by TorrKing » Mon 30 Jan 2006, 06:43:28
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Itch', 'H')ey, Torjus.
I guess our respective environmental conditions might make a difference in our fishing experiences. I somehow get the idea that the weather in Norway is maybe a bit different than the Pacific Northwest in the US.
But, you know, I did just get a pack of these automatic fishing reels. You put a hook and bait on, set the line to the desired length, and secure it in a notch. The fish bites the bait, tugs on the line, and unleashes the mechanism that secures the line, automatically reeling the fish in. I can't wait to try these out.
I have the same ideas about setting up multiple fish traps. For narrow places like creeks, you could have a long stick, with the bait and hook, hanging out over the water, supported by whatever is available.
In lakes and larger bodies of water, attaching a bait-bound stick to a line that is connected to the shore, and then pushing the armed stick out towards the deeper parts is more appropriate, if you are going for larger fish that is.
I think traps would be most appropriate for catfish and other fish with the same eating habits, where they basically eat anything on the floor that can be eaten. Actually, it's probably better for all bigger fish in general. But with small panfish, I've walked up to the shoreline, dropped the hook in the water, and pulled out a juicy bluegill out within seconds using a pole. At that rate I'd be able to catch a whole meal and surplus oil within minutes.
Nets and poles both have their uses for the appropriate fishing conditions. If net works in your area where poles fail, then I hope your net catch is bountiful, and hopefully legal; it isn't fun being fined for trying to eat relatively untainted food. Nets are very illegal where I live, and the risk for setting them up would be great. With an improvised pole, I don't have to worry about getting fucked with. And even if I'm fishing in the cleanest areas, where it is illegal to fish, of course, I can toss the pole in the water or bushes and sprint off, without losing a valuable tool behind. In my case, I'd rather use a net to make a ghillie suit, so the bad guys won't see me in the first place.
I guess the ideal thing for me would be to deploy traps in various areas, while I go back and pole fihs for my enjoyment. I think it's a good exercise for range estimation and hand-eye coordination. I catch what is needed using a pole, and maybe check the traps over the next few days to see if anything bit. The fish would be alive for quite sometime, since it would just be sitting there with a hook in its mouth. It might be depressing for the fish, though, spending all that time thinking about such a huge mistake.
The conditions are pretty similar here and in North-Western US I believe. Traps is very good in salmon and trout spawning runs.
And you are right, when fishing small fish it is probably better to use a line and hook. Otherwise one need very small meshes in the nets to catch them. And making small-meshed nets is alot of work.
Little pollution where I come from and netfishing is legal in all lakes. We could make a living out of it if we had to. But nobody cares anymore. When the going gets bad, I think that will change.
When law and order break down at your place it could be advantageous to have a net laying around, don't you think?
Torjus Gaaren