Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The L-curve

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby mos6507 » Sun 04 Apr 2010, 15:51:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '
')You were robbed even if you didn't borrow a single red cent. As tax payers we were ALL FORCED to bail out the banks.


Nobody ever seems to take seriously the notion of banks being too big to fail. The fact that we took one curve, all we can do is fantasize about the road we didn't take. It's conceivable that if the financial system had been allowed to collapse in the fall of 2008, as Peter Schiff and his ilk would have preferred, that we'd be busy beating back zombie hordes today instead of shaking our fist at TPTB for bailouts.

What I'm trying to say is that the system we've constructed is inherently codependent. You can hate the banks all you want, but they are the linchpin of the economy in ways that the average person has a hard time understanding.

If we want to throw the banks under the bus we better well have a way for the economy to function without them, otherwise by letting them fail, it all blows up in our face anyway.
mos6507
 

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Sun 04 Apr 2010, 21:20:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('efarmer', 'I') remember the good old days when they pulled a gun on you and tied you up
instead of loaning you money and letting you act like a rich fool while they were
robbing you blind.


Since when does irresponsible and/or ignorant behavior, such as borrowing money you can't afford at stupidly high interest rates, without paying any attention to the loan terms equate to being robbed? (Robbery implies with a weapon - by force).



You were robbed even if you didn't borrow a single red cent. As tax payers we were ALL FORCED to bail out the banks. The robber barrons in GS kept all the sub-price profits which made them billionaires but unloaded the costs of the failed mortages on to the tax payer. Classic wealth redistribution from poor to rich. Try not paying your taxes and see if some one puts a gun in your face. Got a problem with that then TS. America is no a longer a democracy.


I agree with this aspect of things, Novus, and see this as a rational response. I also agree that for any unethical lenders who deliberately misled folks buying mortgages, that they and the banks they work for should be punished.

I especially agree with your point about taxes. It is frightening how few people point out the immorality of taking a huge proportion of people's income by force (threat of prison) to redistrubite it to people with "greater need" or basically to steal/waste it as our government does. Ayn Rand did an excellent job of discussing this over 50 years ago.
I'm just sick and tired of hearing that totally irresponsible behavior by a huge proportion of people is fine, and that "they can't help it", by the likes of unthinking folks like PSTARR.

The idea of moderation, personal responsibility, ethics, etc. seems to largely be dead on the left AND the right - a massive symptom of society's ills, IMO. If you point this out, you are generally called "evil" or "mean".

When the productive class is willing to work FAR less in aggregate, due to being unwilling to carry the whiners who expect something for nothing around on their backs, THEN what will these folks get by on? The left will cry for more and more regulation -- I'd agree if government didn't screw up almost everything it touches, including regulation, so thoroughly. As it is, that just wastes more money for the most part.

The conclusion of Rand's "Atlas Shrugged" shows the potential end of the road the left would like to follow.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby Outcast_Searcher » Sun 04 Apr 2010, 21:28:33

Sorry for the double post, but for folks like PSTARR, to be clear:

I have no problem with taxes helping people out who actually need it. I would have no problem with a socialized medical system, for example, if they would just clearly define what it does, what it costs, and who it is for.
This seems to happen in Canada, France, and England, for example, but what we have at this point is a TOTAL MESS that looks to me like everyone gets screwed to some extent.

Where I run into the problem is that it NEVER seems to be enough. The folks who scream about wealth inequality via relative poverty standards (see Wikipedia on poverty) apparently won't be satisfied until everyone has exactly the same wealth. This implies ZERO incentive to work. Brilliant. :roll:

So it's about balance, and remembering that the vast majority of the upper middle class and even many rich small business owners (for example) are NOT robber-barons.
User avatar
Outcast_Searcher
COB
COB
 
Posts: 10142
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2009, 21:26:42
Location: Central KY

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 05 Apr 2010, 10:49:16

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', '
')So it's about balance



What is "balanced" about the disparity depicted in the video?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby Roy » Mon 05 Apr 2010, 12:44:39

I saw a story on CNN's Jack Cafferty show that relates.

It was reported that, among the top 25 hedge fund managers, their annual incomes for 2009 ranged from $880 Million for the 25th guy, AND $4.3 Billion for the top guy.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard someone complain about the money athletes and actors make, I'd be rich.

Those folks are a drop in the bucket compared to these hedge fund guys. They trade some pieces of paper and get unimaginably rich.

Certainly I wouldn't call that productive activity. Also, it is often said that those who profit most from inflation are those closest to the money spigot.

Think these hedge fund mgrs are close to the spigot, or what?
A nations military should only be used in a nations self defense, not to entertain liberal cravings for shaping poor nations into images of themselves by force. -- Eastbay

Shooting the messenger is typical when you are incapable of arguing against them. -- Airline Pilot
Roy
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1359
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Getting in touch with my Inner Redneck

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 05 Apr 2010, 13:21:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Roy', 'I') saw a story on CNN's Jack Cafferty show that relates.

It was reported that, among the top 25 hedge fund managers, their annual incomes for 2009 ranged from $880 Million for the 25th guy, AND $4.3 Billion for the top guy.

If I had a nickel for every time I heard someone complain about the money athletes and actors make, I'd be rich.

Those folks are a drop in the bucket compared to these hedge fund guys. They trade some pieces of paper and get unimaginably rich.

Certainly I wouldn't call that productive activity. Also, it is often said that those who profit most from inflation are those closest to the money spigot.

Think these hedge fund mgrs are close to the spigot, or what?


That entire post bears quoting. Even if these guys run the company into the ground, they get a golden parachute in the millions. If a star athlete single-handedly keeps his team from going to the play-off, he may lose his job, but in any case will not get a raise or a bonus. If an actor stops making money for the producers, he doesn't get hired anymore. His golden parachute will be in the form of residuals which all members of the Screen Actors Guild get, but his career as a "star" may well be over.
Ludi
 
Top

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby VMarcHart » Mon 05 Apr 2010, 14:21:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Outcast_Searcher', 'W')here I run into the problem is that it NEVER seems to be enough. The folks who scream about wealth inequality via relative poverty standards apparently won't be satisfied until everyone has exactly the same wealth. This implies ZERO incentive to work. Brilliant. :roll:
I scream for equitable wealth distribution, and equitable access to opportunities. Work hard, play hard. Don't work, don't play. Can't work, we'll help you with the basics, but you won't be playing. That's equitable.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby Ludi » Mon 05 Apr 2010, 15:03:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', ' ')Don't work, don't play.



How are these bo-zillionaires who talk on the phone and go out to lunch all day, and maybe shove a couple of pieces of paper around "working," actually? They seem to be playing for a living, yet they get most of everything (90% of everything, approximately). Some poor slob sitting around drinking beer all day doesn't seem to be in the same league as these guys. Why is it ok for them to play, but not ok for him to play, I wonder?
Ludi
 
Top

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby VMarcHart » Mon 05 Apr 2010, 16:16:41

I guess because it's an unfair world.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby MarkJ » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 08:23:22

Many local low income households would be in good financial shape if they saved and invested the money they spend on beer, cigarettes, liquor, drugs, lottery tickets, scratch-off tickets, junk food, soda, sports drinks, take-out, delivery, taxis, big screen televisions, laptops, netbooks, gaming consoles, games, digital cable, high speed internet, pay-per-view, cell phones, pre-paid minutes, rent-to-own furniture/appliances/electronics, buy-here-pay-here vehicle payments, tattoos, tanning, piercings, pets, pet food, vet bills and many other unnecessary products and services.

This money could be invested in land, housing, home/land improvements, reliable vehicles, tools, equipment, education, training, certifications and other forms of self improvement.

Many of our lower income tenants, employees and customers have had opportunities to buy extremely cheap land, building lots, homes, two family homes, multi-family homes, mobile homes etc, but they continue to pay 600/700/800 per month in rent, in addition to heat, hot water, electric, digital cable, digital phone, high speed internet...


Many low income households are doing fairly well when you combine the value of all income and benefits including wages, employer provided benefits, tax refunds/credits, unreported cash/barter income, unreported assets, unreported family assistance, public/private housing subsidies, Medicaid, food-stamps, WIC, food bank supplements, daycare, transportation, HEAP, Emergency HEAP, free/subsidized home improvements, STAR Tax credits, lifeline landline/cellular phones in addition to local and private program benefits.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby VMarcHart » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 20:28:14

Agreed on the first 3 paragrahps, but this...$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MarkJ', 'M')any low income households are doing fairly well when you combine the value of all income and benefits including wages, employer provided benefits, tax refunds/credits, unreported cash/barter income, unreported assets, unreported family assistance, public/private housing subsidies, Medicaid, food-stamps, WIC, food bank supplements, daycare, transportation, HEAP, Emergency HEAP, free/subsidized home improvements, STAR Tax credits, lifeline landline/cellular phones in addition to local and private program benefits.
...I hardly qualify that as "doing fairly well". That barely getting by, Mark.
On 9/29/08, cube wrote: "The Dow will drop to 4,000 within 2 years". The current tally is 239 bold predictions, 9 right, 96 wrong, 134 open. If you've heard here, it's probably wrong.
User avatar
VMarcHart
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1644
Joined: Mon 26 May 2008, 03:00:00
Location: Now overpopulating California
Top

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby Ludi » Wed 07 Apr 2010, 20:30:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('VMarcHart', 'I') hardly qualify that as "doing fairly well". That barely getting by, Mark.




Everyone knows the poor are doing quite well because of all this great free stuff. Makes you wonder why anyone bothers working!
Ludi
 
Top

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby MarkJ » Thu 08 Apr 2010, 12:01:09

The majority of recipients of government, state, local and private freebies and subsidies work and/or have other sources of reported/unreported individual or household income/benefits/services.

Even in the poorest local regions, cash assistance caseloads have dropped substantially due to the strict work search requirements and mandatory participation in work or training activities assigned by social services.

NEW YORK STATE
TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE AND FOOD STAMP
EMPLOYMENT POLICY MANUAL


http://www.otda.state.ny.us/MAIN/resour ... manual.pdf


As they've raised income limits, many renters, homeowners or landlords now qualify for benefits once limited to very low income households. For example, a household of 5 with a gross monthly income of $4,500 now qualifies for HEAP, Emergency HEAP, Furnace/Boiler Maintenance/Repair/Replacement.

They've also raised the amounts of some benefits to cover the rising cost of fuel, service, professional labor, materials, parts-markup and installations, plus they'll negotiate cost over-runs on a case by case basis.
User avatar
MarkJ
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue 25 Mar 2008, 03:00:00

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby TWilliam » Fri 09 Apr 2010, 16:43:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mos6507', 'I')f we want to throw the banks under the bus we better well have a way for the economy to function without them

Ummm... government issuing money directly, without being required to 'borrow' it at interest into existence from the bankers, seems to have worked pretty well in the past. Well, unless of course you were a banker I suppose...
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: The L-curve

Unread postby Cloud9 » Sat 10 Apr 2010, 11:26:05

This is a good read from Seeking Alpha the similarities of todays headlines with those of the 1930's are chilling.

http://seekingalpha.com/article/197964- ... -new-again
User avatar
Cloud9
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2961
Joined: Wed 26 Jul 2006, 03:00:00

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron