Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby MD » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 06:20:33

If you want people to stop laughing at you, stop telling them that oil prices will continue to soar.

Peak oil does not mean prices will ratchet relentlessly upward, and the PO crowd really needs to latch onto that simple fact.

Instead, you will see very bad energy price driven recessions with wildly fluctuating energy prices. It has already started, just look.

I don't tell people that there will be oil shortages, if fact we will likely have an oil glut during much of the next 36 months.

Gleefully running up the posts every time a price spike occurs while shouting "see! see! peak oil has started" is completely counter productive.
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 08:39:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'a')aron,

I'm always interested in these "inflation" charts. I read some good critiques on them, bc the charts, like all charts, are based on plugged in numbers. First, who compiled this particular chart? Do you know what inflation rate they plugged in? How they valued the dollar?

There was an interesting counter-argument I read, although don't completely understand, that these inflation charts are skewed bc they don't take into account a dollar that has decreased in value over the same time period. That these charts only use the rising cost of goods using gov't inflation numbers (arguably skewed in and of themselves) but don't take into consideration the fact that the dollar has decreased in value over that same period of time. I'm probably not doing the argument justice. Any thoughts?


I think this is correct.

Inflation adjustment figures are highly suspect.

Not my point though.

Short-term variations in price mean little to the longer term trends in pricing.

Keep in mind that changes in oil price take as much as 19-24 months to filter though the global markets.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 08:51:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')pecop_007 wrote:
People assume Peak Oil is Peak Energy.
It is not.

Peak oil is real, peak energy (Which peak oil is correlated too) is a myth.

To put it simply, nothing is going to change except how we get our energy.


Not moronic at all... although presumptive.

This is the central question really.

Will a new oil emerge?

And perhaps more important... If a new oil does emerge... is that a good thing?

It's kinda like a trust-fund kid, who inherits millions & proceeds to spend it all quickly, with the belief that when it's gone, he can just find another pile of money.

Maybe he will... but perhaps he won't.

But if he does find new money... is that good for him?

Or for everyone else?
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 08:58:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '
')Not moronic at all... although presumptive.

This is the central question really.

Will a new oil emerge?

And perhaps more important... If a new oil does emerge... is that a good thing?

It's kinda like a trust-fund kid, who inherits millions & proceeds to spend it all quickly, with the belief that when it's gone, he can just find another pile of money.

Maybe he will... but perhaps he won't.

But if he does find new money... is that good for him?

Or for everyone else?


Absolutely we will. Itmay not be as handyas oil, but wedefinately will. We will have to adapt and change a bit. Gone will be the days of turning up the heat 3 more degrees simply because we want to wear a t-shirt in the winter, and gone will be the days of 500 HP sports cars. But definately, we will carry on.

Is it good or not? Well, I'm a doomer and I hate people, so definately I would say its not good, not good at all. I guess at thispoint my hopes for the destruction ofmankind rest on zombies, alien invasion, a big ass asteroid and Gods Second Coming.
What are you giving me for odds on those? :-D
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 09:26:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')bsolutely we will. Itmay not be as handyas oil, but wedefinately will. We will have to adapt and change a bit. Gone will be the days of turning up the heat 3 more degrees simply because we want to wear a t-shirt in the winter, and gone will be the days of 500 HP sports cars. But definately, we will carry on.

Is it good or not? Well, I'm a doomer and I hate people, so definately I would say its not good, not good at all. I guess at thispoint my hopes for the destruction ofmankind rest on zombies, alien invasion, a big ass asteroid and Gods Second Coming.
What are you giving me for odds on those?


Well I give you 50-50... but there is only a 10% chance of that... :)

And yes, initially it will mean less sports cars & heat on demand... for us.

For much of the world it means starvation, disease, abject poverty and all that comes with it.

And that means war.

The energy haves will indeed get energy however they can... as long as the have-nots stay in line that is.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 09:30:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '
')
Well I give you 50-50... but there is only a 10% chance of that... :)


Whos the PO bookie? :-D

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd yes, initially it will mean less sports cars & heat on demand... for us.

For much of the world it means starvation, disease, abject poverty and all that comes with it.


How is that different from right now?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nd that means war.


See above. :cry:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he energy haves will indeed get energy however they can... as long as the have-nots stay in line that is.


Again, see above. Just like its always been. The more things change, themore they stay the same.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 09:36:08

Yes the same... but in greater proportion.

The "energy gap"

Saying it's "more of the same" or "business as usual" is trite.

I say our planet has never faced such potential catastrophe.

And the consequences will compare to our current conflicts, as crack compares to Sanka.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 09:40:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', 'Y')es the same... but in greater proportion.

The "energy gap"

Saying it's "more of the same" or "business as usual" is trite.

I say our planet has never faced such potential catastrophe.

And the consequences will compare to our current conflicts, as crack compares to Sanka.


"Am I my brothers keeper?"

Lets be honest Aaron, I'd ventureto say 75% ofus (PO members) will be able to handle it, if seeing a reduction in our standard of living. Its the fringe thats going to fall.
Yes, the gap will increase. But for people like you and me, whats the true net change? Instead of waiting till I'm 50 to get a Vette, I never get one. But my home is still heated and I still drive to work everyday, if perhaps in an electric or otherwise high efficiency utilitarian car.

But we're not "Fringers", we'll survive. We'll carry on.

"Am I my brothers keeper?"
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 09:42:05

My spacebar is flaky on my keyboard. :oops:

Sometimes my words run together, fear not I'm well aware ofhow English sentence structure is supposed to work. My keyboard doesnt always agree with me however. :-D
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 09:54:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Am I my brothers keeper?"


Dunno... are you?

But do you really expect that the vast majority of sheeple will leave us to our degraded lives?

I don't see lack of electricity as a serious future problem for westerners...

Lack of common sense however is sure to be plentiful.

Kickin it on Reaper Island should be sweet... while the rest of the planet wars to control dwindling oil supplies.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 10:29:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Am I my brothers keeper?"


Dunno... are you?


Nope, and most of the world agrees with me on that issue. We are not our brothers keeper. If you cant afford your car...well, no skin off my back. If your standard of living drops a notch or three....Well, sucks to be you.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut do you really expect that the vast majority of sheeple will leave us to our degraded lives?

I don't see lack of electricity as a serious future problem for westerners...

Lack of common sense however is sure to be plentiful.

Kickin it on Reaper Island should be sweet... while the rest of the planet wars to control dwindling oil supplies.


Now your falling back into the old way of thinking...
What if we had a new energy sourcwe that was, for all practical purposes, as usable as good ole crude, if not as powerful or fun.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 10:40:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Am I my brothers keeper?"


Dunno... are you?


Nope, and most of the world agrees with me on that issue. We are not our brothers keeper. If you cant afford your car...well, no skin off my back. If your standard of living drops a notch or three....Well, sucks to be you.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut do you really expect that the vast majority of sheeple will leave us to our degraded lives?

I don't see lack of electricity as a serious future problem for westerners...

Lack of common sense however is sure to be plentiful.

Kickin it on Reaper Island should be sweet... while the rest of the planet wars to control dwindling oil supplies.


Now your falling back into the old way of thinking...
What if we had a new energy sourcwe that was, for all practical purposes, as usable as good ole crude, if not as powerful or fun.


Isn't the reality though that we all live in the world we collectively create?

I can say "sucks to be you" all I like, but at the end of the day, I'm stuck dealing with the consequences of a large & growing pissed-off majority.

My study of human history is incomplete, but I do have a sense that our track record for handling the kinds of challenges peak oil is certain to bring is less than desirable, to be exceptionally kind.

When the dust has cleared, I expect the depletion of conventional oil to widen the rich/poor gap to never before seen proportions.

And to the extent this gap grows, I contend that conflict will grow at similar rates.

What's so old think about that?
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 10:44:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '
')
Isn't the reality though that we all live in the world we collectively create?

I can say "sucks to be you" all I like, but at the end of the day, I'm stuck dealing with the consequences of a large & growing pissed-off majority.

My study of human history is incomplete, but I do have a sense that our track record for handling the kinds of challenges peak oil is certain to bring is less than desirable, to be exceptionally kind.

When the dust has cleared, I expect the depletion of conventional oil to widen the rich/poor gap to never before seen proportions.

And to the extent this gap grows, I contend that conflict will grow at similar rates.

What's so old think about that?


Reality is what we create, to an extent.
People die every day from starvation and wars in Africa, are raped, sold into slavery. Does that affect you andme? No, it really doesnt. Unless we choose to be affected by it on some emotional level, but otherwise.... It really doesnt affect out day to day lives.

As for "old think" your applying the degradation of society on a micro level, you need to think macro.
What if new technologies come around with "solve our energy crisis" on a micro level (country) but not macro level (worldwide) such that the disparity between the haves and have nots is not manifested in our neighborhoods, but between us and say.....Mexico, or a country in Africa.
What if our (being Americans as a collective) standard of living drops just onenotch. You and I never get a Vette, but we still have a decent house, heat and food on the table.
But the people in the fringe countries (N. Korea and other devleopingnations, China to a lesser extent) actually fall backwards to what we would consider abyssmal levels, or in fact never even get a chance to advance to a better standard of living.
Essentially, those places that are just starting to take baby steps to being developed countries crash back down and those established, well devloped countries continue on with very little noticable effect.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Aaron » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 11:14:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut the people in the fringe countries (N. Korea and other devleopingnations, China to a lesser extent) actually fall backwards to what we would consider abyssmal levels, or in fact never even get a chance to advance to a better standard of living.
Essentially, those places that are just starting to take baby steps to being developed countries crash back down and those established, well devloped countries continue on with very little noticable effect.


I can well imagine a very similar argument being made in the US prior to WWII.

50 million dead folks later, and a couple of nukes and that war ended.

I wonder what a similar situation would look like today?

I mean I'm sure you are perfectly safe, nestled here in your secure country, and need not bother with the plight of China or other developing nations.

On the other hand, maybe those short-sighted folks back in 1939 had a similar perception. Perhaps they too felt somewhat smug and secure, isolated from the rest of humanity.

I hope you're right... I live here too.

But I find it hard to envision how we can avoid being drawn into escalating global conflict which resource poverty is sure to generate.
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby peripato » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 11:31:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'P')eople assume Peak Oil is Peak Energy.
It is not.

Peak oil is real, peak energy (Which peak oil is correlated too) is a myth.

To put it simply, nothing is going to change except how we get our energy.

As a result of peak oil plenty will change in the future, including how we get our energy. All energy production requires some energy input to derive it, and the amount required ultimately determines its effectiveness. Petroleum and to a lesser extent NG and Coal are the cheapest, densest energy sources we have ever encountered. All other energy sources (most wind, solar, biofuels etc) are dispersed, although they do exist on a limited scale in natural concentrations like with geothermal, hydro, or in very windy places.

Because they are dispersed and need to be gathered up these alternate energy sources require a high energy input into their production cycle before they can be made available in a usable form. This additional cost burden either removes or severely diminishes their economic viability. So when we are forced in desperation to turn increasingly to some or all of these alternatives, as the amount of cheap energy available to us declines post peak, how is the rising expense in producing them not going to flow into the economy and ultimately change its character and vitality? After all we built modern civilisation on the continuous availability of cheap fossil fuels.
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 11:47:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'P')eople assume Peak Oil is Peak Energy.
It is not.

Peak oil is real, peak energy (Which peak oil is correlated too) is a myth.

To put it simply, nothing is going to change except how we get our energy.

As a result of peak oil plenty will change in the future, including how we get our energy. All energy production requires some energy input to derive it, and the amount required ultimately determines its effectiveness. Petroleum and to a lesser extent NG and Coal are the cheapest, densest energy sources we have ever encountered. All other energy sources (most wind, solar, biofuels etc) are dispersed, although they do exist on a limited scale in natural concentrations like with geothermal, hydro, or in very windy places.

Because they are dispersed and need to be gathered up these alternate energy sources require a high energy input into their production cycle before they can be made available in a usable form. This additional cost burden either removes or severely diminishes their economic viability. So when we are forced in desperation to turn increasingly to some or all of these alternatives, as the amount of cheap energy available to us declines post peak, how is the rising expense in producing them not going to flow into the economy and ultimately change its character and vitality? After all we built modern civilisation on the continuous availability of cheap fossil fuels.


Do you consider cold fusion to be "cheap energy"?
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Lokutus » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 13:02:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'P')eople assume Peak Oil is Peak Energy.
It is not.

Peak oil is real, peak energy (Which peak oil is correlated too) is a myth.

To put it simply, nothing is going to change except how we get our energy.


This is the dumbest thing I have read so far on this board.

Really.


You should go read some of your posts.

Really.

Your the dumbest, most crybaby ignorant fucktard I've ever seen online.
Fortunately, I see that hasnt changed.


Every board has its resident moran.

You're ours.


:lol:

"Ours"?? And just where the hell do YOU fit in here? Your not one of the community if thats what you think, I assure you of that.
You show up a few months ago out of the blue all panicky about the end of the world, then you want it to happen because the fact President Bush got voted in is proof the world hates you, now the fact everyone is laughing at you cause prices are falling is proof the world hates you and you want to go to another board.
Your a fair weather Chicken Little, looking for a cause to support your worthless existance on this planet.
Alot of posters here can say "ours", and alot of those who can could also say I'm a maroon without much dissent from me.

But you? Fuck all that. Your neither "ours", nor in ANY position to be calling anyone a maroon.

Go find another board to cry on, you've wasted enough bandwidth here.

Nice life you've built for yourself, sparky.

Gas station attendant by day.

Message board stud by night.

I am soooo jellus.

Carry on.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby erl » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 14:39:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', 'I') am soooo jellus.


That much, at least, is apparent.
erl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 580
Joined: Mon 21 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby peripato » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 20:10:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peripato', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', 'P')eople assume Peak Oil is Peak Energy.
It is not.

Peak oil is real, peak energy (Which peak oil is correlated too) is a myth.

To put it simply, nothing is going to change except how we get our energy.

As a result of peak oil plenty will change in the future, including how we get our energy. All energy production requires some energy input to derive it, and the amount required ultimately determines its effectiveness. Petroleum and to a lesser extent NG and Coal are the cheapest, densest energy sources we have ever encountered. All other energy sources (most wind, solar, biofuels etc) are dispersed, although they do exist on a limited scale in natural concentrations like with geothermal, hydro, or in very windy places.

Because they are dispersed and need to be gathered up these alternate energy sources require a high energy input into their production cycle before they can be made available in a usable form. This additional cost burden either removes or severely diminishes their economic viability. So when we are forced in desperation to turn increasingly to some or all of these alternatives, as the amount of cheap energy available to us declines post peak, how is the rising expense in producing them not going to flow into the economy and ultimately change its character and vitality? After all we built modern civilisation on the continuous availability of cheap fossil fuels.


Do you consider cold fusion to be "cheap energy"?

I can't say I understand that much about it to be honest. However I do know that the whole cold fusion hypothesis is wracked by controversy. It appears that small amounts of heat may have been generated during expirementation but on what level, if any, this process can be harnessed to produce energy on a widescale commercial basis remains to be seen. Cold fusion along with many other marginal and speculative energy sources are at such a primordial stage of development that their widespread utilisation, even if proven viable, are far into the future. We need more cheap energy now - not in 50 years.
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: Seriously Considering Abandoning PO

Unread postby Specop_007 » Sat 31 Dec 2005, 22:35:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lokutus', '
')
Nice life you've built for yourself, sparky.

Gas station attendant by day.

Message board stud by night.

I am soooo jellus.

Carry on.


OH!! OUCH!! ZING!! BURN!!!


:roll:
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron