by FreakOil » Mon 14 Jan 2008, 07:37:27
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('culicomorpha', 'i')s some interesting research on female mice that shows something relevant to this topic. It turns out that when things are good, when food is plentiful and conditions are easy, the "pretty daughters" do very well, getting the best mates and first access to food, etc. But when things get bad, the "ugly daughters" who are stronger and who can deal with adversity, do much better and so it is a kind of reversal of fate.
I have to think that there is a parallel to humans. Since I have never depended upon my looks for survival, I think I'll do quite well, and so if it's sick to feel some schadefreude at the coming meltdown, so be it.
This reminded me of an article I read in the New York Times a while back about Korean men finding wives abroad through agencies. A Korean farmer went to Vietnam and looked over the available girls, and their must of been some hot items willing to leave their impoverished homes and move to Korea. The farmer chose a plain, stout woman to help out on the farm. There was a picture of the couple along with the article.
Where I live, men, in general, prefer women who I would describe as useless or ineffectual. The ideal woman is thin to the point of malnutrition, as if a strong breeze could blow her over. White skin is also considered very attractive. In times past, it showed that you were noble and didn't work out in the sun like a peasant. It's sad that uselessness has become a standard of beauty.
I'm like Sneider, I guess. I like a woman with a bit of meat on her bones, though not fat.