Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Iraqi Civil War Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sat 11 Mar 2006, 21:24:00

I'm a republican. In 2003 I knew there would be civil war in Iraq.

Since I'm a conservative, I was against the Iraq war from day one.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby coyote » Sat 11 Mar 2006, 21:48:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', 'I')'m a republican. In 2003 I knew there would be civil war in Iraq.

Since I'm a conservative, I was against the Iraq war from day one.

Since I'm a liberal, I was against the Iraq war from day one. :)

Being against an illegal, expensive, destructive, preemptive invasive war that has no international approval is not conservative or liberal. It's just rational.
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby LadyRuby » Sat 11 Mar 2006, 22:21:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', 'D')o you guys think that Congress will support a war with Iran?

There is a steady drumbeat of war that is so similar to the lead up to Iraq, it gives me a horrible feeling in my stomach. If our leader and your leader team up again and decide "what the hell, let's go down in flames. God made us do it", I hate to think what may happen.

Maybe this time I really should go on the "No war on Iran" march.


The administration certainly is acting like it's ready to attack Iran militarily. But I think it's all talk. The military is already stretched so thin, I don't think anyone expects the US could really spread itself any thinner.

Even if Bush would want to attack Iran, I think congress recognizes that Iraq has been a disaster and they can't afford to support another disaster.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby Tyler_JC » Sat 11 Mar 2006, 22:46:27

The following Republican Senators are in serious trouble.


Name_________approval rating
James Inhofe 45%
Conrad Burns 45%
Jim Bunning 45%
Wayne Allard 45%
Mel Martinez 46%
John Cornyn 46%

The list of GOP Senators with approval ratings below 50% is impressive. 14 by last count. If the Democrats are able to pick up all of those seats...forget it. We will be looking at a lame duck president.

To be fair, there are 5 or 6 Democratic Senators with simillarly low approval ratings, but even if those ones swtich parties too...the Republican Party is still in trouble.

But the good news is that most of those unpopular Senators aren't up for re-election any time soon!

The pictures looks much worse in the House of Representatives (where elections are re-elected every 2 years and there is a far greater connection to the people).

"37%: percentage of people in the latest poll who approve of the way Congress is doing its job"
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington ... poll_x.htm

OUCH.

Not looking good.
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sun 12 Mar 2006, 02:18:52

Conservative republicans in Texas are angry with Senator John Cornyn for supporting Bush's open borders policy.

Corporate interests are flooding the US with cheap labor. Although this leftist article explains why, it is clueless about what is a "conservative". Fortunately, we have more votes than the corporations.

Real conservatives don't believe in empire building. I wish we could run all these stupid war-mongers back to the democratic party where they came from.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby UIUCstudent01 » Sun 12 Mar 2006, 05:16:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TommyJefferson', 'R')eal conservatives don't believe in empire building. I wish we could run all these stupid war-mongers back to the democratic party where they came from.


Most of the democrats base don't believe in empire-building either...

So, how are we in this mess?

:)

(Votes don't matter if both politicians are paid off.)
User avatar
UIUCstudent01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby Kickinthegob » Sun 12 Mar 2006, 06:45:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bobcousins', 'T')here is a steady drumbeat of war that is so similar to the lead up to Iraq, it gives me a horrible feeling in my stomach. If our leader and your leader team up again and decide "what the hell, let's go down in flames. God made us do it", I hate to think what may happen.

Maybe this time I really should go on the "No war on Iran" march.

I got a horrible feeling that the show is just beginning, nobody has tomorrows newspaper but it will take more than a few "approval" polls to stop a neocon plan that was set in motion more than 20 years ago. IMO they have more power now than ever before and probably don't give a sh*t about approval polls at this point in the game. My .02
User avatar
Kickinthegob
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby gg3 » Sun 12 Mar 2006, 07:39:25

This is the point where honest conservatives and honest liberals recognize that they agree and have common cause. It may be a bit uncomfortable, and there may still be some mutual barbs traded back and forth, but the underlying consensus is there and growing.

= One, we never should have gone into Iraq. Yes Saddam was a monster. But as in Yugoslavia, the big monster was keeping a lid on the numerous smaller monsters that were waiting to come out of the woodwork. In any case the war was militarily imprudent: the Iraq threat was well-contained with inspections and surveillance, including no doubt an NRO bird parked above to keep the live video flowing. But, having gone to war, it should at least have been managed competently. It has not been. The incompetence is second only to the imprudence.

= Two, we have lost moral legitimacy. Historically, torture has occasionally happened in the heat of battlefield conditions; but the switch to torture-as-policy is the moral equivalent of selling one's soul to the Devil. Historically, illegal acts on the part of government were cause for shame; the switch to overt boasting about it (standing up for broad-spectrum surveillance in violation of FISA) is the moral equivalent of doing one's Devil-worship in public.

= Three, we have seen the powers of government grow in a manner that is only exceeded by the growth of the national debt. Both of these, the excesses of power and the financial recklessness, stand in sharp opposition to everything that responsible liberals and conservatives believe in. And while we may in normal times argue about whether this or that piece of regulatory legislation or spending authorization is really necessary, there is no question that the excesses we see today are truly beyond the pale.

And so we join hands across the aisle and seek to revive the American tradition of "throwing the rascals out." I for one will welcome the day when the Republicans put forward another Eisenhower, the Democrats put forward another JFK, and the national spotlight can be focused on our best potential rather than our basest instincts.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby LadyRuby » Sun 12 Mar 2006, 10:18:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'T')his is the point where honest conservatives and honest liberals recognize that they agree and have common cause. It may be a bit uncomfortable, and there may still be some mutual barbs traded back and forth, but the underlying consensus is there and growing.

= One, we never should have gone into Iraq. Yes Saddam was a monster. But as in Yugoslavia, the big monster was keeping a lid on the numerous smaller monsters that were waiting to come out of the woodwork. In any case the war was militarily imprudent: the Iraq threat was well-contained with inspections and surveillance, including no doubt an NRO bird parked above to keep the live video flowing. But, having gone to war, it should at least have been managed competently. It has not been. The incompetence is second only to the imprudence.

= Two, we have lost moral legitimacy. Historically, torture has occasionally happened in the heat of battlefield conditions; but the switch to torture-as-policy is the moral equivalent of selling one's soul to the Devil. Historically, illegal acts on the part of government were cause for shame; the switch to overt boasting about it (standing up for broad-spectrum surveillance in violation of FISA) is the moral equivalent of doing one's Devil-worship in public.

= Three, we have seen the powers of government grow in a manner that is only exceeded by the growth of the national debt. Both of these, the excesses of power and the financial recklessness, stand in sharp opposition to everything that responsible liberals and conservatives believe in. And while we may in normal times argue about whether this or that piece of regulatory legislation or spending authorization is really necessary, there is no question that the excesses we see today are truly beyond the pale.

And so we join hands across the aisle and seek to revive the American tradition of "throwing the rascals out." I for one will welcome the day when the Republicans put forward another Eisenhower, the Democrats put forward another JFK, and the national spotlight can be focused on our best potential rather than our basest instincts.


Well said, GG3.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Re: Poll: 70% of Republicans believe civil war imminent in

Unread postby TommyJefferson » Sun 12 Mar 2006, 13:57:37

Well said again GG3.

Last week in the Texas repubilcan primary I voted against every incumbent on the ticket.

My votes were over-ridden by the party faithful, but next election I'll try to persuade even more people to throw the rascals out.
Conform . Consume . Obey .
User avatar
TommyJefferson
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1757
Joined: Thu 19 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Texas and Los Angeles

Families In Iraq Preparing for War

Unread postby Magus » Thu 16 Mar 2006, 18:20:47

Article from San Francisco Chronicle: Ordinary Iraqi families getting ready to fight--They're stockpiling weapons, food and fuel

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')aghdad -- Om Hussein, wrapped in her black abaya, lists the contents of the family's walk-in storage closet: three 175-pound cases of rice, two 33-pound cases of cooking fat, six cases of canned tomatoes, three crates of assorted legumes, a one-month supply of drinking water, frozen chicken livers in the freezer. And in the garage, jerry cans filled with fuel are piled floor to ceiling.

Om Hussein, who was reluctant to give her full name, and her Shiite family are preparing for war. They've stocked up on food. They bought a Kalashnikov rifle and a second car -- so that there is space for all 13 members of their extended family should they need to flee in a hurry.

"We are afraid of what will happen in the coming days," she says. "Maybe there will be a monthlong curfew, or maybe fighting in the streets will force my family to stay in the house for days at a time."

In the past week, President Bush has tried to assure Americans that Iraq has stepped back from the brink of civil war. "Iraqis have shown the world they want a future of freedom and peace," he told the Foundation for Defense of Democracies on Monday.

Few Iraqis, however, share Bush's view that the crisis has been averted. They are readying themselves for the worst, fleeing likely flash points, stockpiling weapons and basic foodstuffs, barricading their neighborhoods, and drawing lines in the sand delineating Sunni and Shiite territory.



It appears the the Iraqi citizenry disagree with Mr. Bush and the Neo-cons assessment of the situation...
Last edited by Magus on Thu 16 Mar 2006, 19:14:43, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Magus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat 18 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Earth
Top

Re: Families In Iraq Preparing for War

Unread postby Chocky » Thu 16 Mar 2006, 19:06:20

Smart people. Interesting that even under Saddam every family could own one AK-47 rifle.
User avatar
Chocky
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Land of Do-As-You-Please

Re: Families In Iraq Preparing for War

Unread postby RonMN » Thu 16 Mar 2006, 22:33:03

Funny. I remember at the beginning of gulf war 1 (under bush senior) that sadam threatened death to anybody "hoarding" food or other vital supplies. Now they have the freedom to stock up on such goods.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes.
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: Families In Iraq Preparing for War

Unread postby rogerhb » Fri 17 Mar 2006, 01:37:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', 'N')ow they have the freedom to stock up on such goods.


... thats assuming they can actually get hold of any goods.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Is Iraq Just a Post-Oil Training Ground?

Unread postby directinfo » Sun 26 Mar 2006, 01:14:50

Image

Behind the stories of very personalized death and civil war (click for today's latest in NY Times) in Iraq, we can see the truth revealing itself to us. None of us dare whisper this fearsome truth because to do so may bring the reality into our unprepared mind. If you dare whisper, you say: "Iraq is the training ground. We are the target."

The US is preparing for how to consolidate power when the peak oil dieoff starts in earnest. Look: 14 permanent and hardened military bases and fomenting racial strife towards an instigated civil war. What else do you need to see?

This is the future of America if we don't get a clue and stop this madness of "pre-emptive war". We are killing Iraq for oil and this crime will come back to haunt us. There is no "support the troops" about occupying a country and turning it into civil war. We will pay for this.

Help me get the word out.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ArkBuilders_org/
User avatar
directinfo
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat 05 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Moscow

Re: Is Iraq Just a Post-Oil Training Ground?

Unread postby zoidberg » Sun 26 Mar 2006, 02:10:14

LOL. Yep. Splitting a country along racial/sectarian lines and starting a civil war sounds like an excellent way to manage post peak chaos.

Good lord. I think some rationing along with central oversight to ensure that resources are allocated according to their long term utility instead of their short term profit is probably what most governments are preparing for. Iraq is the tail end of of long convoluted process that began with the industrial era. IMHO hardly the harbinger of things to come.

Peak Oil != Armageddon.
User avatar
zoidberg
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 635
Joined: Wed 23 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Center of north america

Re: Is Iraq Just a Post-Oil Training Ground?

Unread postby cynthia » Sun 26 Mar 2006, 02:28:49

There are no more excuses! Good, albeit difficult posting, directinfo. The US people have been insulated from much of this-at their peril.
People! please read Robert Fisk's (http://www.robert-fisk.com/) non-imbedded reportings from Iraq.
The hardest part is accepting how natural resource wars kill innocent people who get in the way of securing said resources.
Yet we muddle along with gold prices, natural gas depletions, bird flu and other intangible thoughts to avoid dealing with the absolute truth that our tax dollars are killing those unfortunate enough to live in an oil-bearing region.
I feel SICK.
cynthia
User avatar
cynthia
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 412
Joined: Sun 29 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Is Iraq Just a Post-Oil Training Ground?

Unread postby lutherquick » Sun 26 Mar 2006, 16:05:39

No worries folks, the US will fail, the US is failing...
The track record is a clear indication of the future...

There will be peace as the world slides down peak oil's down slope...
As long as American hegemony continues to inflate and fail, as long as America war machine continues to fail, as long as American foriegn policy continues to be so delusional... then America will fail to annex the world.

Time will tell, but my guess, is that Bush is as sure about American future as he is about wmd or peace in Iraq.
User avatar
lutherquick
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 529
Joined: Fri 04 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: NJ

Re: Is Iraq Just a Post-Oil Training Ground?

Unread postby Chocky » Sun 26 Mar 2006, 22:21:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'f')omenting racial strife towards an instigated civil war


Oh come on. You can't hang that on the Americans. Racial strife is found to some degree anywhere where you have more than one racial group. Civil wars are hardly uncommon either. Are the Americans responsible for all of them?
User avatar
Chocky
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 485
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: The Land of Do-As-You-Please
Top

Re: Is Iraq Just a Post-Oil Training Ground?

Unread postby directinfo » Mon 27 Mar 2006, 01:02:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Chocky', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'f')omenting racial strife towards an instigated civil war


Oh come on. You can't hang that on the Americans. Racial strife is found to some degree anywhere where you have more than one racial group. Civil wars are hardly uncommon either. Are the Americans responsible for all of them?


No, I didn't say that. But I believe that the US is clearlyl responsible for the civil war in Iraq, and many believe are also instigating the one in Iraq. Certainly the US has most to benefit from civil war if keeping oil is their goal using a small number of unpopular troops. Certaingly the US is structurally organized to secure the territory of Iraq amidst any civil war that just happens to come along.

The Middle East was the first target, America is next. Society in the US is being structured for civil war in the US. Notice that even the "opposing" party in the US can't say that illegal immigration is illegal? What other country functions like that?

Iraq is the training ground for how the US will handle their own homegrown civil war.

Why?

First of all, I don't know why. I just observe facts and indicators and listen to credible alternative (not mainstream) views.

The elites print our money and instigate boom-busts. This is happening again now. In the boom, they make money on debt. In busts, they make money on war. No big secret there. Both sides of every war in the 20th century were financed the these same people. By the way, the Bush cartel financed Hitler DURING the war. During... Get it? That is their game. Simple, really.

So here is the theory then...

Elites want the energy and the territory and the power. They have wargamed this out in thousands of different ways. The best outcome for them is controlled chaos. The worst outcome for them is a resource starved revolution or a peaceful sharing of depleting resources. The dieoff / dieback is coming with or without instigation and planning from government. The easiest way to instigate a dieoff BEFORE we use up the remaining resouces and BEFORE we tear down the carrying capacity of the earth is to follow the Iraq model. Divide and conquer, the oldest model of war strategy and the only way that a small number of elites can control the outcome of the war.

According to the indicators like the black ops bombing of mosques, and black ops Nick Berg beheading, and black ops car bombs, and black ops shooting of innocent civilians, civil war instigation seems to be the preferred method of controlling resources with 14 "permanent" hardened military bases and a hated foreign occupational force. When I say black ops above, I mean that a small criminal military force (black ops) do the bidding of higher ups by instigating civil war in a number of ways. The whole US governement is not to blame except for being blind. Black operations is as old as millitary strategy and it is the way to foment divide and conquer strategies. They are caught red handed a number of times doing all the stuff I mentioned above but then the press conveniently forgets and Americans forget too.

Anyway, the record of black ops civil war instigation from the US side is there for anyone to see. Black ops is part of the Iraq war record. The "why" is the only remaining question.
User avatar
directinfo
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Sat 05 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Moscow
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests