Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Should you move out of a city before the collapse happens?

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Ibon » Fri 20 Feb 2015, 20:50:29

Looking back on those years living in South Florida I always remember the heavy tropical rains that would raise the ground water to the surface and cause the palmetto bugs to scramble all over the place searching for high ground.

Reading through this thread awakened that memory.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Pops » Fri 20 Feb 2015, 21:02:02

You thinking about eating bugs Ibon?

LOL,

I think Monkey said it, but I'll say it differently maybe: it is all about location, but the catch is there is no ideal location except the one you are ideally suited to inhabit.

So that is the quandary, find the location that suits your skill set, your tool set, your mindset.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Ibon » Fri 20 Feb 2015, 21:13:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
') it is all about location, but the catch is there is no ideal location except the one you are ideally suited to inhabit.

So that is the quandary, find the location that suits your skill set, your tool set, your mindset.


This begs a question. For what you are saying here is to be organically integrated to a physical place.

Many folks feel agitated exactly because this is the very thing lacking in their lives at the moment.

In fact, displacement has been globally the name of the game for the majority of the planets kudzu ape inhabitants who have wandered into high consumption. Let me name just three examples:

The disintegration of small town America and mass migration from rust belt to the south.
Immigrants leaving developing countries like The Philippines or Mexico and moving to richer countries
400 million chinese moving from subsistence agriculture to urban areas.

I could go on and on and name dozens of examples of human displacement that has unfolded in just the last 30 years.

Constraints are going to start putting on the squeeze exactly at a time when we have the maximum number of displaced folks on the planet.

This just kind of dawned on me as I am writing this..... Wow...
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Newfie » Fri 20 Feb 2015, 22:04:40

Yup, wow.

Not something I'm looking forward to.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Ibon » Sat 21 Feb 2015, 09:05:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', '
')Not something I'm looking forward to.


There are two sides to this displacement. Having billions of individuals who are all "emperors of one" disconnected from their organic communities seems so mal adaptive when you consider Pops quote above.

On the other hand a vast sea of displaced humanity living in artificial environments are not too deeply tethered to the land, community, physical assets. In other words, if and when constraints really start to squeeze and more and more humans become disenfranchised from a weakening status quo, they will be easily herded and lead.

The great pendulum that has swung so far to one side of glorifying individuality will swing back toward self sacrifice toward the group.

The darkest manifestations of this will be military engagements.

The most enlightened manifestations will be in communities that strengthen the commons and move to novel agrarian and urban living arrangements.

For me there is no need to speculate on how dark or light these manifestations will be. I know already in my bones, if history is any guide, that they will be a messy combination of both.

Let's not forget that both enlightened and evil manifestations represent a much needed disruption of the ultimate "evil" which has been our abuse to our planet. Understanding this means you welcome the coming disruption in its entire package, good and evil alike, for both are agents that lead eventually to a much needed new stasis.

It was my introduction of the Overshoot Predator as something to "worship" which is related to this line of thinking.

We all intuitively know that as a species we have become a rogue parasite on the planet. Agents that come both from enlightenment and darkness are remedies. They instill new cultural taboos which at the end of the day represent the only chance for our long term survival.

We should not fear the punctuated instability that lies before us. It is a vital part of cultural transition.
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Pops » Sat 21 Feb 2015, 10:06:28

I'd say we are not displaced from home as much as disconnected from the idea of home. A sweeping generality might be to say most of us who are not in our ancestral homes, are where we are because of a job - either our job, our spouse's or our parents..

People moved to those rust belt towns you mention Ibon to get a job when a job was the way out of the dead end drudgery of subsistence farming. That has been the overarching migration trend over the last 300 years, up out of the dirt onto the factory floor. It obviously has been a mostly positive move, otherwise people would move back.

But, if a transition is to be made the options aren't quite as clear cut. The one practical reason to move out of the city is to learn ahead of time how to survive a post collapse society. There are lots of subjective reasons to leave the city, but in this thread the reason is survival. But there is a huge opportunity cost to put all one's eggs in that basket. Unless a person has just the right set of circumstances and a real drive to "Live" in the country, beyond some vague dread of the future, it is probably a bridge too far.

Obviously retired and well off is one circumstance that merely takes the desire. Not really any need to learn anything, just hang out at homesteading.com and talk about your latest purchase, LOL.

Remote telecommuter is another group, I fit in here. I had some capital but had to continue working. I was almost too early because maintaining a connection was tough early on, but that is much better now. This is very doable now and easier all the time I'd think. But again, it is hard to not simply wind up with a hobby and a different set of possessions. Even if, like me, one has a set of rules, and the number one rule is "Don't Spend," owning a small plot provides unlimited excuses to do just that - Hey Its Prep!

The ideal group I'd say is young, idealistic, maybe with a little backing from parents but just a little. I talked to a few people like this when I had a blog. Actually we sold the farm to a young couple just out of the service. They had 2 or 3 kids and really were exactly like me, just a little younger when we moved, heads full of ideas; greenhouse, goat cheese, garden.
And family nearby.

The key is not to simply run away from the city, but to have a destination in mind - a plan. But also a clear idea of the opportunity cost.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Newfie » Sat 21 Feb 2015, 17:06:53

The problem I see with leaving the city is knowing where to go? What are you prepping for?

1. Slow decline and that there will be time for adjustment.
2. Fast crash, gangs wandering the streets, raiding stores.
3. Localized crash where other parts of the country can assist in maintaining law and order.

If it is to prep for 2 then I don't really know a homestead will help. Too many white too many guns. If it is for 1 or 3 then I think it makes more sense.

Of course there are other factors such as age, your partner, physical health, desire. At my age it really isn't a good option. And while I like guns I don't want to be around any shooting.

But the options soon become limited. Staying in the city has a whole different set of undesirable possibilities.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Ibon » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 04:51:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', ' ')a job was the way out of the dead end drudgery of subsistence farming. That has been the overarching migration trend over the last 300 years, up out of the dirt onto the factory floor. It obviously has been a mostly positive move, otherwise people would move back.


I always held in suspect Wendell Berry's prose glorifying agrarian life when you look at the overwhelming tide of humanity that chose urban living and jobs in cities over staying on the farm. My own father grew up on a farm in Lancaster County PA in the heart of Amish country. None of his five siblings chose to stay on the farm and it was sold to a Mennonite family in the early 50's. An old stone farm house built in 1794, quintessential in all aspects and economically viable but none of my dad's siblings could resist the lure of town life over the "drudgery" of subsistence farming.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')There are lots of subjective reasons to leave the city, but in this thread the reason is survival. But there is a huge opportunity cost to put all one's eggs in that basket. Unless a person has just the right set of circumstances and a real drive to "Live" in the country, beyond some vague dread of the future, it is probably a bridge too far.


Most urban dwellers are so far removed from the organic reality of agrarian life that it is not a viable choice unless this lifestyle becomes "urbanized" and the cultural trajectory moves in this direction.
The one thing we are perhaps underestimating is not so much the individual's subjective reasons but the culture's trajectory moving forward. We had two trends during the past 300 years. The move from subsistence farming to urban living and then from urban living to suburbia.

It is obvious that it is next to impossible for small farms today to be economically viable without some retirement money or being a remote telecommuter that subsidizes this lifestyle. No matter how young and willing and full of ideas the economics do not support private ownership of a farm. I am wondering if the next big trend when constraints really start to squeeze is a possible blending of agrarian and suburbia in a tighter commune or kibbutz like arrangement where there is communal ownership of expensive infrastructure like farm machinery, electronic technology, transport. This might sound so far from the current status quo as to sound almost idealistic but the key to this trajectory is exactly what you mentioned.....survival.

In a collapsing economy the urban and suburban dweller is increasingly disenfranchised and the private small farmer can't make it economically. You have a mass of humanity severely disrupted. Novel living arrangements will be born out of this disruption and all this potential labor from unemployed has to find outlets.

We are obsolete oldsters no doubt and do not represent a trend in a collapsing economy. There is however an energetic generation emerging which is not just going to sit around as the economic opportunities of a collapsing status quo offer them next to nothing.
[/quote]
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Pops » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 10:28:05

My wife made fried chicken last night. I had this big hunk of meat on my plate and asked what portion of the bird it was and she said it was a thigh! I didn't really believe her until I cut into it, I figured it had to be a breast or a half even, it was so large. I imagined I could see my fingernails growing from the hormones.
[Yeah I know, its genetics, not hormones]

Image

Food is incredibly cheap because it is incredibly efficient. Just like broilers have been selected for the genes to grow 4-5 times the size in half the time as in the 50's, everything else in ag has progressed -just as everything in every other area.

I remember as a kid going with my sister to gather at a local egg ranch. It was probably 1968 and just as primitive as if it was 1868. Imagine, a long, low, hot, dusty, dirt-floored wooden building with nest boxes on either side with hens and litter everywhere. Now fast forward to 1998 and I'm doing work for the biggest egg producer on the west coast. I visit a ranch on a photo "shoot" expecting some version of that 1968 scene and am amazed to find the eggs are "never touched by human hands." They roll right out of the cages onto a conveyor that moves them through underground tunnels to the packing plant where they are washed, sorted and crated by machine - it takes maybe an hour from the layer to the cooler. (which is where the tag line comes from)

I really have no idea how low wages would have to go, how high transport and energy would have to go, how far demand would have to fall before it would make sense to go back to the 1850s version.

That is the conundrum, continually increasing wages and constant downward commodity price pressure has made ag incredibly efficiency has made humans almost unnecessary to the process. Saying folks will just go back to the farm is like saying they'll go back to the secretarial pool or the assembly line.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Pops » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 10:36:19

P.S. Here is a list of papers by Prof John Ikerd from MIZZO - an ag economist I've recommended many times.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Lore » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 10:43:06

Yeah, but how many people really know the taste of a home grown chicken in the pot? I remember my mother making real chicken broth from our own birds. Not that watered down stuff you buy now at the local grocery today. That was real chicken and dumpling soup!

Most people can't leave the city because they couldn't figure out how to get their chicken McNuggets.

All that efficiency just means tasteless, chemically saturated food and one more technological chink in the armor that holds up the mass of humanity. Our Tower of Babel gets ever higher and the foundation ever weaker.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Pops » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 10:53:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'N')ot that watered down stuff ...

Mom made "broth" because chicken was an expensive luxury, basically it was seasoning to make the flour go down easier.

Today chicken is one of the cheapest sources of protein available, just about the equal of hamburger.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'A')ll that efficiency just means tasteless, chemically saturated food

What it means is there is no economical, manual alternative.
Mom can't feed 10 billion.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby dinopello » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 11:00:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', 'F')ood is incredibly cheap because it is incredibly efficient.


My problem is I want to pay more for less efficiency but it is sometimes to absolutely know that you aren't just getting ripped off.

I pay between 4 and 6 bucks for a dozen eggs. The Vital Farms eggs say they have the happiest chickens in the world, but how do I really know ? Like a lot of my neighbors, I may sign up for delivery from South Mountain Creamery which is local that you can visit and are actally cheaper than Vital Farms, or if I'm at this place called The Organic Butcher I'll get Polyface farm eggs just because I appreciate the efforts of the guy that runs that place.

I'm not judging people who want or need to buy the cheapest food possible. It's a matter of my personal priorities. For me, it's not so important that the food is non-GMO or organic but I just like to try, when I can to support people that treat the animals I'm going to eat somewhat humanely.

I guess to bring this back around to topic - For me, one of the advantages of moving out of the city would only be realized if it was to move to a community that still provided access to farm products that meet my preferences. Right now, that stuff is accessible in the city, but maybe not after collapse ? Although I'm sure that not every place outside of the city offers that either.

And, just to head of the obvious counter - yes I'll be eating bugs if it comes to that - but the bugs will be free range bugs!
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Newfie » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 11:16:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')That is the conundrum, continually increasing wages and constant downward commodity price pressure has made ag incredibly efficiency has made humans almost unnecessary to the process. Saying folks will just go back to the farm is like saying they'll go back to the secretarial pool or the assembly line.


That's right Pops, we have made ourselves obsolete. On the farm it is quite obvious. Not so much I the city where we have faux jobs, pretending to do something usefull.

Cities are largely chicken coops for excess humanity. Perhaps only exceeded by prisons.
User avatar
Newfie
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 18651
Joined: Thu 15 Nov 2007, 04:00:00
Location: Between Canada and Carribean
Top

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Lore » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 11:24:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Pops', '
')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'A')ll that efficiency just means tasteless, chemically saturated food

What it means is there is no economical, manual alternative.
Mom can't feed 10 billion.


Moms never had to or should they. That comes full circle back to an overpopulated planet getting figuratively ready to sell soylent green to the people. Packing them in todays cities is more like a holding maneuver.

I believe, like most things that have become supercharged with our abundance of energy, we've made Ag a big industrial capitilist business to feed the world. That in turn has just made more people. A pity in so doing we are reaching our limits and poisoning the very life that supports ours.

I'm thinking future generations will be forced to manual alternatives. The question is will you be better in the city to turn to them or not?

You only have to consider that most urbanites and farmers too go to a grocery store that, if it wern't for daily deliveries from markets thousands of miles away, would have empty shelves in just a couple of days. That should comfort no one living on the fifth floor of some apartment complex.
The things that will destroy America are prosperity-at-any-price, peace-at-any-price, safety-first instead of duty-first, the love of soft living, and the get-rich-quick theory of life.
... Theodore Roosevelt
User avatar
Lore
Fission
Fission
 
Posts: 9021
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Fear Of A Blank Planet
Top

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby dinopello » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 11:26:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Newfie', 'C')ities are largely chicken coops for excess humanity.


More like lion's dens or wolf packs at the neighborhood level. On the larger scale it is more like a hive. The suburbs are herd animals. I can see prisons as chicken coops though.
User avatar
dinopello
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6088
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: The Urban Village
Top

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Ibon » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 11:42:24

Pops, you post got me to thinking. We are dependent on this efficient industrial agriculture model as it provides the basics to feed 7 billion plus. That means that constraining resources will be prioritized to keep this agricultural system intact since it will be the discretionary segments of the economy which will suffer first. For this reason modern industrial agriculture will remain resilient through this century. Which really creates a challenge for agrarian alternative living arrangements.

This example of agriculture can be applied to other aspects of our modern life. You want a construction example analogous to agriculture. Look at this video of a hotel going up in China in 360 hours
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwvmru5JmXk

How far can we stretch depleting resources to extend the status quo with continued efficiency gains?
Patiently awaiting the pathogens. Our resiliency resembles an invasive weed. We are the Kudzu Ape
blog: http://blog.mounttotumas.com/
website: http://www.mounttotumas.com
User avatar
Ibon
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 9572
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Volcan, Panama

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Pops » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 11:46:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lore', 'I')'m thinking future generations will be forced to manual alternatives. The question is will you be better in the city to turn to them or not?
..
That should comfort no one living on the fifth floor of some apartment complex.

I'm not trying to comfort anyone. I get that a lot though because I don't uniformly condemn everything modern -including humans - as inherently evil, folks get the idea that I think everything is peachy.

What I try to do is show the challenge of transitioning within a system that has responded to generations of price pressure by becoming very efficient.

I reactivated the blog here if anyone is interested. My early posts were mostly about new farmers.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Pops » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 11:50:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ibon', 'W')hich really creates a challenge for agrarian alternative living arrangements.
..How far can we stretch depleting resources to extend the status quo with continued efficiency gains?

Exactly.
The central question for me since I began writing and reading here has not been Extending BAU, but Transitioning To a New Usual -TTNU
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)
User avatar
Pops
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 19746
Joined: Sat 03 Apr 2004, 04:00:00
Location: QuikSac for a 6-Pac
Top

Re: Should you move out of a city before the collapse happen

Unread postby Revi » Sun 22 Feb 2015, 12:46:58

I live in a small town, but even small towns are beset with problems nowadays. There are lots of drug addicts wandering the streets and we have even had a couple of muggings. They just busted 2 heroin dealers within a half mile of me, so there are problems now even in places that are outside of big cities. We are going to be left with a hollowed out shell of rusting small towns, abandoned farms and destroyed people. Some people see opportunity in rural areas, and our local farmer's market has breathed new life into rural areas close to this town. All of the farmers are young, and they are having kids, so it's not all bad around here. Living in an area like this is no picnic, and we are planning on moving away for retirement. We have a tree farm, and a maple sugar house, and it has been a struggle, but we are keeping it going. I think of it as good practice for what's coming, but I am afraid that there is not going to be any way of defending a remote agricultural operation once it gets worse. We already have taken many steps to harden it. Cameras help, but you can't always count on them. In short, I don't know if there is a place to run to in a rural area that is actually going to work.
Deep in the mud and slime of things, even there, something sings.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron