by Heineken » Sun 26 Nov 2006, 14:38:25
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lateStarter', '
')Actually, I don't think they will be using cruise-missiles or laser-guided bunker busters to maintain order in the US. There is no doubt that the US military has some fine hardware to play with. The problem, as exposed in Iraq and elsewhere, is that they are not prepared to fight a prolonged, low-level, low-tech type of warfare which seems to be the norm in most of the world today. It would almost be better for the US, if someone would step up to the plate and fight them at the same level. I really don't think the US military would be any more successful keeping the peace at home than they are any place else.
I have high regards for the US military. My father was in the USAF for 24 years. I feel for many years, they have been forced to fight with one hand behind their back though because of having people like Rumsfield at the wheel.
Vietnam and Iraq (and 9/11) are proof that America's weaponry is something of a paper tiger. So I agree with you.
I also share your feelings about the US military, and am myself a veteran and the son of a decorated and severely disabled one.
I have to chuckle when I get attacked for lack of patriotism.
In fact, I have high regard for ANY military. It takes guts to put your ass on the line. The problem, of course, is that the military is a tool of politicians, who generally misuse it.