by Pops » Fri 12 Feb 2021, 16:15:47
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('AdamB', 'S')upply has no near-term requirement to decline
Shell just said their supply will decline 2% per year. I think I'll take their word on this at least.
Look, I'm OK, great even, with demand decline. Ditto demand destruction, even if it is artificial via whatever co2 cost penalty or other mechanism. Because of course controls can be controlled: taylored, adjusted, modified.
But just as you and others go on about all the previous peaks that weren't, I was harping on perceived peak demand in 2011 and before. Price was causing demand to fall and peak demand first hit the headlines in the oughts. But, lo and behold, as soon as the price fell, out came the F-250s, SUVs and Hellcats. Voilá, no demand peak. Light trucks were taking over car sales in fact. By 2019 the recovery was getting a little long in the tooth. Money was essentially cost-free and even so new car sales were stalled at 2015 levels.
Luckily time has moved on some from '05 and there are substitutes becoming available, hallelujah. However, if 2% per year from today turns out to be industry standard decline it is not going to be happy motoring, especially on top of elective destruction. And of course that doesn't count the LTO rate.
Can EVs replace the fleet at that clip? I don't know.
The legitimate object of government, is to do for a community of people, whatever they need to have done, but can not do, at all, or can not, so well do, for themselves -- in their separate, and individual capacities.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Fragment on Government (July 1, 1854)