Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

The air car

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

The air car

Postby SD_Scott » Thu 21 Jul 2005, 18:09:31

Check this out. Don't know if it's a real solution or not but it's brilliant.

http://www.motordeaire.com/ing/UKPressrelease.html
User avatar
SD_Scott
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu 09 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Around somewhere

Postby Cyrus » Thu 21 Jul 2005, 18:13:24

Discussed here.
User avatar
Cyrus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue 25 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Postby Sys1 » Thu 21 Jul 2005, 18:32:06

One second, i thought it was a flying car :)
User avatar
Sys1
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 983
Joined: Fri 25 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: The air car

Postby BabyPeanut » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 08:32:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SD_Scott', 'C')heck this out. Don't know if it's a real solution or not but it's brilliant.

http://www.motordeaire.com/ing/UKPressrelease.html


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow does it work?

90m3 of compressed air is stored in fibre tanks.
Just don't ask how that compressed air got into the tank. :lol:
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Postby Battle_Scarred_Galactico » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 09:01:46

I was expecting the flying one, oh well.

(As rediculous as it is the flying car is pretty cool)
---
Battle_Scarred_Galactico
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 935
Joined: Thu 07 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 14:26:48

I've been watching the air car for about three years now. The air gets into the tank via compressor. they say that until fuelling stations are built (cause they may not be economical since air is a lot cheaper than selling gas for the retailers) that you could use dive shops.

They have a couple of cars that have apparently been doing road test for a couple of years (there are a couple of taxis for example). most critics say that they don't go as far or as fast as they claim. there still isn't enough action by possible investors to bring it mainstream. which sucks cause its such a great idea.
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Postby BabyPeanut » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 15:19:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', 'T')he air gets into the tank via compressor.
And the compressor does this how exactly?

Well a motor...

And the motor uses what? Say it: energy from _____.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Postby uNkNowN ElEmEnt » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 15:37:07

Ok smartypants, I see your point now. :razz:
User avatar
uNkNowN ElEmEnt
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2587
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: perpetual state of exhaustion

Postby BabyPeanut » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 16:19:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('uNkNowN ElEmEnt', 'O')k smartypants, I see your point now. :razz:
Now if only the person who wrote the press release would 'fess up to it too.

http://www.motordeaire.com/ing/UKPressrelease.html
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')uy Nègre has invented a "zero pollution" car which involves no combustion.
Plus the last thing I would expect to read in a press release is any real statistics about how much energy it really takes.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he MDI car can reach a speed of 68 mph and has a road coverage of roughly 124 miles -some 8 hours of travel- which is more than double the road coverage of an electric car. When recharging the tank, the car needs to be connected to the mains (220V) for 3 to 4 hours or attached to an air pump in a petrol station for only 2 minutes.

Economy and the ecological benefits are the main advantages for the client since the car´s maintenance cost is 10 times less than that of a petrol-run car, costing 1 pound for the car to travel for up to 8 hours or to cover 124 miles in an Urban area.
So many facts. Would it have killed them to put the kWh it consumes to charge from A/C?
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts
Top

Postby muhandis » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:34:42

Sorry, it is not as it appears. I checked with some experts at the Federal government when we were evaluating the technology, and although the motor works and is functional, there are severe problems with its range if running only on compressed air (I believe that it doesn't have the claimed range).

The hybird version might make more sense. Cool concept though, I hope they get more of the bugs out.

I haven't checked back for about a year now on what is happening with the concept. There is a video clip on Radio-Canada Découverte back about 2002 on the car.

www.mdi.lu
User avatar
muhandis
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon 12 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: British Columbia, Canada

Postby BabyPeanut » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:39:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('muhandis', 'T')he hybird version might make more sense.
More sense to whom? How am I supposed to believe it makes more sense to burn fossil fuels at a power station, then waste some of the energy by sending it down wires made of aluminum to homes so that it can charge a car's air tank while it competes for power on an already overloaded electrical grid?

This only makes sense if you ignore reality. Reality isn't about electric powered cars, it's about the poor people having their airconditioners turned off on the hottest days:
link
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'P')osted on Fri, Jul. 22, 2005

Edison shut off power to more than 155,000 residential air conditioners under a program that offers people reduced rates if they agree to power cuts when demand gets high, Edison spokesman Gil Alexander said.
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts
Top

Postby pilferage » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:43:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BabyPeanut', 'A')nd the motor uses what? Say it: energy from _____.


Ohhhh... I know. Fission! :P

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BabyPeanut', 'S')o many facts. Would it have killed them to put the kWh it consumes to charge from A/C?


Eh... that's where the design lives or dies. The most inefficient compressors are in the %10-15 range. So right there we're in ICE powered automobile territory. However that's the most inefficient, and I doubt we'll use those. Not only that, but if this was adopted we'd mostly likely see increases in efficiency of A/C's. Something else to consider, these are really, really cheap to make, and chances are electricity will very very abundant in the future (fission).
It should only take ~1,000 plants producing 1000mw's each to compensate for the oil based energy we use in private transportation.
The air car would possibly drop this since (due to it's design) it must be as efficient as possible.
Last edited by pilferage on Fri 22 Jul 2005, 17:51:15, edited 1 time in total.
"Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. "
User avatar
pilferage
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun 21 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: ~170ft/lbs@0rpm (on my bike)
Top

Postby BabyPeanut » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 18:01:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pilferage', 'T')he most inefficient compressors are in the %10-15 range.
Is that total energy efficiency or do you have to ignore the issues of electrical power generation and transmission in order to see that much efficiency?

For example electricity from coal:
1. coal mining
2. coal transporation
3. coal crushing, inserting into furnace, cleaning out clinkers, etc.
4. power generation, loss from heat escaping rather than driving turbines
5. power transmission, loss from resistance

Then you can tack on the inefficiencies of the air compressor.

Image
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts
Top

Postby turmoil » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 19:15:57

I guess the 'Other, 0.2%' must be mice running on a treadmill.
"If you are a real seeker after truth, it's necessary that at least once in your life you doubt all things as far as possible"-Rene Descartes

"When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains however improbable must be the truth"-Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
turmoil
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1088
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Richmond, VA, Pale Blue Dot

Postby pilferage » Fri 22 Jul 2005, 21:04:29

If we're talking about the air car then lets be realistic. It's designed in France and will probably sell first in France. They produce 415 bkwh from nuclear (I believe this includes transmission losses, but I'm not sure), and export a significant portion of that (not sure how much exactly).

We know pressure=energy/volume, so the energy used to take the car ~150 miles is (350bars)*(400l)= (101325(350)N/M^2)*(.4)m^3= 14185500N*m or Joules. Now at 10% A/C efficiency, an aircar uses 141855000J per 150 miles. Assuming the average citizen of France drives 20 miles per day, they would use 6903610000J per year (150/20=7.5 days per fill, 365/7.5=48.7 fills per year, 48.7*141855000=6903610000J per year), or 1917kwh per year (6903610000/(60min*60s)=1917669w/hy=1917kw/hy). Assuming 25,000,000 air cars, this works out to an additional ~48 bkwh per year. Which could be covered by the construction of an additional 7 nuclear power plants. An A/C with 20% efficiency would cut this in half.

We are inefficient little bastards, and this kind of waste is rampant throughout our system (especially here in America). After a bit of pondering I think peak oil isn't as much about lack of energy as it is about those who have the most power (auto/oil industry), still having the most power after this transition.

A 2kw solar panel system will provide ~2700kwh per year and cost ~$20k. This leaves you with 800kwh per year extra. The cost of the car is ~10k...
So for 30k you could be able to drive almost 7500 miles per year, cut you electricity bill significantly for at least two decades. Fission is much cheaper than solar. As a matter of opinion, I'd say fission is so cheap that it scared the shit out of the oil/auto industry... enough to result in it's blacklisting until a time when it was needed. :twisted:

Edit- For the sake of argument, in the U.S. (30 mile average per day, ~203 million cars) we'd need and additional 585bkwh per year. Which is somewhere in the neighborhood of 80 more reactors? This is why we're seeing this push towards clean coal. It's the only substance we have that could provide the increase in load needed while these fission plants are being contructed.
"Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. "
User avatar
pilferage
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 553
Joined: Sun 21 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: ~170ft/lbs@0rpm (on my bike)


Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron