by ralfy » Wed 02 Nov 2011, 23:48:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Bruce_S', '
')
Yes, but you were ridiculed and disrespected by Pstarr. There was the chance you, as a single industry person, are simply out of the loop, off your rocker, or a rogue. But when a second industry insider validates your position, well, that changes everything.
I don't know who is an "industry person" or "insider" in this thread, but I'd like to see any reports or studies they made about the matter, especially those that prefer "economics" to "EROEI." I'd like to add, too, that referring to the bpd, which is mentioned by the OP, is one of those "bean counter" methods connected to EROEI.
GIven that, I don't see any "validation" of the matter. In which case, phrases like "that changes everything" is more like irrelevant drama queen statements to me.
Perhaps this might help:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/175771- ... -shale-oilIt doesn't necessarily raise claims that continued production is unsustainable, but it puts into question references to "total recoverable resources." This, plus the two other sources I gave, and the academic studies mentioned in another forum, should give us a clearer picture of the situation.
At least that's a lot better than just insisting that as long as one gets his money then there's nothing to question.