by Petrodollar » Thu 07 Aug 2008, 10:34:00
...and here's why future historians are likely to be far kinder to Carter than all subsequent US presidents...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e are grossly wasting our energy resources … as though their supply was infinite. We must even face the prospect of changing our basic ways of living. This change will either be made on our own initiative in a planned and rational way, or forced on us with chaos and suffering by the inexorable laws of nature.
— Jimmy Carter's Address for the 1976 Democratic Presidential Nomination, December 12, 1976
......Indeed, Jimmy Carter has been the only president in the past 30 years who tryed to convince us that we must begin changing "our basic ways of living" - preferrably before Mother Nature forces us to change via "chaos and suffering..."
In contrast, and despite the rightwing proclamations to the contrary about Carter and Bush, here's why historians will likely be extreme harsh on the presidency of G.W. Bush....
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]We need an energy bill that encourages consumption.
— President George W. Bush, speech in Trenton, New Jersey, September 23, 2002
In essence, Dick Cheney famously stated that the "American way of life is not negotiable"- whereas Carter tried to tell us that the "American way of life" is not only negotiable, but is is actually
Anyhow, assuming he is elected, Barak Obama will likely have to repeat Carter's earlier message in a State of the Union speech circa 2010 or 2011, but this time we won't have 30 years to prepare for these massive changes "on our own initiative in a planned and rational way," as we are already witnessing in the global production and price of oil over the past 3 years, these changes will by 2010-2011 be "forced on us with chaos and suffering by the inexorable laws of nature."
Bottomline: I do not envy the arduous and painful journey that awaits the next US president (or any major political leader for that matter)