Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Fuel Cell Thread (merged)

Discussions of conventional and alternative energy production technologies.

Fuel Cell breakthrough: 1/10th the size

Postby DriveElectric » Fri 20 May 2005, 15:36:24

{Thread condensed and cleaned up by Tyler_JC. The flame war went tohttp://www.peakoil.com/fortopic8196.html. The tree farm stuff went to http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic8195.html}

It looks like there are still advances being made in fuel cells. Maybe we should reconsider the potential for fuel cells in the future. Most members of PO.com (including me) typically have written off fuel cells as not feasible. Perhaps they actually do have a place in the energy mix of the future.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/05/20/fuel ... index.html

Company claims fuel cell advance
Friday, May 20, 2005 Posted: 7:34 AM EDT (1134 GMT)

LONDON, England (Reuters) -- A small British technology company has claimed it is on the verge of unlocking the vast potential of fuel cells as a commercially viable source of green energy.

Cambridge-based CMR Fuel Cells said it had made a breakthrough with a new design of fuel cell that is a 10th of the size of existing models and small enough to replace conventional batteries in laptop computers.

"We firmly believe CMR technology is the equivalent of the jump from transistors to integrated circuits," said John Halfpenny, the firm's chief executive.

CMR said the new design would run for four times longer than conventional batteries in a laptop or other devices like power tools.

Evans said the design, which would run initially on methanol, was based on new type of fuel stack which mixed air and fuel. Up to now fuel stacks have relied on complete separation of the two.

(click on link for the rest of the article)
User avatar
DriveElectric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby big_rc » Fri 20 May 2005, 15:45:10

Fuel cells are wonderful things and this breakthrough will probably make the people who designed it alot of money if it works as well as planned but this will not rescue us by any means from the effects of peak oil. Think of small fuel cells (like this one) as battery replacement devices. For a number of reasons, (primarily economic), it makes very good sense to replace that cumbersome battery in your laptop and cell phone with a methanol fuel cell right now. Now when you talk about replacing an internal combustion engine with one of these, that is not going to happen for a very long time.
Simon's Law: Everything put together falls apart sooner or later.

I don't think of all the misery, but of all the beauty that still remains.--Anne Frank
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Postby DriveElectric » Fri 20 May 2005, 16:00:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('big_rc', ' ') Now when you talk about replacing an internal combustion engine with one of these, that is not going to happen for a very long time.


I think you missed the point. This is not about replacing the internal combustion engine and going forward as if there is no problem. This was an article about fuel cell technology making some key steps forward in size reduction and fuel stack design.

But when considering transporation applications with fuel cells, it does not take a full sized vehicle to make clever use of a fuel cell based on methanol. Vectrix has an electric scooter design which has a methanol fuel cell. The propulsion is still pure battery, but the fuel cell can be used to constantly trickle recharge the battery, whether you are riding or the scooter is parked. This trickle recharge has the effect of doubling the range. The fuel cell is not the primary source of power, instead it is a clever application to extend the range of the electric scooter.
User avatar
DriveElectric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby BiGG » Fri 20 May 2005, 16:10:04

I just don’t see how anybody can not be excited by fuel cells as they are our future and here already!

Ceres Power just patented a fuel cell that does not need platinum and can run on hydrogen!

Image

General Motors "Reinventing the Automobile with Fuel Cell Technology"

GM has made great strides in solving many of the challenges inherent in fuel cell technology, including the tendency to freeze and stop working in cold weather. The GM fuel cell's freeze start-up time has decreased to less than 15 seconds for 100% power at minus 20 degrees Celsius.

With its historic expertise in manufacturing and engineering, GM has taken a leadership position in fuel cell technology, systems, controls and gasoline/natural gas hydrogen fuel reforming.

GM's prototype stationary fuel cell unit already generates power for GM's New York fuel cell development facility.

In only two years, the power density of GM's fuel cell stack technology has increased tenfold, while costs have decreased proportionately.

GM's revolutionary fuel cell vehicle, Hy-wire, has no internal combustion engine, instrument panel, brake or accelerator pedals — but it does have ample power supplied by a GM fuel cell that runs on hydrogen.

Image

General Motors Fuel Cell Marathon across Europe

General Motors large scale power plants already running.

Honda is already building these and the link shows them being tested in cities already.

Image

Image

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Lots of pictures & information here.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby EddieB » Fri 20 May 2005, 16:22:15

My brother-in-law to be is currently working on his PhD in chemical catalysis, specifically related to fuel cells. He says there are still major hurdles to overcome before they will be a commercially viable technology. Not only is platnum limiting (sorry BiGG, I gotta go with his take on the platnum issue since he works with it all the time), but also there are major problems with membrane contamination (the site of the reaction between H2 and O2 or CH3OH and O2). Fuels must be made EXTREMELY clean in order for the cells to run for any length of time. Really really clean fuels have low EROEI because of extra distillations/refining. They're at least 20 years from being really viable, and that assumes some of the hurdles can be overcome...
User avatar
EddieB
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: BA PA USA

Postby DriveElectric » Fri 20 May 2005, 16:32:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EddieB', ' ')but also there are major problems with membrane contamination (the site of the reaction between H2 and O2 or CH3OH and O2). Fuels must be made EXTREMELY clean in order for the cells to run for any length of time. Really really clean fuels have low EROEI because of extra distillations/refining. They're at least 20 years from being really viable, and that assumes some of the hurdles can be overcome...


I'm not sure if this is what the article was referring to, but it sounds like they are saying that they have overcome the membrane issue with a new design that mixes the air and fuel.

"Evans said the design, which would run initially on methanol, was based on new type of fuel stack which mixed air and fuel. Up to now fuel stacks have relied on complete separation of the two. "
User avatar
DriveElectric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Sat 12 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby BiGG » Fri 20 May 2005, 16:40:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('EddieB', 'M')y brother-in-law to be is currently working on his PhD in chemical catalysis, specifically related to fuel cells. He says there are still major hurdles to overcome before they will be a commercially viable technology. Not only is platnum limiting (sorry BiGG, I gotta go with his take on the platnum issue since he works with it all the time)....



No offence intended towards your brother but what does he know about Ceres Power and their technology being a student? Does he have any knowledge regarding this company? They clearly say they have a working model not requiring platinum and recently hosted a delegation from around the world showing it off!
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby big_rc » Fri 20 May 2005, 17:08:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DriveElectric', '
')
I think you missed the point. This is not about replacing the internal combustion engine and going forward as if there is no problem. This was an article about fuel cell technology making some key steps forward in size reduction and fuel stack design.


I agree that this is a significant finding with regards to fuel cell design and I would readily invest my money in this company if the fuel cell works as advertised. My issue is this is a battery replacement only. Nothing more, nothing less. I still think its pretty neat and a great idea.
Simon's Law: Everything put together falls apart sooner or later.

I don't think of all the misery, but of all the beauty that still remains.--Anne Frank
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Postby big_rc » Fri 20 May 2005, 17:12:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BiGG', '
')No offence intended towards your brother but what does he know about Ceres Power and their technology being a student? Does he have any knowledge regarding this company? They clearly say they have a working model not requiring platinum and recently hosted a delegation from around the world showing it off!


Bigg,

Do you honestly know what you are talking about? There are a number of catalysts that can be used but platinum is BY FAR the best. Just because this company has a "working model" means absolutely nothing. Quit parroting every single piece of news you here about before anaylzing the situation in total.
Simon's Law: Everything put together falls apart sooner or later.

I don't think of all the misery, but of all the beauty that still remains.--Anne Frank
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)
Top

Postby Devil » Sat 21 May 2005, 03:17:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BiGG', '[')b]I just don’t see how anybody can not be excited by fuel cells as they are our future and here already!


With every post you make, you just display ignorance and naivety. Fuel cells have been discussed ad nauseam on this forum and their advantages and disadvantages debated many times by people who have a helluva sight more knowledge in their little fingers than you appear to have within your cranium. I'll not repeat why you are so utterly wrong.

The following are two posts made in another forum, which respond well to the OP in this thread:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ight, methanol is an insidious and dangerous cumulative toxin which
will destroy brain cells, with an initial predilection for the optic
nerve. It can be absorbed by ingestion, inhalation of the vapours or
through the skin (it is the fastest liquid for dermal uptake). It also
has a flash point of 12°C and explosive limits of between 6% and 36% in
air. You would need 99.9% pure methanol for fuel cell needs and this is
expensive and impossible to buy in some countries due to its toxicity
(special licence issued only to qualified chemists.

I extract from the J.T. Baker MSDS:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')mergency Overview
--------------------------
POISON! DANGER! VAPOR HARMFUL. MAY BE FATAL OR CAUSE BLINDNESS IF
SWALLOWED. HARMFUL IF INHALED OR ABSORBED THROUGH SKIN. CANNOT BE MADE
NONPOISONOUS. FLAMMABLE LIQUID AND VAPOR. CAUSES IRRITATION TO SKIN,
EYES AND RESPIRATORY TRACT. AFFECTS CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM AND LIVER.

SAF-T-DATA(tm) Ratings (Provided here for your convenience)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Health Rating: 3 - Severe (Poison)
Flammability Rating: 3 - Severe (Flammable)
Reactivity Rating: 1 - Slight
Contact Rating: 3 - Severe (Life)
Lab Protective Equip: GOGGLES & SHIELD; LAB COAT & APRON; VENT HOOD;
PROPER GLOVES; CLASS B EXTINGUISHER
Storage Color Code: Red (Flammable)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Potential Health Effects
----------------------------------

Inhalation:
A slight irritant to the mucous membranes. Toxic effects exerted upon
nervous system, particularly the optic nerve. Once absorbed into the
body, it is very slowly eliminated. Symptoms of overexposure may include
headache, drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, blurred vision, blindness, coma,
and death. A person may get better but then worse again up to 30 hours
later.
Ingestion:
Toxic. Symptoms parallel inhalation. Can intoxicate and cause blindness.
Usual fatal dose: 100-125 milliliters.
Skin Contact:
Methyl alcohol is a defatting agent and may cause skin to become dry and
cracked. Skin absorption can occur; symptoms may parallel inhalation
exposure.
Eye Contact:
Irritant. Continued exposure may cause eye lesions.
Chronic Exposure:
Marked impairment of vision has been reported. Repeated or prolonged
exposure may cause skin irritation.
Aggravation of Pre-existing Conditions:
Persons with pre-existing skin disorders or eye problems or impaired
liver or kidney function may be more susceptible to the effects of the
substance.


I wonder what the IATA would say about it as being taken on a plane or
used on one:
IATA PSN Code: QHQ
IATA UN ID Number: 1230
IATA Proper Shipping Name: METHANOL
IATA UN Class: 3
IATA Subsidiary Risk Class: 6.1
IATA Label: FLAMMABLE LIQUID
IATA CLASS:SUBSIDARY HAZARD CLASS IS POISONOUS SUBSTANCE.

Normally, this lot means that it can be carried only on cargo planes
(not passenger) and in special containers.

And then the security guys at the airports may baulk at a liquid which,
if shaken up in a container, may create an explosive mix of air and vapours.

Do you really think that this is where the future lies?


As a reply to this, another guy said that he can buy methanol in any US hardware store, which elicited the following response:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') doubt whether methanol bought thuswise would be pure enough for a fuel
cell. Anyway, knowing how litigious the USA is, I'm surprised that
anyone would dare sell it. Spill just one litre of the stuff and you
have to file a Toxics Release Inventory for it. Under Section 313 of the
Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act of 1986, releases of
more than one pound of methanol into the air, water, and land must be
reported annually and entered into the Toxic Release Inventory (TRI).
OSHA has issued permissible exposure limits for methanol. Methanol is
regulated by the EPA as a water priority pollutant, an air toxic on the
Hazardous Air Pollutant List, and a volatile organic compound. It really
is nasty stuff.

You've heard the expression 'blind drunk'. This came about because some
poorly distilled gin had stalks as well as the berries from the juniper
plant in the mash. This produced a gin with a tiny quantity of methanol
and one binge would make the imbiber blind.

Anyway, I'm damned if I would have anything powered by a methanol fuel
cell - too bloody dangerous.
Devil
User avatar
Devil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cyprus
Top

Postby BiGG » Sat 21 May 2005, 06:57:10

Devil,

Ummm sweetie? Isn’t it interesting all those here with these alleged giant brains keep posting the most ridiculous ignorant crap that little ol’ me has debunked with facts repeatedly! Did you notice how many supposedly knowledgeable people were claiming Ethanol is a net energy loser right here alone yesterday and how my little brain humiliated them with facts showing otherwise? Did you also notice at least two points regarding fuel cells in this thread that you self-proclaimed experts had zero clue about no matter how many times you debated it in the past?

And your ridiculous list of warnings above can be found on many existing products like how about you produce a list of similar warnings for even very old products like maybe ether, gasoline, & battery acid!

You sit around with your list of self-proclaimed experts and debate things like the merits of horses over the horseless carriage all you want, but don’t mind those of us discussing the merits of cutting edge carriages, especially when we keep showing your thinking to be as antiquated as Greek mythology.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Devil » Sat 21 May 2005, 12:02:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BiGG', '
')And your ridiculous list of warnings above can be found on many existing products like how about you produce a list of similar warnings for even very old products like maybe ether, gasoline, & battery acid!


Ah! My sincere apologies to you as an expert in toxicology and epidemiology. The post-grad course I took in industrial toxicology at the University of Neuchâtel in Switzerland, in conjunction with the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, obviously counts for nothing compared with your superior knowledge, which is clearly better than that of the J.T. Baker company, a leading supplier of analytical chemicals whom you qualify as "ridiculous".

I grovel before your outstanding awareness of the metabolic processes which equate methanol with ether, gasoline and battery acid.
Devil
User avatar
Devil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 816
Joined: Tue 06 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Cyprus
Top

Postby BiGG » Sat 21 May 2005, 12:50:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Devil', '
')
Ah! My sincere apologies to you as an expert in toxicology and epidemiology. The post-grad course I took in industrial toxicology at the University of Neuchâtel in Switzerland, in conjunction with the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, obviously counts for nothing compared with your superior knowledge, which is clearly better than that of the J.T. Baker company, a leading supplier of analytical chemicals whom you qualify as "ridiculous".

I grovel before your outstanding awareness of the metabolic processes which equate methanol with ether, gasoline and battery acid.


You sincere apology is accepted! Now, can you reread my post and see where I never said anything about the J .T. Baker Company being ridiculous and where I said the list of warnings you posted were ridiculous because similar ones can be found on many existing products also that are easily available and used daily around the planet. In other words your list of warnings were a big yawn!

BTW: All of that “ignorance” I was displaying in my post was coming from the knowledgeable scientists from around the world like Ceres Power, General Motors, Honda, & the United States Department of Energy so pardon me if I’m just not impressed the one class you took in industrial toxicology in the future anymore than I am now. In a nutshell, your credentials are another big yawn so I will stick with the opinions of those that actually have some and work in this field.
"The Stone Age did not end for lack of stone, and the Oil Age will end long before the world runs out of oil" ............ Former Saudi Arabian oil minister Sheikh Zaki Yamani,
User avatar
BiGG
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon 28 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Postby 0mar » Sat 21 May 2005, 13:18:28

BiGG, what exactly is your background?

Methanol is derived from methane or crude oil. Hydrogen is derived primarily from coal/methane/oil in one way or another.

You probably scoff at plutonium's warning labels too.
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Postby MonteQuest » Sat 21 May 2005, 13:23:57

Ya know, BiGG, I thought it was just me, but after seeing you try to trash Devil, (one of our most knowledgeable and reasoned members) I'll have it on record that you display the epitome of gross ignorance, and are just nothing short of a fool. Talk about burning every bridge of credibility. :lol:

I think you believe everything you read that supports your agenda and parrot it as fact. 8O You don't seem to like having your feet held to the fire. Maybe one day you will enter into the realm of acceptable scientific criteria, for it seems you have your own "proof" meter and I think it needs a new battery or calibration. 8)
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Postby Raxozanne » Sun 22 May 2005, 08:38:37

From my own *joe public* perspective I think these fuel cells are a good idea but household electricity generation is only one thing.
What about transportation, what about factories? What about farming?
Would these be able to be applied there too? We will just have to wait and see. But if these are supplied from biomass then I think their application will be limited. Plus millions of them would have to be manufactured.
Hello, my name is Rax. I live in the Amazon jungle with a bunch of women. We are super eco feminists and our favourite passtimes are dangling men by their ankles and discussing peak oil. - apparently
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Postby big_rc » Sun 22 May 2005, 18:41:18

OK everyone here has gotten completely off topic. This methanol fuel cell is a small fuel cell which is designed to power small stuff like laptops and cell phones. That's all folks. This small fuel cell will not be used for medium to large scale electrical generation and definetly not for transportation. There is nothing earth shaking here folks so let's all get along.
Simon's Law: Everything put together falls apart sooner or later.

I don't think of all the misery, but of all the beauty that still remains.--Anne Frank
User avatar
big_rc
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat 17 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Amerika (most of the time)

Postby Tyler_JC » Sun 22 May 2005, 23:06:59

Stock Chart for Ceres Power

Do you mean to tell me that Ceres Power (the company that is about to save the world) can't impress it's share holders? It's stock has fallen by more than 20% since it was first issued. This shows a lack of confidence in its ability to make a profit (which it has yet to do, btw). If Ceres Power had the ability to make cheap useful fuel cells, the wealthy/educated/informed investor would jump at the chance to own a piece of the action, right? RIGHT???
"www.peakoil.com is the Myspace of the Apocalypse."
Tyler_JC
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5438
Joined: Sat 25 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Boston, MA

Postby MonteQuest » Sun 22 May 2005, 23:46:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', '[')url=http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=CWR.L&t=6m]Stock Chart for Ceres Power[/url]

Do you mean to tell me that Ceres Power (the company that is about to save the world) can't impress it's share holders? It's stock has fallen by more than 20% since it was first issued. This shows a lack of confidence in its ability to make a profit (which it has yet to do, btw). If Ceres Power had the ability to make cheap useful fuel cells, the wealthy/educated/informed investor would jump at the chance to own a piece of the action, right? RIGHT???


Fuel cell companies across the board are, or are nearly, penny stocks. Investors are not putting their money behind this technology.

Ballard Power #1 fuel cell company 3.50/share
Plug Power 5.69
Millenium Cell 1.38
Fuel Cell 7.19
Manhattan Tech .05
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Postby Cyrus » Mon 23 May 2005, 11:00:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ine Critical Questions to Ask About Alternative Energy
Quote:
May 27, 2003, 1400 PDT (FTW) -- Before we instantly accept alternative energy lifeboats that will let us keep our current lifestyles, don't you think it wise to see if they float?

Here are nine questions that you must ask of yourself, and anyone who claims that they have found a perfect alternative to oil. After answering these questions, you may have a better idea about whether you want to jump (or throw your family) into something that might sink in short order.

Deluding yourself that the energy problem has been solved only guarantees that the crisis will hit you and the planet much harder in the end.

The end of the Age of Oil is a life and death game. Can you afford to be cavalier about it? Do not think of prudent, but ultimately temporary, steps that should be taken to soften the blow as solutions.

These questions have been arranged by order of importance and by the order in which they will enable you to quickly evaluate an alternative energy source. If you can't get the right answer to the first one, you need not go any further.

After answering all nine questions, you will see - from a scientific place, rather than an emotional one - that there is no effective replacement for what hydrocarbon energy provides today.

Quote:
Any alternative energy source claiming to be a solution to the coming oil and gas shortages must have documented “open book” EROEI policies. If it doesn't, then it has something to hide.


Link to the 9 questions

http://www.peakoil.com/fortopic8127.html
User avatar
Cyrus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 25 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Energy Technology

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron