Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Striking the US where it hurts

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby rogerhb » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 00:02:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wowpleasewakeupalready', 'W')hy would the US bomb a pipeline? Seems so inefficient to me. I say take out the refineries they are connected to first.


Another armchair general I see.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby erl » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 00:21:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', 'A')nother armchair general I see.


You must recognize a kindred spirit there, eh Roger?
erl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby rogerhb » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 00:24:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('erl', 'Y')ou must recognize a kindred spirit there, eh Roger?


I don't have an armchair.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Concerned » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 01:08:01

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Depends. If the pipeline is on the surface, very easy. If it is buried 20 m or more in the ground not so easy. Not only would you need a bomb that can blast 20 m into the ground, you would have to know exactly where the pipe route was.


Why would the US bomb a pipeline? Seems so inefficient to me. I say take out the refineries they are connected to first.

Lemme guess, China is burying their refineries too?

And the debate gets even sillier...................


It would still be more energy efficient to fix a pipeline than bury it, so I don't see pipelines being buried any time soon. Not unless they hit major built up areas.

Destroying a refinery is no mean feat. Then destroying many refineries is an even greater challenge. Rebuilding and or running on partial capacity is also a possibility. Not to mention your enemy is not going to lay around and watch his infrastructure crumble if he can strike back. Which is always a problem when picking on someone who can actually hurt you back.

By the time you get to the stage of bombing Chinese refinery capacity I think you're pretty much down the road to full blow hostilities including nuclear exchange, lose a few carriers, collapse of economy and our easy motoring high consumption lifestlye.

Targetted pipeline destruction by US supported groups would be an option to disrupt supply. Probably low intensity conflict in the lead up to larger hostilities or perhaps a longer drawn out process.
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Shadizar » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 04:26:54

Wonderfull analysis. One of the best I've seen from this group (in about a year and a half).

-Shadizar

P.S. OUTSTANDING!
User avatar
Shadizar
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun 24 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby garyp » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 06:48:26

Everyone is focusing on throwing weapons around, but those types of behaviour play into the US mindset of main force, and thus invite retaliation.

Concentrate on the economic weapon. That's the one that can be unleashed without any comeback. For quite believable export reasons the countries of the far east have built up a position where they control the fate of the US currency. They also control its manufacturing base. They can control the moment they choose to unleash this weapon, and thus one way or another the US will do as they say.

And all without having to fire missiles at anywhere.

Bringing it back to peak oil, there is one very good way to postpone the peak and deliver China the oil it needs at a price it can control. Reduce the US oil consumption dramatically. For the sake of argument, if you halved the US consumption supply and demand would balance for at least another ten years. I'd guess that someone in China has that one worked out already.
User avatar
garyp
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue 18 Apr 2006, 03:00:00

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Heineken » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 10:07:11

wowplease, as a love it or leave it type, is right to be proud of America's weaponry. Because that's about all America has left. The dollar is backed by bombs and little else. Certainly not by trust, prestige, gold, savings, or a manufacturing base. All gone.

As the US Empire continues to crumble, it will continue to lash out in its death throes. As in Iraq, with the potential for much worse.

You talk about danger.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby smallpoxgirl » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 10:22:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('wowpleasewakeupalready', 'D')on't let your hate for the US impact your objectivity. If you stay objective you will realise the world needs the US much more than it needs them.
I guess I don't see it that way. To me it's more like a drunk in a bar waving a pistol. It's not so much that you need them, but you need to keep them calm. If they freak out, a whole bunch of people are gonna die.
"We were standing on the edges
Of a thousand burning bridges
Sifting through the ashes every day
What we thought would never end
Now is nothing more than a memory
The way things were before
I lost my way" - OCMS
User avatar
smallpoxgirl
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7258
Joined: Mon 08 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Pfish » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 12:09:42

Just quit shipping to Walmart. That would do it. No need for nukes.
"If what we had was a dog and pony show what we have now is a canine-equestrian extravaganza"
User avatar
Pfish
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon 03 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Leucadia in the summer and Baja in the winter

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Euric » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 12:22:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'w')owplease, as a love it or leave it type, is right to be proud of America's weaponry. Because that's about all America has left. The dollar is backed by bombs and little else. Certainly not by trust, prestige, gold, savings, or a manufacturing base. All gone.

As the US Empire continues to crumble, it will continue to lash out in its death throes. As in Iraq, with the potential for much worse.

You talk about danger.


Those fabulous American weapons are going to come in very handy soon. When the US military's sole purpose will be to maintain law and order against its own citizens after the chaos of a dollar collapse.

They will be guarding shops to prevent looting, soup kitchen lines to prevent fights, banks to prevent robberies, and to transport law breakers and criminals to concentration camps. They will also be needed to guard petrol stations, refineries, power stations and substations and a whole list of areas that would be vulnerable to rebel citizen attacks.
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby lateStarter » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 13:04:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Euric', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'w')owplease, as a love it or leave it type, is right to be proud of America's weaponry. Because that's about all America has left. The dollar is backed by bombs and little else. Certainly not by trust, prestige, gold, savings, or a manufacturing base. All gone.

As the US Empire continues to crumble, it will continue to lash out in its death throes. As in Iraq, with the potential for much worse.

You talk about danger.


Those fabulous American weapons are going to come in very handy soon. When the US military's sole purpose will be to maintain law and order against its own citizens after the chaos of a dollar collapse.

They will be guarding shops to prevent looting, soup kitchen lines to prevent fights, banks to prevent robberies, and to transport law breakers and criminals to concentration camps. They will also be needed to guard petrol stations, refineries, power stations and substations and a whole list of areas that would be vulnerable to rebel citizen attacks.


Actually, I don't think they will be using cruise-missiles or laser-guided bunker busters to maintain order in the US. There is no doubt that the US military has some fine hardware to play with. The problem, as exposed in Iraq and elsewhere, is that they are not prepared to fight a prolonged, low-level, low-tech type of warfare which seems to be the norm in most of the world today. It would almost be better for the US, if someone would step up to the plate and fight them at the same level. I really don't think the US military would be any more successful keeping the peace at home than they are any place else.

I have high regards for the US military. My father was in the USAF for 24 years. I feel for many years, they have been forced to fight with one hand behind their back though because of having people like Rumsfield at the wheel.
We have been brought into the present condition in which we are unable neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them. - Livy
User avatar
lateStarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 38 km west of Warsaw, Poland
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Euric » Sat 25 Nov 2006, 14:07:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lateStarter', '[')
Actually, I don't think they will be using cruise-missiles or laser-guided bunker busters to maintain order in the US. There is no doubt that the US military has some fine hardware to play with. The problem, as exposed in Iraq and elsewhere, is that they are not prepared to fight a prolonged, low-level, low-tech type of warfare which seems to be the norm in most of the world today. It would almost be better for the US, if someone would step up to the plate and fight them at the same level. I really don't think the US military would be any more successful keeping the peace at home than they are any place else.


You never know.

If there were others willing to fight the US on the same level it would quickly spell the end for both sides. US cities would be bombed to dust and what remains would be a wasteland. I think the US knows this and would avoid any type of warfare that would result in a destruction of the US, at least by outside forces.
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby mekrob » Sun 26 Nov 2006, 11:34:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')oncentrate on the economic weapon


If they drop the dollar, they drop their own economy. Who's gonna buy their crap if the US can't?

It's best to wait until the drunk (US) passes out (suffers from PO) slowly (relative to economic or military warfare). Then you can just gang up on him, steal his wallet and clothes and tie his hands behind his back before he wakes up (if ever). Don't provoke the drunk, lest you wind up getting shot or stabbed by the asshole.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'F')or the sake of argument, if you halved the US consumption supply and demand would balance for at least another ten years.


China has what? 1.2-1.4 billion people? They have a very large nation, but they are suffering from climate change and some bad farming tactics, so are they able to produce all the food they need? Could they really afford to burn the food truck that is the US?
I want to put out the fires of Hell, and burn down the rewards of Paradise. They block the way to God. I do not want to worship from fear of punishment or for the promise of reward, but simply for the love of God. - Rabia
mekrob
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2408
Joined: Fri 09 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Heineken » Sun 26 Nov 2006, 14:38:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lateStarter', '
')Actually, I don't think they will be using cruise-missiles or laser-guided bunker busters to maintain order in the US. There is no doubt that the US military has some fine hardware to play with. The problem, as exposed in Iraq and elsewhere, is that they are not prepared to fight a prolonged, low-level, low-tech type of warfare which seems to be the norm in most of the world today. It would almost be better for the US, if someone would step up to the plate and fight them at the same level. I really don't think the US military would be any more successful keeping the peace at home than they are any place else.

I have high regards for the US military. My father was in the USAF for 24 years. I feel for many years, they have been forced to fight with one hand behind their back though because of having people like Rumsfield at the wheel.


Vietnam and Iraq (and 9/11) are proof that America's weaponry is something of a paper tiger. So I agree with you.

I also share your feelings about the US military, and am myself a veteran and the son of a decorated and severely disabled one.

I have to chuckle when I get attacked for lack of patriotism.

In fact, I have high regard for ANY military. It takes guts to put your ass on the line. The problem, of course, is that the military is a tool of politicians, who generally misuse it.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby max_power29 » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 04:21:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Euric', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'w')owplease, as a love it or leave it type, is right to be proud of America's weaponry. Because that's about all America has left. The dollar is backed by bombs and little else. Certainly not by trust, prestige, gold, savings, or a manufacturing base. All gone.

As the US Empire continues to crumble, it will continue to lash out in its death throes. As in Iraq, with the potential for much worse.

You talk about danger.


Those fabulous American weapons are going to come in very handy soon. When the US military's sole purpose will be to maintain law and order against its own citizens after the chaos of a dollar collapse.

They will be guarding shops to prevent looting, soup kitchen lines to prevent fights, banks to prevent robberies, and to transport law breakers and criminals to concentration camps. They will also be needed to guard petrol stations, refineries, power stations and substations and a whole list of areas that would be vulnerable to rebel citizen attacks.


This is what worries me the most about peakoil and the U.S. debt bomb. I am not nearly afraid of the poverty, starvation, or roaving bandits, as the government turning their weapons on their own citizens.

It is my hope that by the time this happens, the government will be too broke to afford these fancy weapons or the fuel for them for very long and that they will concentrate on the large cities first.

However, I don't see this scenario as likely because the death worshipping money masters are international. They will relish the misery of the U.S. people and the power trips it gives them. They will continue to make sure the "U.S. government" is well supplied.

This is the thought that keeps me awake at night as the worst possible peakoil (as well as all the other conerging disasters) scenario.
User avatar
max_power29
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 883
Joined: Wed 23 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Orygun
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Doly » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 08:07:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('max_power29', '
')This is what worries me the most about peakoil and the U.S. debt bomb. I am not nearly afraid of the poverty, starvation, or roaving bandits, as the government turning their weapons on their own citizens.


I don't think this is necessarily an either/or case. You could have a bit of everything: poverty, bandits, and a government or police force still trying to keep things in hold with guns.

But I personally believe you can scratch starvation from the list. The US has more than enough to feed themselves.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Heineken » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 09:59:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '
')But I personally believe you can scratch starvation from the list. The US has more than enough to feed themselves.


Ever heard of Peak Oil?
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Chuckmak » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 10:26:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', '
')But I personally believe you can scratch starvation from the list. The US has more than enough to feed themselves.


Ever heard of Peak Oil?


you know some people can't be bothered with those pesky little details :lol:
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City
Top

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Heineken » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 10:30:44

People have a way of tailoring their beliefs to ensure their own imaginary safety within a sort of cocoon. That's one of the main reasons we aren't doing anything as we hurtle toward destruction. It's the OTHER guy who will starve.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: Striking the US where it hurts

Unread postby Chuckmak » Mon 27 Nov 2006, 12:25:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'P')eople have a way of tailoring their beliefs to ensure their own imaginary safety within a sort of cocoon. That's one of the main reasons we aren't doing anything as we hurtle toward destruction. It's the OTHER guy who will starve.


Which is why I'm beginning to believe in both the Doomsday Theory (All intelligent civilizations destroy themselves) and Zoo Theory (Humanity is either not advanced enough or too dangerous and violent of a species so more intelligent civilizations leave us alone, like a zoo).
"if god doesn't exist, it is necessary that we invent him" - Voltaire

"they say prescott bush funded hitler" - Nas

Image
Chuckmak
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1000
Joined: Sat 19 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Bridge City
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests