs and Threadbears comments are stiched-up, and I apologize if that's not the case, what can you say about the recent tail wagging between the Greek and Cypress people concerning offshore oil rights? Is there some quanity of oil to be concerned about, and if there is, who are the players?
Cypress is a tree, Cyprus is a country, although a small and relatively unimportatnt one! ; - )
There is oil & gas under the eastern Mediterranean between Cyprus, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon. Turkey is not a player what so ever except that Cyprus is partitioned between the Greek speaking Cypriots and the Turkish ones. This conflict goes back some 500 years or more. However, Turkey's legal rights are flimsy. Cyprus is legally allowed to enter to into any commercial contract involving lands off its coasts as it sees fit within international maritiime boundaries. On this there is not much debate.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
-

MrBill
- Expert

-
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: Eurasia
-
by MrBill » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 15:43:40
threadbear wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')t this point in time, buying a house, in the US or Canada at the conclusion of a peak is a BAD idea. First time buyers should wait it out. People buying up should too. Any newbie taking out a 25 year mortgage that has to be refinanced every 5 years (typical in Canada) is not only engaged in speculation, it's speculation of the most wild eyed, foaming at the mouth, crazy type. I know--you can live in it. You can live in a rental too, it's much cheaper. Do your own research, though.
Anyone, and I mean anyone who isn't following environmental and political events, doesn't understand resource depletion etc.. shouldn't be investing at all. They end up being red meat for "financial consultants" who may have several conflicts of interest, some which they may not even be aware, the main one being to prop up the present carbon buring based system. I'm certainly not saying MrBill fits this bill.
Okay. Sure you make some good arguments in the post peak oil depletion model. But who said, markets can stay more irrational longer than you can stay liquid?
I saw a programme today on TV about real estate speculation in and around New York city (NYC). Basically, the point was that you have 50+ story buildings in Manhattan while over the river in Brooklyn, for example, you have only 2-3 story buildings. I watched a similar programme two days ago about London, UK.
It is not too surprising that speculators try to buy low and sell high.
One German woman bought an abandoned factory building in Brooklyn twenty years ago for $92.000 that was run down and needed investment, but all the same that building is now worth $20 million and change! That certainly outperformed gold or many other assets. Timing is everything!
Just anecdotal evidence, but still I think it is worth keeping in mind that if a building in your neighborhood is under valued and needs a little sweat equity, or if a neighborhood near you is rundown, but trading at a large discount to your house that it may be better to invest in what you know versus global macro-economics?
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
-

MrBill
- Expert

-
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: Eurasia
-
by threadbear » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:13:32
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 't')hreadbear wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')t this point in time, buying a house, in the US or Canada at the conclusion of a peak is a BAD idea. First time buyers should wait it out. People buying up should too. Any newbie taking out a 25 year mortgage that has to be refinanced every 5 years (typical in Canada) is not only engaged in speculation, it's speculation of the most wild eyed, foaming at the mouth, crazy type. I know--you can live in it. You can live in a rental too, it's much cheaper. Do your own research, though.
Anyone, and I mean anyone who isn't following environmental and political events, doesn't understand resource depletion etc.. shouldn't be investing at all. They end up being red meat for "financial consultants" who may have several conflicts of interest, some which they may not even be aware, the main one being to prop up the present carbon buring based system. I'm certainly not saying MrBill fits this bill.
Okay. Sure you make some good arguments in the post peak oil depletion model. But who said, markets can stay more irrational longer than you can stay liquid?
I saw a programme today on TV about real estate speculation in and around New York city (NYC). Basically, the point was that you have 50+ story buildings in Manhattan while over the river in Brooklyn, for example, you have only 2-3 story buildings. I watched a similar programme two days ago about London, UK.
It is not too surprising that speculators try to buy low and sell high.
One German woman bought an abandoned factory building in Brooklyn twenty years ago for $92.000 that was run down and needed investment, but all the same that building is now worth $20 million and change! That certainly outperformed gold or many other assets. Timing is everything!
Just anecdotal evidence, but still I think it is worth keeping in mind that if a building in your neighborhood is under valued and needs a little sweat equity, or if a neighborhood near you is rundown, but trading at a large discount to your house that it may be better to invest in what you know versus global macro-economics?
Mr. Bill, as far as the undervalued apartment idea, I did just that about 3 years ago, with great trepidation, understanding a peak was forming. I fixed it up and then followed local real estate forums very carefully. As soon as the newbie investors, from outside of the city, started talking up investing in my area , I listed and sold it within a week. Think it was about 11 months ago, in Victoria, B.C. Prices dropped or hit a plateau, in that particular market., in the Spring, just after I listed and sold. Return on initial investment? 70%
Sigh...What was a poor democratic socialist trapped in a ravenous upward price spiral generated by the excesses of capitalism, supposed to do, anyway?
I agree with all the points you're making, particularly the idea that all things being equal, real estate tends to go up, over time, (historically speaking)
However, when you are moving into an inflationary period, with interest rates rising and banks becoming more cautious, AND the general public tapped out, debt wise, you're in for the mother of all price corrections in housing. The downslope could go on for years, with prices plateauing at a much lower level, or rising very slowly from that point. This could take 20 years, or more. In many ways it should be the inverse of what has happened in the last 20 years. It will shatter basic assumptions that have formed in the last couple of decades, in which case, the hallowed principles of investing in real estate will be tossed out the window and investment in gold (alas, for many, in hindsight) will be seen as a safe haven.
There will be much biblical type wailing and gnashing of teeth, accompanying the high pitched squeals of the financial machinery as the unwinding gets going with increasing velocity.
by MrBill » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:23:29
threadbear wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')r. Bill, as far as the undervalued apartment idea, I did just that about 3 years ago, with great trepidation, understanding a peak was forming. I fixed it up and then followed local real estate forums very carefully. As soon as the newbie investors, from outside of the city, started talking up investing in my area , I listed and sold it within a week. Think it was about 11 months ago, in Victoria, B.C. Prices dropped or hit a plateau, in that particular market., in the Spring, just after I listed and sold. Return on initial investment? 70%
Sigh...What was a poor democratic socialist trapped in a ravenous upward price spiral generated by the excesses of capitalism, supposed to do, anyway?
I agree with all the points you're making, particularly the idea that all things being equal, real estate tends to go up, over time, (historically speaking)
However, when you are moving into an inflationary period, with interest rates rising and banks becoming more cautious, AND the general public tapped out, debt wise, you're in for the mother of all price corrections in housing. The downslope could go on for years, with prices plateauing at a much lower level, or rising very slowly from that point. This could take 20 years, or more. It will be the inverse of what has happened in the last 20 years.
There will be much biblical type wailing and gnashing of teeth, accompanying the high pitched squeals of the financial machinery as the unwinding gets going with increasing velocity.
I am the most conservative investor with my own money you will ever meet. I have no problem speculating with other people's money, usually successfully, but I have lost large amounts of my own money and I did not like it!!
Having said that I see NO unwinding of the global credit play in the near future. Not from American, Japan, China or anyone else that matters. I really do not! I see the near future as seeing very much like the immediate past. I can find no other path. And I have looked from a critical point of view.
I see uncontrolled money creation and therefore continued asset price appreciation. I am not saying buy any asset, at any price, but savings will be eroded through further money creation. Sad, but my best assessment!
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
-

MrBill
- Expert

-
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
- Location: Eurasia
-
by threadbear » Sun 11 Feb 2007, 16:53:41
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 't')hreadbear wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')r. Bill, as far as the undervalued apartment idea, I did just that about 3 years ago, with great trepidation, understanding a peak was forming. I fixed it up and then followed local real estate forums very carefully. As soon as the newbie investors, from outside of the city, started talking up investing in my area , I listed and sold it within a week. Think it was about 11 months ago, in Victoria, B.C. Prices dropped or hit a plateau, in that particular market., in the Spring, just after I listed and sold. Return on initial investment? 70%
Sigh...What was a poor democratic socialist trapped in a ravenous upward price spiral generated by the excesses of capitalism, supposed to do, anyway?
I agree with all the points you're making, particularly the idea that all things being equal, real estate tends to go up, over time, (historically speaking)
However, when you are moving into an inflationary period, with interest rates rising and banks becoming more cautious, AND the general public tapped out, debt wise, you're in for the mother of all price corrections in housing. The downslope could go on for years, with prices plateauing at a much lower level, or rising very slowly from that point. This could take 20 years, or more. It will be the inverse of what has happened in the last 20 years.
There will be much biblical type wailing and gnashing of teeth, accompanying the high pitched squeals of the financial machinery as the unwinding gets going with increasing velocity.
I am the most conservative investor with my own money you will ever meet. I have no problem speculating with other people's money, usually successfully, but I have lost large amounts of my own money and I did not like it!!
Having said that I see NO unwinding of the global credit play in the near future. Not from American, Japan, China or anyone else that matters. I really do not! I see the near future as seeing very much like the immediate past. I can find no other path. And I have looked from a critical point of view.
I see uncontrolled money creation and therefore continued asset price appreciation. I am not saying buy any asset, at any price, but savings will be eroded through further money creation. Sad, but my best assessment!
I use the term unwinding to describe what will happen with assets. Money will be created, but there has to be a proper delivery system, credit wise, and or rising wages for assets to keep inflating, across the board, in a perpetual bubble.
There will be price inflation in the supermarket, and China marts due to American (Canadian?) dollar devaluation. Food production will become more costly due to water shortages. It will take more American dollars to purchase products made internationally. Marketing strategies will shift with pricing aimed at the upper 20% of the population who actually have money left over in their paychecks.
Only about 20% of the population, or fewer, will have easy access to credit. I'm basing a lot of my speculations on the American economy. There may be a real divergence between Canada and US, but wouldn't count on it.