by Outcast_Searcher » Sun 01 Apr 2018, 17:12:45
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('StarvingLion', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Revi', 'W')e are going to see a future with less fossil fuels, but the average person won't know it. It won't be because of climate agreements. We are going to lose access to them. We'll all have our phones and call an Uber to get around, or walk. The great thing about walking is that it uses much less fossil fuels, and you can carry along a bag and look for bottles and cans as well. We'll use a lot less fossil fuel in the winter too huddling in our tar paper shacks along the interstate overpass. See, the future isn't so bleak after all!
Don't worry, I was just at a town meeting with some TPTB Boob who said we are undergoing a MASSIVE TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION where...
1. You don't own a car/truck.
2. There is no government
3. There is no education system
4. There is no healthcare.
5. Ponzi Schemes (Bitcoin) replace official government fiat Ponzi Scheme.
6. There is no such thing as affordable housing
7. etc etc etc.
In other words, algebra (Quantum Mechanics read useless Solar Cell and e-gizmo) will set you free. Meanwhile The Failed Physicists cannot even determine what is real after 100 years of Quantum Mechanics.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=10147They could just say: "You"re BANKRUPT with a net value < 0".
But no, Its a TECHNOLOGY REVOLUTION.
Feel better Revi?

So in your tiny little distortion-field producing mind, you can't imagine a scenario where data and historical trends matter? i.e. instead of making stuff up or just hoping for the very best or worst from the corny or fast crash doomer scenario?
Because if you look at history, it's VERY obvious that over time, regression to the mean is by far, the best bet (i.e., history follows a much more moderate trend, making it a good bet for the future, especially near term, based on a bazillion objective datapoints and facts.
Sorry if that doesn't produce an exciting, near religious level belief system narrative. Reality doesn't seem to care what wild stories people concoct. Yet it does conform, over time, to things like probability.